Architectural Review Commission – 11/03/25
. >>TED KEMPTON: WELCOME, EVERYONE, I AM TED KEMPTON, CHAIR OF THE COMMISSION. IF YOU ARE THERE PRESENT THE PROJECT, YOU WILL HAVE LIMITED TIME TO MAKE YOUR PRESENTATION SO WE SUGGEST BEING THOROUGH AND CONCISE. WHEN COMING TO THE MICROPHONE, IDENTIFY YOURSELF AND YOUR RELATIONSHIP TO THE PROJECT. THE COMMISSION WILL NOT ASK ANY QUESTIONS DURING YOUR PRESENTATION. YOUR PROJECT SHOULD BE PRESENTED IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER: SITE PLAN, ELEVATIONS, ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS AND WALL SECTIONS. STAFF WILL THEN PRESENT THEIR REPORT. FOLLOWING STAFF REPORT, WE WILL THEN ASK FOR PUBLIC COMMENT. STATE AND SPELL YOUR NAME CLEARLY IF YOU WERE HERE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST A PROJECT. YOUR TIME WILL BE LIMIT TO THREE MINUTES SO TAKE SOME TIME TO SUMMARIZE YOUR COMMENTS BECAUSE THREE MINUTES CAN GO BY VERY QUICKLY. FOLLOWING PUBLIC COMMENT THE COMMISSIONERS ALSO ASK QUESTIONS IN THE SAME ORDER OF PRESENTATION. NEXT, THE APPLICANT WILL HAVE FIVE MINUTES FOR REBUTTAL. PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE CLOSED. AFTER IT IS CLOSED NO FURTHER TESTIMONY. COMMISSIONERS WILL DISCUSS THE CASE AND MAKE THEIR DECISION BASED ON CHAPTER 27 CODE OF ORDINANCES, DESIGN GUIDELINES, SECRETARY OF INTERIOR GUIDELINES, HISTORIC PRESERVATION REVIEW COMMITTEE COMMENTS AND THE TESTIMONY GIVEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. THE ARC CAN ONLY ACT ON ITEMS WITHIN OUR OWN JURISDICTIONAL RESPONSIBILITY. OWNER-AGENTS ARE INDIVIDUALLY RESPONSIBLE TO OBTAIN ANY APPROPRIATE PERMITS AND/OR APPROVALS. IF YOU HAVEN’T ALREADY DONE SO, PLEASE SILENCE CELL PHONES AND START ON MY LEFT WITH INTRODUCES OF COMMISSIONERS. >>ELENA PARAS KETCHUM: ELENA PARAS KETCHUM, ATTORNEY REPRESENTATIVE. >>JOHN PROKOP: JOHN PROKOP. I PRACTICE ARCHITECTURE. >>DAN MYERS: DAN MYERS, ARCHITECT. >>TIM JONES: TIM JONES, GENERAL CONTRACTOR. >>TED KEMPTON: WE HAVE RON VILA, CHRISTOPHER DERBACK, JA JARED VARNUM AND OUR ATTORNEY, DANA CROSBY COLLIER IN ATTENDANCE. OKAY. I AM LOOKING FOR A MOTION FOR MEN. >>ELENA PARAS KETCHUM: MOVE TO ACCEPT THE OCTOBER 6 AND OCTOBER 8. .>>SPEAKER: SECOND. >>TED KEMPTON: A MOTION. SEEING NO DISCUSSION, PLEASE SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE. MOTION PASSES. >>RON VILA: GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONERS, DENNIS FERNANDEZ, ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION MANAGER. WELCOME TO THIS EVENING’S PUBLIC HEARING. WELCOME TO THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE AND ON CCTV. WE DID HAVE SOME TECHNICAL PROBLEMS WITH THE STAFF APPROVALS, BUT WE WILL BRING THAT TO YOU AND FILE THAT FOR YOU PROPERLY. WE WILL HAVE A NEW COMMISSIONER JOINING US IN DECEMBER. HE IS GOING TO BE AN ALTERNATE. SO THE BOARD IS COMPOSED OF SEVEN MEMBERS WHO HAVE FILL CERTAIN PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS AND THEN TWO ALTERNATES. WE HAVEN’T HAD AN ALTERNATE ON THE COMMISSION IN A WHILE, SO THAT INDIVIDUAL WILL SERVE IF ONE OF THE FULL MEMBERS CANNOT SERVE. SO BECAUSE OF THAT NUANCE, WE ARE GOING TO BE ASKING YOU TO BE RESPONSIVE TO OUR INQUIRIES FOR QUORUM POLLS, BECAUSE IF SOMEONE IS NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO ATTEND, WE CAN LET THE ALTERNATE KNOW THAT HE WILL BE ATTENDING, AND THAT WILL HELP ENSURE THAT WE WILL HOLD THE PUBLIC HEARINGS WHEN WE HAVE MEMBERS THAT HAVE CONFLICTS. NEXT, I DID WANT TO GO AHEAD AND PRESENT THE PRESERVATION IN PROGRESS. OUR PRESERVATION IN PROGRESS IN THE CURRENT MONTH AND THE UPCOMING MONTH WILL BE FOCUS AND BOR YBOR CITY. WE ARE CELEBRATING YBOR CITY BECAUSE IN OCTOBER, YBOR CELEBRATED 140th ANNIVERSARY OF BEING ESTABLISHED. THAT IS WHEN THE LAND SALE BETWEEN THE CITY OF TAMPA A AND VICENTE MARTINEZ YBOR OCCURRED IN EARLY OCTOBER OF 1885. NEXT YEAR, WE CELEBRATE THE 140th ANNIVERSARY OF THE FIRST CIGAR BEING ROLLED IN YBOR CITY, WHICH ACTUALLY DIDN’T OCCUR BY ONE OF THE VICENTE YBOR’S FACTORY BUT HIS RIVAL. KIND OF AN INTERESTING STORY THAT INVOLVED LABOR STRIKES AT THAT PARTICULAR TIME. BUT TODAY, WE ARE GOING TO BE FOCUSING ON ONE OF THE PROPERTIES IN YBOR CITY. IF I CAN GO TO THE POWERPOINT. AND I AM GOING TO TRY MY BEST NOT TO DISRESPECT MY LATIN HERITAGE WITH MY SPANISH SPEAKING, BUT WE ARE TALKING OF PARQUE AMIGOS OF JOSE MARTE, THE FRIENDS OF HOPE SAY MARTI PARK. REFERRED TO AS JOSE MARTI PARK LOCATED IN THE YBOR CITY HAD IS TO ARIC DISTRICT. AN INTERESTING STORY THAT ENTAILS THIS PARTICULAR PIECE OF PROMPT. LET’S SEE. DOES NOT WANT TO ADVANCE? LET’S TRY IT THAT WAY. JOSE MARTI PARK IS LOCATED IN YBOR CITY ON THE CORNER OF 89th AVENUE AND 13th STREET. JUST SOUTH OF THE VM YBOR CIGAR FACTORY COMPLEX. AND IT IS A SMALL PARCEL, LESS THAN A QUARTER ACRE THAT IS SITUATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER. — SORRY, SOUTHEAST CORNER. JOSE MARTI WAS CUBAN PATRIOT AND REMEMBERED AS A SYMBOL OF CUBA’S STRUGGLE OF INDONESIA PENCE FROM SPAIN. HE WAS A SON OF SPANISH COLONISTS AND BARN IN HAVANA, CUBA IN 1853. MARTI BECAME INTERESTED IN WRITING AND POLITICS AT A YOUNG AGE. 1868, MARKED THE START OF THE CUBA’S TEN-YEAR WAR AGAINST SPAIN. AT THAT AGE AT THAT TIME HE WAS 16 AND BEGAN TO PUBLISH A NEWS PAPER CALLED LA PATRIA LIBRE SUPPORTING CUBAN INDEPENDENCE. HE GRADUATED AT SCHOOL IN SPAIN AND SPENT TIME TRAVELLING IN EUROPE EVENTUALLY SETTLING IN MEXICO IN 1875 WHERE HE WORKED AS A JOURNALIST, PROFESSOR AND DRAMAIST. WHEN THE MEXICAN GOVERNMENT WAS OVERTHROWN IN 1876, HE MOVED TO GUATEMALA. HIS POLITICAL TROUBLES IN GUATEMALA SENT HIM BACK TO CUBA AND HE WAS DEPORTED BACK TO SPAIN BECAUSE OF HIS REVOLUTIONARY ACTIVITIES. HE SETTLED IN NEW YORK WHERE HE BECAME LEADER OF THE CUBAN EXILED COMMUNITY. MARTI’S POLITICAL EXPERTISE WAS EXTENSIVE. HE WROTE FOR NEWS PAPERS IN ARGE ARGENTINA, VENEZUELA AND MEXICO. HE PUBLISHED POETRY. BEGAN A MAGAZINE FOR CHILDREN. AND EMPHASIZE $THE NIGHT OF THE EDUCATION FOR BLACK CHILDREN. HE TRAVELED EXTENSIVELY AND SPOKE BEFORE MEMBERS OF CUBAN AUTO EXILES IN TAMPA AND KEY WEST WHERE THE CIGAR FACTORIES AND IMMIGRANT WORK FORCE WAS THE EAR TO THE SUBJECT OF CUBAN INDEPENDENCE. MARTI, WHO IS PICTURED HERE ON THE LEFT PICTURE ON THE STAIRS OF YBOR’S FACTORY, WHICH WAS TAKEN IN 1891, ONE OF HIS MOST FAMOUS SPEECHES HERE. HE WAS ALWAYS SURROUNDED BY MANY SUPPORTERS IN THESE FACTORIES TO BOTH BELIEVED IN HIS CAUSE AND FUNDED IT. MARTI FOUND CUBAN IMMIGRANTS IN TAMPA TO BE VERY SYMPATHETIC AS WERE CUBANS LIVING IN KEY WEST AT THE TIME. ON THE PARK SITE WAS SITUATED A SMALL HOUSE. YOU SEE THAT HERE ON THE PHOTOGRAPH TO THE LEFT. DURING MARTI’S VISIT TO TAMPA, HE STAYED WITH HIS FRIENDS ROBERTO AND PAULINE THAT PEDROS WHO HE IN ET IN KEY WEST. THEY RAN A BOARDING HOUSE IN YBOR CITY. THE PHOTOGRAPH ON THE LEFT WAS TAKEN IN THE 1930s AND YOU CAN SEE THE HOUSE AND PROXIMITY TO THE BRICK FACTORY ACROSS THE STREET. IT IS NOTABLE THAT THE PEDROSAS WERE BLACK CUBAN AND ROW PER TOE ONE OF THE FOUNDER OF THE MARTIN MACEO SOCIETY, A SOCIAL AND MUTUAL CLUB TO AID BLACK CUBANS. INTERESTING IN YBOR THAT THE CUBAN IMMIGRANTS WERE ORIGINALLY PART OF THE SAME CUBANO SOCIAL CLUB UNTIL JIM CROW LAWS KICKED IN, AND THE BLACK CUBAN HAD TO LEAVE THAT CLUB AND FORM THEIR OWN CLUB. MARTI HELD EGALITARIAN VIEWS AND KNOWN FOR HIS OPPOSITION TO SLAVERY IN CUBA UNTIL IT WAS EVENTUALLY ABOLISHED IN 1886. DURING AN 1893 VISIT TO TAMPA, MARTI WAS POISONED AND THE PETITIONEDROSAS INSISTED ON TAKING HIM INTO THEIR HOME INSTEAD OF A HOSPITAL. AND THEY GUARDED IT, HE SURVIVED THE ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT BUT HE DIED AT A FIGHT OF THE BATTLE OF DOS RIOS. PAULINE THAT PETITIONEDROSA IS PICTURE THERE ON THE RIGHT. THE PEDROSAS PROPERTY BECAME OWNED BY A GROUP OF CUBAN IMMIGRANTS. IN THE 1950s THEY DONATED IT TO THE REPUBLIC OF CUBA IN CONSIDERATION FOR THEIR LOVE AND AFFECTION FOR THEIR NATIVE COUNTRY. FOLLOWING CONSULTATION WITH THEN PRESIDENT — CUBAN TBAPTISTA, A HEFTY DONATION WAS GRANTED BY THE CUBAN GOVERNMENT AND MANY OF THE FEATURES THAT YOU SEE TODAY, THE WALL, THE ENTRY STATE AND THE STATUE WERE COMMISSIONED. T PEDROSA HOUSE DEMOLISHED IN THE 1960s, THE STATUE AND THE WAS A TRIBUTE TO JOSE MARTI AND ALSO A MEMORIAL TO THE GENERAL MACE HOMEWORKS LED THE CUBAN ARMY INVASION ACROSS CUBAN IN 1896. HE DIED INFORM COMBAT AT PUNTA BRAVA. THE SIGNAGE IN THE PARK IS BOTH IN ENGLISH AND SPANISH, AND WHITE THE CITY OF TAMPA MAINTAIN THIS PARK UNDER AGREEMENT, IT IS ACTUALLY OWNED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF CUBA TODAY. RECENTLY, JOSE MARTI PARK WAS FEATURED DURING A TOUR THAT THE STAFF LED OF THE INTERNATIONAL CITY-COUNTY MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION AT ITS ANNUAL CONFERENCE HELD IN TAMPA. THEY WERE PRESENT AS WELL AS, OF COURSE, SOME CHICKENS AND ROOSTERS THAT ARE IN YBOR CITY. JOSE MARTI AND THE PARK ARE IN THE BRICK AND MORTAR NEWSLETTER IN YOUR PACKETS AND ALSO AVAILABLE ON OUR WEB SITE. SO IT IS A REALLY INTERESTING PIECE OF HISTORY AND I THINK UNIQUE TO REALLY ALL PROPERTY IN THE COUNTRY RIGHT HERE KIND OF NESTLED IN TO YBOR CITY HISTORIC DISTRICT. >>TED KEMPTON: THANK YOU, DENNIS. >>DENNIS FERNANDEZ: WITH THAT WE WILL MOVE TO CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND DISCLOSURES OF EX-PARTE COMMUNICATION AND ASK OUR LEGAL COUNSEL TO LEAD THAT DISCUSSION. >>DANA CROSBY COLLIER: DANA CROSBY COLLIER WITH THE CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE. GOOD EVENING. I WOULD LIKE TO ASK IF ANY MEMBER OF THE COMMISSION HAS A CONFLICT OF INTEREST FOR ANY ITEM ON THE AGENDA THIS EVENING? >> I DO NOT. >>TED KEMPTON: ONE OF THE CASE IS A NEIGHBOR OF MINE, BUT I DON’T HAVE ANY CONFLICT. CUTANEOUS DANA NO SPECIAL GAIN OR LOSS TO YOU. >>TED KEMPTON: NO. >>DANA CROSBY COLLIER: ANY ANYBODY ENGAGED IN EX-PARTE COMMUNICATION WITH REGARD TO ANY ITEM ON THE AGENDA? >> I HAVE NOT. >>DANA CROSBY COLLIER: THANK YOU. >>DENNIS FERNANDEZ: THANK YOU. WE DO NOT HAVE ANY CONTINUATIONS TO ACT UPON, BUT I DID WANT TO CALL TO YOUR ATTENTION THAT ARC 25-0000339 HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN AT THE AGENT’S REQUEST IN CASE ANYONE WAS FOLLOWING THAT PARTICULAR CASE. WITH THAT WE ARE READY FOR THE SWEAR IN. I WILL ASK ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WILL BE PRESENTING OR GIVING PUBLIC TESTIMONY THIS EVENING TO PLEASE STAND FOR THE SWEAR-IN, INCLUDING STAFF. [SWEARING IN] >>DENNIS FERNANDEZ: WITH THAT, WE ARE READY FOR OUR FIRST CASE AND RON WILL INTRODUCE THE CASE. >>RON VILA: GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONERS. I AM RON VILA. I AM A PLANNER WITH HISTORIC PRESERVATION. FIRST AGENDA ITEM IN EVENING IS ARC-25-0000240, THIS IS FOR THE ADDRESS OF 825 BAYSHORE BOULEVARD. THIS IS IN THE HYDE PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT. THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE DATES BACK TO 1922 AND IT IS CONTRIBUTING. ONE OTHER STRUCTURE ON THE SITE. IT IS ALSO CONTRIBUTING. IT IS A DETACHED GARAGE. THE UNDERLYING ZONING ATTACHED TO THIS PARCEL IS RS-06. NO FOOTPRINT CHANGE REQUESTED. AND REQUEST IS FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR MODIFICATION TO THE CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE AND DESIGN DETAILS WITH SITE IMPROVEMENTS. UNDER PAST ACTIONS ON PAGE 3, YOU SAW THIS IN AUGUST 2025. THERE WERE APPROVALS THAT WERE ATTACHED TO THAT PUBLIC HEARING. ONE OF THE APPROVALS WAS A VARLAND OF SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 7 FOOT TO 1 FOOT WITH 0 FEET FOR ENCROACHMENT FOR EAVES AND GUTTERS AND THE STRUCTURE ELEVATED FROM SEA LEVEL TO 18. 25 FEET. THE PROJECT IS COMING FORWARD FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR FINAL APPR APPROVAL. TO SHARE SOME PHOTOS WITH YOU. IN IS THE SANBORN MAP. IN RED SHOWS THE AREA OF THE LOCAL HYDE PARK DISTRICT. THE PROPERTY IS ON THE FRONT LINE ON BAYSHORE BOULEVARD, WHICH IS THAT 825 BAYSHORE. AND I WANT TO ZOOM IN. I THINK THAT IS VERY IMPORTANT. AS THE AGENT GOES THROUGH THE REQUEST. THE SANBORN MAP PROVIDES US WITH A LOT OF INFORMATION. AS YOU ZOOM IN, THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION WHICH IS IN GREEN. IT IS YELLOW. YELLOW IS FRAMED CONSTRUCTION. AND USUALLY IF THERE IS A CLADDING ON THAT STRUCTURE, IT IS INDICATED AS WELL. IF YOU LOOK AT THESE OVER HERE, THIS IS FRAMED CONSTRUCTION THAT THE CENTER IS IN YELLOW AND IT IS CLADDED IN RED WHICH IS BRICK CONSTRUCTION. FRAMED BUILDING WITH BRICK. THIS ONE IS FRAME AND THEN IT HAS NO CLADDING OTHER THAN WOOD. SO AS THE AGENT GOES THROUGH THE EXERCISE. AND THEY ARE GOING TO TALK ABOUT, YOU KNOW, SOME MODIFICATIONS TO THE STRUCTURE AS IT EXISTS TODAY. HE WILL GO THROUGH THAT AND PROVIDE YOU WITH SOME ADDITIONAL DETAIL. THIS IS JUST AN AERIAL SHOWING THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION. THERE IS AN ALLEY TO THE REAR OR A STREET CALLED O’BRIAN. AND THEN IT FACES BAYSHORE BOULEVARD. THIS IS LOOKING AT THE STREET. THERE ARE SOME SITE IMPROVEMENTS COMING FORWARD AS WELL. SO YOU HAVE THE MAIN DRIVEWAY THAT I SHOW COMING DOWN THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. THEY ARE GOING TO ENGAGE A CIRCULAR DRIVE WITH A RETAINING WALL. YOU SEE THE STRUCTURE BEHIND IT. THIS IS LOOKING AT THE SOUTH ELEVATION. AND THE PRIMARY FACADE. TO THE LEFT, WHICH IS THE SOUTH, IS NEW CONSTRUCTION. A NONCONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE. GOING BACK TO THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE, THERE HAS BEEN SOME EXPLORATORY WORK IN THE AREA. YOU SEE SOME CRAFTSMAN INFLUENCES ON THE WINDOW. JUST THE VERNACULAR IS AN AMERICAN FOUR SQUARE AND THAT WILL BE IMPORTANT PART OF THE DISCUSSION AS IF MOVES FORWARD. LOOK AT THE DRIVE AISLE, TRADITIONAL RIBBON DRIVE AND CONCRETE. THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH IS A PERIOD CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE AS WELL. LOOKING DOWN THE DRIVE AISLE, THERE IS GOING TO BE SOME WORK TO THE APRON AND PROBABLY THE SIDEWALK, AND THEN AS YOU GET INTO PRIVATE PROPERTY, IT WILL BE DISCUSSED THIS EVENING. MOVING TO THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY, ONCE AGAIN, YOU SEE SOME EXPLORATORY WORK THAT HAS BEEN DONE HERE TO PROVIDE WITH YOU SOME GUIDANCE MOVING FO FORWARD. HERE IS AN ADDITIONAL PICTURE OF THE REAR. THIS IS THE DETACH ED CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE I SPOKE ABOUT. SHOTS OF THE ALLEY SO YOU HAVE AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE COMPLETE PARCEL. FOCUSING ON BAYSHORE BOULEVARD. LOOKING BACK INTO DOWNTOWN. AND THEN LEAVING THE SUBJECT SITE AND THEN TO FOCUS BACK ON THE HOUSE THAT IS THERE NOW. THAT CONCLUDES THE PHOTO PRESENTATION. I TO HAVE THESE AVAILABLE. THESE MIGHT BECOME IMPORTANT AS WE GO THROUGH THE DISCUSSION. AND I CAN — WE CAN REFERENCE THEM AT ANY TIME. AT THIS TIME, I WILL HAVE THE AGENT COME UP AND ADDRESS THE BOA BOARD. >> GOOD EVENING, ALEX ENGLEMAN, THE OWNER. >> ADRIENNE TIMMEL, ALSO HONOR. >> WE TRIED TO WORK HARD TO ADDRESS YOUR PRIOR COMMENTS AND CONCERNS. OUR DESIRE IS TO PRESERVE OUR HOME AND PROTECT IT FROM FLOODWATERS AND CREATE A SAFE SPACE FOR OUR FAMILY. IN DOING SO, WE HAVE ENGAGED WITH SILT DESIGN ARCHITECTURAL FIRM TO HELP THAT. FITTING THAT WE FEATURED YBOR CITY WHERE THEY ARE BASED. WE WORKED HARD TO BLEND THEIR GUIDANCE WITH THE LIFT TEAM FROM JAS FROM WHOM YOU PREVIOUSLY HEARD AND WE WILL TRY TO KEEP IT UNDER OUR THREE-HOUR EXPERIENCE IN AUGUST. WE WILL BE BRIEF, BUT RESPECTFULLY ASK THAT WITH TONIGHT’S MEETING, WE GET APPROVAL FOR THE CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS. AND WE WILL CONTINUE TO WORK WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA STAFF ON ANY CONDITIONS YOU MAY HAVE GOING FORWARD. >> I WILL JUST ADD THAT I HOPE IN THIS PRESENTATION, WHICH I THINK SOUL DESIGN DID A TREMENDOUS JOB WITH AND WE APPRECIATE RON’S GUIDANCE THROUGH THE PROCESS. IT HAS BEEN VERY ITERATIVE AS YOU KNOW. YOU SAW US ON AUGUST, WE HAVE BEEN WORKING ON THIS SINCE JANUARY AND NOW WE ARE MANY MONTHS DOWN THE LINE. BUT WE WANTED TO THANK YOU FOR THE ELEVATION AND ALSO I HOPE THAT YOU SEE WE TOOK ALL OF YOUR COMMENTS TO HEART. AND WE TRIED TO ADDRESS ALL YOUR CONCERNS THAT YOU RAISED LAST TIME. THANK YOU. >> GOOD EVENING. ALL RIGHT. GOOD EVENING. AS INDICATED, THEY HAVE ENGAGED US. INFORM PRINCIPAL OF SOUL DIVINE. HANNAH AND JENNIFER FROM MEMBERS OF THE OFFICE. WE WILL BE GOING THROUGH THE PRESENTATION. AND ANSWER QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAD LAST TIME AND GOING THROUGH THE PRESENTATION THOROUGHLY AS A DESIGN PROCESS. WE ARE HAPPY WE COULD ACTUALLY ASSIST THE OWNERS WITH THIS PROJECT. WE UNDERSTAND THIS PROJECT IS BEGINNING TO SET A PRECEDENT IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD. WE ALSO HOPE THIS WILL HELP FUTURE OPENERS OF HISTORIC BUILDINGS TO PROVIDE A PRECEDENT THAT THEY CAN RESTORE THEIR HOME, RESTORE HISTORIC STRUCTURES AND NOT MAKE IS IT JUST LOOK LIKE A RAISED STRUCTURE AND THAT IS OUR GOAL FROM THE BEGINNING WITH THE CLIENTS. WE UNDERSTAND THE CHALLENGES OF THIS BOARD. THERE WE GO. UP AND DOWN. SEE THAT’S WHY YOU HAVE YOUNGER PEOPLE TO HELP US WITH THE TECHNOLOGY SETTING. SO WE BEGIN THE PROJECT WITH MEETING WITH THE CLIENT. WE ACTUALLY WERE — I SHOULD SAY HAPPY ENOUGH TO ATTEND THE LAST MEETING. YOU KNOW WE PRESENTED AFTERWARDS AND WE WERE ABLE TO HEAR AND BE PART OF THE MEETING. WE FOUND OUT WHAT THEIR GOALS WERE. WHAT WERE THEIR MAIN GOALS FOR THE PROJECT. WE MET WITH RON AND THEIR TEAM AND WHAT THE GOALS OF THE PROJECT. WE UNDERSTAND BOTH THE CITY’S GOALS AND THE CLIENT’S GOALS AND TRIED TO BRING THEM TOGETHER. AT THAT TIME, WE CONFIRMED THIS IS THE FOUR SQUARE STYLE. INDICATED THAT IT DOES HAVE CRAFTSMAN ELEMENTS TO THE FACADE AND THAT WAS KIND OF OUR POINT OF TRYING TO BRING THAT VERNACULAR BACK TO THE HOME WHILE STILL RAISING THE HOUSE. INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH, WHEN WE CONTINUED TO DO RESEARCH IN THE HYDE PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES, THERE IS NO ARCHITECTURAL STYLE FOR FOUR SQUARE. IT IS INDICATED — IT HAS A VERNACULAR STYLE IN IT. THE CRAFTSMAN IS WELL DOCUMENTED IN THIS, BUT WE DID LOOK SPECIFICALLY WHAT WERE SOME OF THOSE INTERESTING ELEMENTS AS WE BEGAN TO RESEARCH IT. SO, PRECEDENT. FOUR SQUARE CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOWS. THE HISTORIC GUIDELINE MAP. WE WENT THROUGH THE NEIGHBORHOOD WITH EXAMPLES. WE WANTED TO HAVE PRECEDENCE OF THE FOUR SQUARE STYLE THAT I WASN’T AS FAMILIAR WITH AS SOME OF THE TRADITIONAL STYLES. SQUARE BALANCED FORM. HALLMARK IS ALMOST A NEARLY PERFECT CUBE OR SQUARE FOOTPRINT. TWO OR TWO AND A HALF STORIES HIGH. ONE OF THE BEST ONES WE FOUND IN THE HISTORIC DISTRICT WAS 912 SOUTH OREGON AVENUE THAT PICKS UP A LOT OF THE STYLINGS OF — THE FACADES ARE USUALLY SYMMETRICAL IN A NOW ROOM STYLE ERGO THE NAME. HIM ROOF WITH A CENTRAL DORMER. LET ME HAVE MY MOUSE HERE. AGAIN, OUR EXIST HOME HAD THAT. IT HAS THE CENTRALIZED DORMER. AGAIN ALL PERFECTLY SYMMETRICAL HOME. SOME OTHER EXAMPLES OF FOUR SQUARE WITH CRAFTSMAN INFLUENCES AT 824. AND A LITTLE MORE CRAFTSMAN WITH 853. STILL SOME ELEMENTS OF THE FOUR SQUARE, BUT, AGAIN, STARTING TO DRIFT OVER TO THE CRAFTSMAN. WE FOUND THAT LANGUAGE DOES TEND TO BLEND A LITTLE BIT BETWEEN THE STYLES. NEXT IS A FULL — FULL FRONT PORCH. THAT WAS PRETTY TRADITIONAL. AGAIN, OREGON DOES IT VERY WELL. ORLEANS EXTENDS A LITTLE BIT FURTHER. BUT OUR EXISTING HOME MEETS THAT THE PORCH IS THE WIDTH OF THE FACADE THAT WAS A PREDOMINANT ELEMENTS. SIMPLE HONORS MATERIALS TYPICAL WITH SIDING, BRICK, STUCCO, COMBINATIONS OF THAT. WIDE TRIM BOARDS, STURDY FRONT PORCH POSTS WHICH IS SOMETHING WE WILL HIT ON AND LASTLY THE CENTRAL ENTRY AND CIRCULATION. THE OREGON HAS IT. THE CURRENT HOME 825 HAS IT. SOME OF THE OTHERS BEGAN TO OFF CENTER THE FRONT DOOR WITH RUDIMENTARY ELEMENTS. WITH THAT DOING RESEARCH, WE CONTINUED DOWN THE PATH. WE LOOKED AT THE HYDE PARK GUIDELINES. JUST VERY QUICKLY, WE FEEL LIKE WE MET ALL THE — THE SCALE — THE SCALE AND THE MASSING, YOU KNOW, WE ARE RAISING AN EXISTING HOME. WE WORKED TO KEEP THE MASSING AND SCALE PROPORTIONATE. WE HAVE A DIAGRAM THAT WE LOOKED AT ALL THE HOUSES LAST TIME SO ANALYZE THE HEIGHT — HEIGHT IN MASSING. LOOK AT THAT LATER. SETBACK, PUTTING THE HOUSE WHERE WE ARE. NO CHANGE IN THE SETBACK AND JUST A NOTE AGAIN AS RON MENTIONED IT, WE GOT APPROVED FOR THE EXISTING HOME IN THE SETBACK. WE ARE NOT WE ARE ASKING FOR NO OTHER ENCROACHMENT. STAYING STRAIGHT UP. FACADE PROPORTIONS. ONE OF OUR GOALS IS TO MAKE IT SIMILAR TO WHAT IS THERE, AND WE WILL GO THROUGH THE MASSING THAT WE HAVE DONE TO TRY TO KEEP IT MORE CONSISTENT TO THE FACADE THAT IS THERE. TRIM AND DETAILS, AGAIN, KEEPING OF THE SAME TRIM AND DETAILS. ENTRANCE IS NOT CHANGING. ROOF FORMS ARE NO CHANGE, AND MAINTAIN THE QUALITY OF OUR DISTRICT IS OUR GOAL. NEXT IS — IN LOOKING AT THE REHABILITATION, WE WILL BE TALKING OF THE FRONT PORCH SPECIFICALLY AND SOME OF THE MATERIALS PRESENTED LAST TIME. WITHIN THE — I BELIEVE THIS IS PAGE — I HAD IT HERE, 78. 78 AT THE REHABILITATION GUIDELINES. IT INDICATES — LET ME GET CLOSER, ADEQUATE DOCUMENTARY AND PHYSICAL EVIDENCE EXISTS, THE FEATURE MAY BE ACCURATELY REPRODUCED. WE WILL GO THROUGH SOME INVESTIGATION THAT WE DID. ONE OF THE FIRST MEETINGS THAT HE AND I WENT TO THE SITE AND STARTED TEARING OUT ADDITIONAL MATERIALS AND WE STARTED DOING SOME INVESTIGATION. ONE OF THE FIRST THINGS WE WENT TO AS TRADITIONAL WITH A PERIMETER OF THE HOME, A BRICK BASE OR WALL OR SOME KIND OF STRUCTURE TO I CAN IT UP. CURRENTLY SURROUNDED BY STUCCO AND WE TOOK A HAMMER AND THAT IS ACTUALLY US. AND THIS IS THE BRICK WE FOUND AT THE BASE. WE OPENED UP SELF-LOC SEVERAL L OF THE PERIMETER AND WITH HIM THERE, THIS WAS PRESENT. ONE OF THE ELEMENTS THAT WE STARTED TO WORK WITH OUR COLOR PALETTE AND MATE MATERIAL PALETTE. YOU CAN SEE IMAGES WHERE WE FOUND DIFFERENT ELEMENTS. SECOND ONE DUG INTO THE FACADE A LITTLE FURTHER. PRECEDENT TYPICAL WITH THESE WERE THE BRICK PERIMETER. BRICK PIERS THAT CAME OUT WOODEN ELEMENTS AND COLUMNS THAT ARE TO SUPPORT THE BEAM STRUCTURE. WE DUG INTO THE BEAM AND THE WALL IN THE BACK SIDE AND STARTED TO GET INTO THERE. WHAT BE FOUND WAS NEWER WOOD. THE ENTIRE PORCH STRUCTURE — WE SAW IT FROM DIGGING THE INSIDE — CALL IT THE STAMPING ONLY THE WOOD. NEWER, PRESSURE-TREATED WOOD. IT WASN’T HISTORIC. WE DUG DOWN AS FAR AS WE COULD AND A PIER STRUCTURE BURIED UNDERNEATH THE HOME AND WALLS PRESSURE-TREATED LUMBER AND NEWER LUMBER AND PATCHED AT DIFFERENT POINTS IN ITS HISTORY AND BUILT TO KIND OF CLAD THE HOUSE AND WHAT WE BELIEVE WHAT WAS THERE WAS SIMILAR TO WHAT YOU SAW WAS A PIER WITH A WOODEN COLUMN STRUCTURE HOLDING THE BEAM. THE BEAM WAS THERE. IT AND TO BE ORIGINAL. MARKINGS OF STRUCTURES THAT WERE EITHER NAILED OR THINGS LIKE THAT THAT DUG ON THE INSIDE AND FASTENED TOGETHER AND WE INVESTIGATED THAT ENTIRE FRONT FACADE. SOME MORE IMAGES OF WHAT WE BEGIN TO LOOK AROUND THE HOUSE. WE REMOVED SOME PALES IN THE OLDER BARRIERS AROUND THE PERIMETER VERIFYING SOME AREAS. ONE THING TO NOTE AND YOU CAN TELL THAT PRETTY EVIDENTLY FROM THE PICTURE, THE CHIMNEY STRUCTURE — THE BRICK DOES NOT MATCH THE HISTORIC. THEY WERE TWO COMPLETELY DIFFERENT COLORS. WE THOUGHT MAYBE IT WOULD BE THE SAME. IT WAS INTERESTING TO FIND OUT THAT THEY DID NOT. JUST TO REITERATE, THIS IS OUR PROPERTY. WE ARE ON BAYSHORE. ONE OF THE THINGS WE ARE GOING TO DISCUSS, AND THIS IS THE SURVEY, IS OUR FLOOD ZONE. OUR FLOOD ZONE IS AE. WE HAD DIFFERENT PRESENTATIONS THAT WE HAVE BEEN THROUGH SPECIFIC TO THIS. AS YOU KNOW WE ARE APPROVED TO GO TO 18. 25 FEET. WE ARE PROPOSING TO COME LOWER OUR DFE IS 12 AND FREEBOARD AT 13. WE ARE PROPOSING COME IN ONE FOOT ABOVE THAT HAVE ADDITIONAL SAFETY AND SECURITY FOR THE CLIENT. THE SECTION NOT USING THE NUMBER YOU KINDLY APPROVED IS ACTUALLY GOING LOWER THAN THAT. WE WANT THE BOTTOM OF THE STRUCTURE TO BE AT 14 AND ESTIMATING ABOUT A 12 FOOT — COULD SORRY, TWO-FOOT STRUCTURE IN BETWEEN GOING TO 16 FOOT ON FINISHED FLOOR. WE WILL SHOW YOU THAT. THAT IS COMING UNDER THE ELEVATION THAT YOU APPROVED LAST TIME. SOME OTHER THINGS OF NOTE, THERE ARE SOME TREES AS INDICATED. WE WILL NOT BE CHANGING THE FOOTPRINT, THEY ARE GOING STRAIGHT UP AS CLOSE AS WE CAN TO THE WALLS THAT ARE HERE. NOW WE ARE GOING TO GET INTO A LITTLE BIT OF THE DRIVE AS RON INDICATED. WE ARE GOING TO BE REQUESTING A CIRCULAR DRIVE. A U-SHAPED DRIVE ON THE FRONT. IN IS THE LOCATION. WE HAVE LOOKED AT IT AND PULLED SOME DATA AS EARLY AS STAMP SPRING OF 2024. AS TYPICAL WITH MOST RESIDENTIAL STREETS RECOMMENDED AND MUST HAVE 1500 VEHICLES A DAY ON A A STREET YOU BACK INTO AND ACCESS. AS OF THIS DATE, THE AVERAGE IS 5116 VEHICLES PER DAY ON THIS STREET. I KNOW THAT THIS SPECIFIC COMMITTEE HAS SEEN THIS A FEW TIMES, EVEN BY US. WE HAVE PULLED, AGAIN, SOME OF THE DATA THAT IS INDICATED AND MAKES SENSE. THE MORNING TRAFFIC, LUNCH AND EVENING TRAFFIC GETTING HOME THE PEAKS AND VEHICLES PER DAY. THIS IS THE VIEW. THIS, AGAIN, IS RIGHT AT THE BEND AS YOU BEGIN TO TURN BAYSHORE AND HEAD — THAT WILL BE WEST. WE ARE, AGAIN, INFLUENCED BY THE INITIAL CURVE WHERE YOU DON’T SEE THE CARS COMING UNTIL THEY MAKE THE FIRST TURN AND THEY BEGIN TO ACCELERATE TOWARD THE HOUSE. AS IT SITS RIGHT NOW, THE ONLY OPTION THAT THE CLIENTS HAVE IS TO BACK INTO THIS STREET. THAT IS A VERY CHALLENGING BACKING-OUT PROCESS. NOT NECESSARILY THE SAFE EPPS AND PROPOSE AN ALTERNATE METHOD AND WE WILL GET NIGHT THAT SHORTLY. A VIEW LOOKING NORTH AND ANOTHER VIEW LOOKING SOUTH. THIS IS WHAT I PRESENTED TO YOU BEFORE. THIS LOOKS AT THE ELEVATION. THAT HAS BEEN UPDATED NOW NOT ELEVATION WE ARE PROPOSING. AT THE TOP IS THE MAXIMUM OF THE HIGH ALLOWED. PROPOSED HEIGHT WITH THE NEW DESANE BROUGHT TO DOWN TOP — TO 20648. AND THIS IS OUR HOME 825. AND YOU ARE LOOKING AT HOUSES MOVING SOUTH. ON THE LOWER AREA, OUR RESIDENCE 825, THIS ONE YOU ARE LOOKING AT HOMES GOING NORTH. EVEN WITH THE FACT THAT WE ARE RAISING THIS HOME WITH SOME OF THE HOMES THAT HAVEN’T, WE STILL FIT WITHIN THE HEIGHT, SIMILAR HEIGHTS, OF SOME OF THE EXISTING HOMES WITHIN THE SITE. I AM GOING TO BRIEFLY GO OVER THE SITE PLAN, AND THEN ASK HER TO COME JOIN ME TO GO OVER SOME OF THE CIVIL PLANS. WE WILL START WITH JUST THE KEY ELEMENTS HERE, WHICH IS — THIS IS THE U-SHAPED DRIVE THAT WE ARE PROPOSING. IT WILL INVOLVE LEECHING TH– LEAVES THE EXISTING CURB CUD. WE RESTORE THE RIBBON DRIVES UP TO THE FRONT GATE AS IT PRETTY MUCH IS NOW. WE WILL BE INFILLING THAT WITH PAVERS AN PRESENT THOSE TO YOU TONIGHT WITH SOME OPTIONS. RESTORING THE SIDEWALK WITH THE HISTORIC 3 X 3 SQUARES AND IMPOSING A SIMILAR SCORING PATTERN TO TIE IN THE CURB CUT INTO THE MAIN BAYSHORE THE NORTH AND THEN TO THE SOUTH. WE WILL TALK OF A WALL STRUCTURE THAT MAKES UP THE EXISTING GRADE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN OUR DRIVE AND THE SIDEWALKS. SO WE WILL HAVE DETAILS TO LOOK AT WITH YOU TODAY. SO, AGAIN, TO REITERATE THE INTENT FOR THIS DRIVE IS ONE, SAFETY. FOR THE CLIENT TO PULL OUT. SECONDARY, THERE ARE IS FOR AMAZON, UBER EATS TO DELIVERIES TO THE HOME THAT CAN BE PULLED YOU HAVE OF BAYSHORE AND NOT PARKED IN FRONT WITH THEIR BLINKERS ARE, COME TO A PLACE THAT IS SAFE AND THEN CONTINUE TO EXIT. WE HAVE INCORPORATED INTO DOWNTOWN HE SIGN AND OUR CIVIL ENGINEER MR. HENRY WILL PRESENT THIS. INCORPORATING AN AREA UNDERNEATH THE HOME FOR ONE OF THE VEHICLES TO PULL OFF OF THE STREET AND GET UNDER THE EXISTING HOME BEYOND THE STATE. WITH THE INTENT OF BOTH OF THOSE CARS WILL BE RESTORED ON THE BACK ASPECT. WITH THAT I WILL ASK MR. HENRY TO COME FORWARD AND CONTINUE TOP PRESENT THE CIVIL. >> I AM HENRY AND WAS TO DO THE SITE ANALYSIS. I REVIEWED THE SITE ELEMENT OF PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS. 9445 SQUARE FEET. PRESENTED 57,447. AS I CALCULATED RIGHT NOW CLOSE TO 50%. IF THERE WILL BE ANY OTHER ELEMENTS, WE WILL HANDSEL THE ON-SITE RECESSION FOR THE HALF INCH OF RAINFALL FOR THE ENTIRE SITE. IF WE EXCEED THAT. AT THE MOMENT WE ARE UNDERNEATH IT AND WE DON’T NEED TO PROVIDE THAT. AS YOU CAN SO THEY YELLOW, HE THE TREES THAT WE ARE GOING TO SAVE. WE DID REVIEW WHAT WAS OUT THERE EXISTING. AND PLACING ANOTHER STRUCTURE IN THE SAME LOCATION WITHOUT IMPACTING THE ROOT SYSTEMS. WE ARE MOVING A FEW TREES THAT ARE CLOSE TO THE STRUCTURE. WE HAVE THEM MARKED UP IN Xs THERE. THERE ARE FOUR OF THEM THAT ARE ON THERE. AS YOU KNOW THE SITE PLAN IS LOCATED IN THE FEMA FLOOD ZONE, AE ELEVATION 12. IT IS IN THE LIMIT OF MODERATE WAVE ACTIONS SO THAT WE WILL HAVE TO DO SOME — SOME BREAKAWAY WALLS THROUGH THE WHOLE THING THERE. IT HAS A LOWER FLOOR FOR THE GARAGE PARKING THAT GOES IN. I KNOW YOU APPROVED GOING TO 1825, BUT SOME OF THE ELEMENTS THAT WE DEVELOPMENT FOR THE SITE AND WE BROUGHT IT DOWN. ALL THE HVAC SYSTEMS UP AT FLOOR LEVEL MEETING THE FLOOD REQUIREMENTS FOR THOSE ELEMENTS. LET’S SEE WHAT ELSE. THERE WE GO. HERE ARE SOME OF THE ELEMENT THAT WE DID TO RAISE THE SITE JUST TO BRING IT UP A LITTLE BIT TO GIVE IT SOME RELIEF FROM THE ELEVATION THAT WAS APPROVED BEFORE. KNEE WALL BY THE MAIN SIDEWALK THAT IS CONSISTENT WITH MOST OF BAYSHORE, THREE STEPS GOING UP, AND THEN THE DRIVEWAY, THE CIRCULAR PORTION OF THAT — IN FRONT OF THAT. BY DOING THAT, ALLOWED THE STAIRCASE TO BE LOWERED SOME TO NOT EXTEND THE STAIRCASE FURTHER OUT. NEXT WILL BE THE MANEUVERING PLAN. APPLIED A PASSENGER CAR COMING IN TO SHOW IT CAN TURN INTO THE PARKING SPACE UNDER THE STRUCTURE. THE STACKING OF OTHER CARS WILL BE FORWARD AND ANOTHER ONE BEHIND IT. ON THIS ONE HERE, SINCE THE SITE WAS IN A FLOODPLAIN, THE CONSIDERATION WILL HAVE TO DO WHETHER WE HAVE TO INCREASE THE VOLUME TO DISPLACE FROM THE FLOOD OR DECREASE IT. FIRST, I ANALYZED IT WITH EXISTING STRUCTURE TO COME UP WITH A VOLUME. I REMOVED THE VOLUME AND CAME UP WITH A CAPACITY — A VOLUME OF DISPLACEMENT. AND THEN WE APPLIED THE NEW ELEMENTS, INCLUDING THE DRIVEWAY AND ANY LITTLE EXTRA GRADING THAT WE HAVE. AND WHEN WE NOW ANALYZED IT, WE CAME UP WITH 12 19. 2 CUBE YOUIC FEET OF EXPORT WE ARE NOT AFFECTING THE FLOODPLANE AND NO NEW SOIL WILL BE BROUGHT INTO THE SITE AND THAT CONCLUDES. >> I WILL QUICKLY GO THROUGH SOME OF THE FLOOR PLANS WITH YOU. THESE ARE EXISTING FLOOR PLANS. THIS IS THE FRONT PORCH WE WILL BE REMOVING AND CREATING NEW. ALSO AN INTERIOR STAIR WITH A DOOR ON THE NORTH SIDE. THAT DOOR IS REMOVED BECAUSE WE WON’T BE ABLE TO GET TO IT AT THIS POINT. BUT WE WILL BE SHOWING YOU A PLAN TO REPLACE THAT STAIR WITH THE NEW STAIR ON THE INTERIOR THAT GOES VERTICAL. SECOND FLOOR, NO REAL WORK. WE HAVE IDENTIFIED THE VARLAND A — VARIANCE AIR THAT YOU ALREADY APPROVED. ALL WALLS WILL BE BREAKAWAY WALLS WITH FLOOD VENTS. ONLY WALL THAT WILL NOT IS THE ONE AROUND US HERE. THIS IS WHETHER THAT EXISTING STAIR IS. WE WILL BE LOWERING IT AND PUTTING ON A FLOODPROOF DOOR. CONCRETE STAIRS THAT WILL PROVIDE THE HISTORIC ACCESS ON THE INSIDE. BEFORE YOU ENTERED A COUPLE OF STAIRS AND ENTERED BUT THAT IS NOT POSSIBLE. WE ARE PLACING WITH INTERNAL AND WE WILL HAVE STRUCTURAL AND THEY HAVE DESIGNED IT TO HAVE THE PROPER WATER LOADS TO MEET THAT REQUIREMENT. REST IS THE REAR PORCH ON THE BACK SIDE. STAIR ACCESS FOR A QUICK ACCESS TO THE BACK AREA. ONE OF THE KEYS THAT WAS MENTIONED IS THE GOAL WAS — PART OF THE ITEMS FOR LOWERING THE HOME WAS TO GET THOSE STAIRS — IF YOU RECALL FROM THE PREVIOUS DESIGN, THEY TURNED AND WENT BACKWARDS. YOU HAD TO KIND OF L SHAPE AROUND. WE WORKED HARD TO LOWER THE STRUCTURE AND WORK THE SITE TO GET ALL THE STAIRS TO FIT CONDITION WITH THAT HISTORIC FACADE. THAT WAS VERY IMPORTANT. THAT BROUGHT THE SCALE OF THAT RAISING DOWN SO IT WASN’T SO MASSIVE ON TO THAT FRONT. PROBABLY THE FIRST TASKS WE TOOK OF WORKING THOSE ELEVATIONS AND HANNAH WILL GO OVER SOME OF THESE IN SECTION WITH YOU. AS YOU CAN SEE THOSE STAIRS THAT START WITHIN THE FOOTPRINT OF THE SITE. THEY GO UP AND HAD A LANDING AND FINISHED AT THE PORCH AND YOU CAN SEE THE ACCESS WITH THE SECOND FLOOR WITH THE STAIRS AND THE NEW RAISED DECK ON THE BOOK WITH THE CIRCULAR STAIR. NOTHING ON THE FLOOR ABOVE ABOVE. A RESTRUCTURE AND PUT IN A NEW ROOF. AND THE 5 V CRIMP THAT WE WILL PRESENT. WITH THAT TURN IT OVER TO HANNAH WITH RENDERINGS. >> I AM HANNAH AS CARLOS MENTIONED. FIRST RENDERING OF THE FACADE HEADED BAYSHORE. STAIRS ARE WITHIN THAT FACADE AND GO FROM THE CENTER POINT TO THAT ENTRANCE AND YOU CREATE THAT CENTRAL ENTRY THAT IS VERY IMPORTANT WITH FOUR SQUARE AND CRAFTSMAN-STYLE HOMES. YOU CAN SEE WE HAVE OUR STUCCO BASE AND BRICK COLUMNS THAT COME UP AND TAPERS UP TO THE SECOND-FLOOR PORCH ENTRY PATIO. AND I WILL JUST KEEP GOING AND I WILL GO INTO MORE DETAIL AS WE GO THROUGH THE FACADES. SO NEXT WE HAVE OUR EAST FACADE. AGAIN, AS I MENTIONED, THE ENTRANCE FACING BAYSHORE. EXISTING TO THE TOP AND PROPOSED ON THE BOTTOM, YOU CAN SEE HOW WE HAVE LIFTED AND REMOVED THAT STUCCO COLUMN, AND NOW HAVE REPLACED WITH BRICK AND STUCCO BASE. SO WE ARE BASICALLY LIFTING THAT BASE UP AND CONTINUING THAT THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE FACADE. AND THEN OUR PROPOSED HEIGHT IS 28 FOOT, 8 FROM THE DFE AND MAXIMUM IS 35 FEET. YOU CAN SEE OUR TRIM WRAPS AROUND THE ENTIRE FACADE. THAT SEPARATES THE NEW FROM THE OLD. WE HAVE BREAKAWAY WALLS IN FRONT OF THE STAIRS AND BEYOND THE STAIRS. THAT WAS A QUESTION THAT WE HAD FROM A PREVIOUS PRESENTATION. SO EVERYTHING IS BREAKAWAY. OUR STAIRS ARE OPEN TREAD. GOING TO THE NORTH IF A IS. COMING NORTH AS YOU COME DOWN BAYSHORE. WE REMOVED THAT DOOR BECAUSE NOT USABLE AS WE ARE LIFTING IT TO THE SECOND FLOOR AND REPLACE IT WITH A WINDOW. CUSTOM WINDOW THAT WILL HAVE HURRICANE SCREENING FOR THE WINDOW TREATMENT. THE EXISTING CHIMNEY HAS REMAINED THE SAME. AND WE ARE REPLACING IT WITH STUCK O– STUCCO WITH THE OPEN BASE HERE AND CAR GARAGE SO YOU CAN TURN AND PARK YOUR CAR HERE AND YOU CAN PARK YOUR CAR HERE OR USE IT AS A TURNING BACK OUT TO BAYSHORE. OUR SOUTH FACADE CURRENTLY ON THE EXISTING PLAN OUR MECHANICAL UNITS HERE BELOW THIS WINDOW AND WE HAVE RAISED IT ABOVE THE DESIGN FLOOD ELEVATION. WE ALSO ADDED THE STUCCO WALLS HERE AND ADDED A BRICK COLUMN WITH FENCING TO KIND OF CREATE THAT PRIVACY. AND EVERYTHING BEYOND THAT FENCING, WE HAVE OPEN LOUVERS WHICH WILL BE ALUMINIUM AND THAT KNEE WALL THAT IS A STUCCO BREAKAWAY BASE AND PROVIDES LIGHT THAT CAN COME INTO THE BUILDING. AND AS I MENTIONED EARLIER, ALL OF THE WALLS WILL BE BREAKAWAY, AND WE HAVE FLOOD VENTS AROUND THE ENTIRE BUILDING. WEST ELEVATION. THIS IS THE BACK ELEVATION FACING O’BRIAN. WE DO NOT HAVE ACCESS TO O’BRIAN. THAT IS WHY THE DRIVEWAY IS IMPORTANT IN THE FRONT. WE HAVE ADDED AN ALUMINIUM STAIRCASE HERE THAT COMES UP TO THE NEW PROPOSED DECK. KIND OF GOING INTO SECTIONS. YOU CAN SEE OUR FRONT ENTRY HERE THEIR GOES UP THE THREE STEPS. WE HAVE OUR BREAKAWAY WALL AND OUR STAIRS IN H. BETWEEN THOSE TWO BREAKAWAY WALLS AN OPENING UNDERNEATH THE STAIR FOR MAINTENANCE PURPOSES. NEW DECK COME UP. AND THIS EXISTING HOUSE IS NOT IN OUR SCOPE AND YOU CAN SEE THE DIFFERENT CALL OF VARIATIONS AND I CAN GO INTO MORE DETAILS WITH THE SECTIONS. MAIN ENTRY ASSOCIATION, THREE STEPS THAT COME UP, SLOPING BRICK PAVERS, TWO BREAKAWAY WALLS ON EITHER SIDE OF THE STAIRCASE THAT COME UP TO OUR DEC DECKING. CONCRETE COLUMN WRAPPED IN BRICK AND THEN WRAPPED IN WOOD. IT COMES UP HERE. THIS FRONT PORCH WILL HAVE TONGUE AND GROOVE WOOD CEILINGS AND ADDED NEW GUTTERS AROUND THE ENTIRE ROOF STRUCTURE AS WE REPLACE THE ROOF. RIGHT NOW IT IS SHINGLES, AND WE WILL BE REPLACING IT WITH METAL, 5V METAL CRIMP. AS I MENTIONED DIFFERENT COLUMN VARIATIONS. I HAVE OF A SECTION OF THE BRICK-WRAPPED COLUMNS AND A SECTION OF THE WOOD COLUMNS IN THE BACK. AND I ALSO HAVE A SECTION HERE OF THE BREAKAWAY WALL WITH THE FLOOD VENT, PARTIAL HEIGHT WALL WALL AND ALUMINIUM LOUVERS THAT COME UP. OUR EXISTING HAVE STRUCTURE IS WOOD. EVERYTHING BELOW IS CONCRETE AND STEEL BEAMS THAT WILL LIFT UP STRUCTURE AND WOOD-FRAMED FLOORING AND WALLS. NEXT WE HAVE OUR DETAIL. AS I HAD MENTIONED EARLIER DURING THE ELEVATIONS, WE HAVE A TRIM DETAIL THAT SEPARATES THE EXISTING FROM THE NEW STRUCTURE. WE HAVE BRICK BELOW. SOME IT BUMPS OUT FARTHER THAN THE BRICK. IT IS ONE FOOT OF TRIM BUMP OUT, AND WE HAVE OUR WOOD SIDING THAT WILL REPLACE THE METAL SIDING ABOVE. THEN WE JUST HAVE OUR FLOOD RATED DOOR THAT WE ARE ADDING IN THE GARAGE. OUR CUSTOM WINDOW THAT WE WILL HAVE HURRICANE SCREEN FOR APPROVAL. AND THIN OUR EXISTING WOOD TRIM WHICH IS SIX NUMBERS AROUND ON THE GROUND FLOOR, THE TRIM WRAPS ALL AROUND, AND THEN THE TOP FLOOR. AND I CAN SHOW YOU AGAIN IN THE ELEVATIONS, WE HAVE A SIX-INCH WOOD TRIM THAT WRAPS TO THE ROOF AND THE WINDOW FOLLOWS. AND THEN IT WILL BE A TRIM THAT WRAPS AND SEPARATES THE ROOF FROM THE WINDOWS. NEXT WE HAVE BREAKAWAY WALL DETAILS AND FOUNDATION DETAILS. WE HAVE PILES AND BREAKAWAY WALLS THROUGHOUT. GOING INTO STAIR DETAILS, AGAIN, WE HAVE THAT GROUND FLOOR STAIR THAT WE ARE PROPOSING FROM THE GROUND FLOOR TO THE SECOND FLOOR. IT WILL BE CONCRETE POURED. AND THEN WE HAVE OUR — OUR CONCRETE WALL ALL THE WAY AROUND THE STAIRCASE AND THE FLOOD-RATED DOOR AND OUR SPIRAL STAIRCASE THAT COMES UP IN THE BACK GOING UP TO THE WOOD DECK THAT WE HAVE. OKAY. ANOTHER DETAIL OF THE FRONT ENTRY STAIRS THAT WE HAVE. THIS WILL BE CON STREET PORCH STRINGER WITH OPEN TREADS. AND THEN WE GO INTO BUILDING FINISHES. SO WE HAVE THREE DIFFERENT COLOR PAINTS THAT WILL BE OUR GENERAL PAINT, OUR TRIM PAINT AND OUR DOOR PAINT. WE HAVE, NEXT, OUR BRICK COLUMNS THAT MATCHES THE BE EXISTING BRICK WE FOUND ON-SITE. >> OBVIOUSLY DIFFICULT TO FIND 100-YEAR-OLD BRICK. WE DID THE BEST WE COULD TO BRING SOMETHING IN THE PALETTE. HAPPY TO PASS IT AROUND OF THE ORIGINAL WITH THE PROPOSED. WE TRIED TO FIND SOMETHING AS CLOSE AS WE COULD WITHIN A SIMILAR PALETTE TO BLEND. >> WE HAVE OUR BRICK PAVERS THAT ARE REPLACING THE DIRT HERE. OUR CONCRETE RIBBON AND BRICK IN BETWEEN AND THAT U-DRIVE IS GOING TO HAVE A HEX PATTERN BRICK THAT WILL CONTINUE AROUND. AND THEN WE HAVE IN THE FRONT PORCH CEILING, WE HAVE WOOD TONGUE AND GROOVE. WE ARE PROPOSING THE NEW METAL V CRIMP ROOF. WHAT JENNIFER IS HOLD WILLING IS UP THE WOOD SIDING THAT WE PARENTED. WE WILL BE REPLACING — SINCE REPLACING THE ROOF MATERIAL, WE WILL BE REPLACING THE SOFFIT OF THE ROOF WHICH WILL BE BEADBOARD. NEXT WE HAVE DETAILED ITEMS. LOUVERS AND OUR IRON FENCE AND GATE TO MATCH. THE RAILING. THE FANS, LIGHTS, SCONCES AND DOWNLIGHTS AND REPLACING THE HYDRO FLOOR VENT DOOR. GOING THROUGH THE RENDERINGS REAL QUICK. >> WE ARE GETTING TIGHT ON TIME, SO SO WE WILL ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE. >> SORRY. OKAY. >> AGAIN, WE WANTED TO THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND TRIED TO PRESENT IN MINUTES WITH 54 SECONDS LEFT AS MUCH INFORMATION THAT WE CAN. WE APPRECIATE YOUR TIME IN THIS. WE HOPE WE COMPILED SOMETHING THAT WE WILL ASK FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS SO WE CAN GET THIS FAMILY, THEIR CHILDREN, BACK IN THEIR HOME SO THEY CAN, AGAIN, START TO USE THIS BEAUTIFUL PROPERTY. AGAIN, OUR GOAL IS ALSOS TO HELP YOU, THE CITY OF TAMPA TO PROVIDE A DESIGN THAT HOPEFULLY CAN BE USED WITH FUTURE HOMES SIMILAR TO THIS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND WE ARE HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE. >>TED KEMPTON: THANK YOU. >>RON VILA: COMMISSIONERS, GOOD EVENINGS EVENINGS,. >>RON VILA: AS CARLOS UNDER KATED I MET HIM AND HIS STAFF NUMEROUS TIMES. THEY BROUGHT HAMMERS AND CROWBARS AND TOOK SOME OF THE FABRIC THAT IS THERE NOW APART TO SHOW WHAT IS UNDER THERE. THERE IS NOTHING UNDER THAT INAPPROPRIATE SIDING. FOUNDATION THAT IS THERE WAS A SKIM COAT OF STUCCO. HE SHOWED YOU SOME OF THE BRICK THAT WAS UNDERTHERE. SO IN PEELING THIS BACK, WE ARE TRYING TO — TO ILLUSTRATE TO YOU THAT NONE OF THE HISTORIC FABRIC IS LEFT BEHIND. WHEN YOU GO TO THE SECRETARY OF INTERIOR STANDARDS, NUMBER 6 ON YOUR STAFF REPORT REFERS TO IF — IF THE REPLACEMENT OF MISSING FEATURES ARE NEEDED, THEN YOU GO THROUGH THE PHYSICAL EVIDENCE THAT THEY PROVIDED IN COMBINATION WITH McCALLISTER FIELD GUIDE IS A PUBLICATION THAT WE USE. SO WE DEFINED THIS STRUCTURE AS AN AMERICAN FOUR SQUARE WITH CRAFTSMAN INFLUENCES. YOU LOOK AT THE WINDOWS THERE, YOU SEE THE CRAFTSMAN INFLUENCES AND YOU HAVE SEE THE COLUMNS THAT ARE THERE AS WELL. JUST GO TO A SECTION HERE OF THE AMERICAN FOUR SQUARE INCH CONVERSATION WITH THE OWNERS AND HIS STAFF. MOVING TO THE CONDITIONS, THIS WAS AN ADDITION, AND THE REQUEST STATED THAT IT WAS A MOTHER’S DAY IF I OCCASION TO THE CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE AND DESIGN DETAILS SO THE DESIGN DETAILS IS WHAT THEY ARE INCORPORATING INTO THE STRUCTURE NOW. I DON’T THINK IT WAS EXPRESSED THOROUGHLY, BUT THEY ARE PUTTING LAP SIDING BACK ON THE BODY OF THE HOUSE. THEY ARE BRINGING IN THE PIERS TO MATCH THE BRICKS THAT WERE FOUND THERE AND COLUMNS TO MATCH WHAT MACKAL ADMINISTER’S REFERENCE WAS PROCEEDING US. SO THE MODIFICATION TO THE? CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE, EFFORT DESIGN DETAILS ARE VERY IMPORTANT. YOU SHOULD BE THOROUGH AND COMFORTABLE MOVING FORWARD WITH THE SITE ELEMENTS. THEY TALK OF THE LITTLE BUFFER WALL IN THE FRONT. KNOWLEDGE IT WAS EXPRESSED. HE WAS RUNNING OUT OF TIME. BUT THEY DO HAVE DETAILS ON THAT. THE HORIZONTAL PORTION OF THE APPROACH. THEY SHOWED THE MATERIALS. THE SIDEWALK THAT IS SENSITIVE TO THE PATTERN IN THE DISTRICT. AND THEN THE ACCESS OFF OF BAYSHORE WE IS VERY CHALLENGING. SOME OF THE CONDITIONS HERE WERE THE RETAINING WALL. I THINK ADDITIONAL DETAILS ARE NEED TO GO THROUGH THE AS MUCHIES, THEY WENT THROUGH THE AS MUCHIES VERY QUICKLY, BUT THEY HAD THE INFORMATION THERE. AND HE BELIEVE ALL THE OTHER ITEMS WERE EXPRESSED IN THE PRESENTATION. ALONG WITH THE FIELD GUIDE, THEY DID SHOW SOME REFERENCES FOR THE FOUR SQUARE AND THE CRAFTSMAN-STYLE HOMES WITHIN THE DISTRICT. SO I WANTED THEM TO EXPRESS THE COMPATIBILITY OF WHERE THEY ARE TAKING THIS STRUCTURE TO SOME OF THE STRUCTURES THAT ARE IN HYDE PARK NOW. THAT CONCLUDES MY PORTION, AND I WILL BE HERE TO ANSWER THEY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. >>TED KEMPTON: THANK YOU, RON. ANYONE IN THE PUBLIC HERE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS PRO PROJECT? >> MY NAME IS MICHAEL SOREK. I OWN THE PROPERTY 825 AND A HALF BAYSHORE, THE HOUSE TO THE SOUTH. I’M NOT TECHNICALLY ASTUTE TO KNOW WHAT KINDS OF DRAINAGE THAT THEY ARE PROVIDING BETWEEN MY HOUSE AND THEIR HOUSE AS FAR AS THE SITE PLAN AND ELEVATIONS. SO MY END CONCERN IS TO MAKE SURE THAT I DON’T END UP WITH A LEAK BETWEEN MY HOUSE AND THEIR HOUSE. >>TED KEMPTON: THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE IN THE AUDIENCE HERE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST? NOT SEEING ANY. WE WILL GO AHEAD AND START WITH QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSIONERS. ON MY RIGHT. >>TIM JONES: ON YOUR SITE PLAN, DO YOU HAVE A TOPO ON THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED FOR THE SITE PLAN? IT LOOKS LIKE YOU GUYS ARE RAISING THE SITE. IT APPEARS THAT YOU GUYS ARE RAISING THE SITE. THE PICTURES WE HAVE CURRENTLY SHOW THAT THE HOUSE IS MAYBE A FOOT HIGHER THAN THE SIDEWALK ON BAYSHORE. BUT. >> SO WE DO HAVE A SITE SURVEY. >>TIM JONES: DOES IT HAVE ELEVATIONS ON IT? >> YES. LET’S GET TO IT HERE. >> AND RIGHT THERE. WE CAN X IT OUT SO WE CAN ZOOM IN. WHAT WE UTILIZE — AND I HAVE THIS HERE, SOME OF THE GRADES. 3. 32 ONE OF THE NUMBERS WE USED AT THE SIDEWALKS. REFERRING THE SIDEWALK TO THE SITE ELEVATION. >>TIM JONES: MY CONCERN IS CURRENTLY 3. 32 AT THE SIDEWALK. AND YOU ARE LOOKING TO RAISE THAT UP AND HOW DOES THAT AFFECT YOUR NEIGHBORS? >> WE ARE NOT GOING TO RAISE THE SIDEWALK. KEEP THE SIDEWALK AS IT IS EXISTING. WE ARE ONLY GOING TO RAISE. RIGHT NOW 3. 32 RIGHT HERE UP WITH YARDS 4. 7 WE DID A BLOW-UP HERE. 3. 32 THAT YOU SEE AND AT THE TOP A 4. 5. SO A VERY SIMILAR GRADE IN ONCE YOU GO UP THOSE STAIRS AT SIDEWALK TO WHAT IS AT THE GRADER. WE THEN CONTINUE TO SLOPE THE SITE TOWARD THE BUILDING AND ACCESSED THE SITE. WHERE THE STAIRS WE GYP AT 5. 25. >>TED KEMPTON: PURPOSE OF THE RETAINING WALL IN THE FRONT? >> BASICALLY IT SLOPES. IT IS TO CREATE THAT RETAINING WALL TO MAKE THAT TRANSITION AND THE SITE SLOPES AT A MUCH SHALLOW LOW SLOPE. THE CUT FELL PLAN FOR YOUR EDIFICATION TO SHOW WE ARE NOT BRINGING ANY SOIL ON TO THE SITE. >>TIM JONES: IN THE ORIGINAL PRESENTATION ASKED FOR THE SETBACK VARIANCES. DID THE HOUSE OF THE HOUSE NEED A VARIANCE FOR EXISTING? >> NO. >>TIM JONES: SO APPEARS THAT YOU HAVE EXTEND THE FRONT OF US FURTHER THAN IT CURRENTLY IS WITH THE STEPS. CURRENT STEPS TWO AND A HALF STEPS FROM THE FRONT OF ITS HOUSE AND NOW GOING TO FOUR FEET. >> CORRECT. >>TIM JONES: TWO FEET AND A FOOT AND A HALF TO THE FRONT. GO AHEAD? >> YES, YOU ARE RIGHT. I AM AGREEING WITH YOU. >>TIM JONES: STILL WITHIN THE FRONT SETBACKS. >> YES, I BELIEVE WE ARE IN THE FRONT SETBACKS FROM THE PROP PROPERTY. WE ARE NOT REQUESTING ANY VARIANCES JONES JONES ONE OF THE PICTURE IS THE FIRE HYDRANT. WHERE IS THAT FIRE HYDRANT LOCATED IN THE SITE PLAN. DOES IT INTERFERE WITH THE DRIVEWAY OR CLOSE TO THE DRIVEWAY? >>TIM JONES: SO DOESN’T INTERFERE WITH YOUR PROPOSED DRIVEWAY. >> WE TOOK THAT INTO CONSIDERATION. >>TIM JONES: THAT’S GREAT. THANK YOU. WHY NOT LOAD THE DRIVEWAY FROM THE REAR. IN ONE OF THE PRESENTATIONS, YOU SAEDZ YOU DIDN’T HAVE ACCESS TO THE ALLEYWAY, BUT DO YOU HAVE ACCESS TO THE ALLEYWAY. IS THERE A REASONS YOUR NOT LOADING VEHICLES FROM THE ALLEYWAY, FROM O’BRIAN. >> THERE IS A CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE THERE. AN ATTACHED CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE WE ARE NOT ADDRESSING. THE DROVE IS TO KEEP IT AS CONSISTENTLY POSSIBLE WITH THE FRONT. >>TIM JONES: MR. VILA, IS THE REAR STRUCTURE A CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE. >>RON VILA: REAR STRUCTURE IS CONTRIBUTING AND TRANSPORTATION HAS REQUIREMENTS COMING OFF OF THAT STREET/ALLEY O’BRIAN. A REQUIREMENT THAT I DON’T BELIEVE THEY CURRENTLY MEET AND DO NOT LOAD FROM THE BACK FOR SAFETY REASONS. >>TIM JONES: OKAY, THANK YOU. YOU WERE MENTIONING FLOOD VENTS. DO WE HAVE A PICTURE OF THE FLOOD VENTS? SORRY, I DIDN’T SEE THAT — I AM SURE YOU SHOWED IT. >> WE HAD IT ON THE ELEVATIONS. YOU WANT TO SEE IT ON THE ELEVATION. >>TIM JONES: A PICTURE OF THE ALL FLOOD DRAIN. AND ONE WE DIDN’T BRING. WE USUALLY DO TOO. IT IS YOUR TRADITIONAL FLOOD VENT. PARENTED THE COLOR OF THE STRUCTURE. SO THE INTENT WILL BE TO BLEND AWAY. THE GOAL IS TO MAKE THEM BLEND AWAY. WE ARE DOING LANDSCAPING AROUND THEM AS WELL THE HORIZONTAL BAND IS SEPARATE WILLING THE OLD FROM THE NEW? >> THAT’S CORRECT. >>TIM JONES: IN THE DETAILS, WHERE IS A THAT STUCCO. >> WE BROUGHT YOU THAT DETAIL BECAUSE AN IMPORTANT ELEMENT IN WORKING WITH STAFF. TO DELINEATE HISTORIC ABOVE AND NEW BELOW. WE WANTED TO SHOW YOU A SECTION RIGHT HERE. SO YOU CAN SEE, THIS IS A THAT STEEL BEAM THAT THE ACTUAL STRUCTURE IS BEING BUILT ON. THIS IS A BUMP OUT. A ONE-FOOT-WIDE — IT IS CALLED A TRIM BAND THAT WILL BE THE LINE AROUND THE ENTIRE STRUCTURE AND VERY VISIBLE. HISTORIC ABOVE. NEW BELOW. I WANTED TO SHOW THAT TO YOU BECAUSE THAT REALLY DOES ENCAPSULATE THAT STEEL BEAM THERE. A TRUE LINE. >>TIM JONES: MADE OUT OF WOOD? >> YES. >>TIM JONES: YOU ARE NOT PLANNING TO CHANGE THE WINDOW? >> NO. THE ONLY ONE THE DOOR BECAUSE WE HAVE TO ADDRESS. >>TIM JONES: OKAY. THAT ARE ALL THE QUESTIONS I HAVE FOR NOW. >> OKAY. THANK YOU. >>DAN MYERS: I DON’T THINK I HAVE ANY QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME. THANK YOU. >>JOHN PROKOP: I HAVE A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS. I GUESS — I WANT TO ADDRESS THE LAST — THE NEIGHBOR COMMENT, WHICH IS THE NEIGHBOR TO YOUR SOUTH AND HOW ANY — WHEN YOU WENT THROUGH ALL THAT GRADING TO MY FELLOW COMMISSIONERS’ QUESTION, YOU STAYED BAYSHORE AND NORTH BUT DIDN’T DISCUSS THE GRADING OR ANY CHANGES TO THE SOUTH THAT WOULD IMPACT HIS PROPERTY. CAN YOU ADDRESS THAT, PLEASE? WE WENT THROUGH THE GRADING ANALYSIS, THE WHOLE SITE FLOWS FROM THE O’BRIAN ALLEYWAY FORWARD TO BAYSHORE. WE MADE THE SITE CONSISTENT WITH THE EXISTING ELEVATIONS WITHOUT ANY GRADE CHANGES BETWEEN THE TWO YARDS. WE COULD ADD A LITTLE ELEMENT TO — OUT A LITTLE SWALE BETWEEN THE PROPERTIES TO KEEP CONTINUING THE FLOW OR AT LEAST KEEP THE WATER FROM ENTERING THE NEIGHBOR’S YARD. >>JOHN PROKOP: YOU WOULD BE WILLING TO DO THAT IN THE DESIGN, TO CREATE SOME SORT OF SWALE TO ENSURE NOT THAT IT IS NOT — I GUESS HIS CONCERN IS THAT IT DOESN’T GATHER THERE. THAT IT CONTINUES TO MOVE. >> CONTINUES TO MOVE, RIGHT. CORRECT. >> WE ARE SPENDING FUNDS ON THE ENTIRE SITE, GRADING THE SITE. SO WE WILL BE HAPPY TO PUT IT AS A CONDITION TO ENSURE THAT THE DETAIL IS APPROPRIATE TO MOVING THE WATER TO PREVENT — YOU KNOW, FOR THE NEIGHBOR’S YARD. >>JOHN PROKOP: OKAY. NOW TO A COUPLE OF THE OTHER — I GUESS MAJOR CONCERNS. CHANGING THE ROOF MATERIAL. WHY? AND UNDER WHAT EVIDENCE DO YOU HAVE TO DO THAT? >> ONE OF THE MATERIALS WITHIN THE HISTORIC DISTRICT BRINGS RESILIENCE. THIS PROJECT IS NOT JUST ABOUT RESTORATION, BUT IT IS ALSO ABOUT RESILIENCE. 5V METAL CRIMP IS A STRONG ROOF BECAUSE OF THIS. THE OWNERS GOING THROUGH A LOT OF EFFORT TO HARDEN ITS HOME WHEEL MEETING THE HISTORIC GUIDELINES. STRONGER ROOF WITH THE FACADES AND THE WINDS TOWARD THAT FACADE. ONE OF THE INTENTS. >>JOHN PROKOP: NO HISTORIC PRECEDENCE. >> TO THIS HOUSE. WE FOUND NO EVIDENCE EITHER WAY IN TERMS OF WHAT WAS ORIGINALLY THERE. OWNER DID LOOK FOR HISTORIC PHOTOS. DIFFICULT TO FIND WHAT WAS THERE PREVIOUSLY AND HE DON’T BELIEVE NAY SANBORN MAPS PROVIDE DATA ON THE ROOF. SOMETHING WITHIN THE HISTORIC DISTRICT THAT HAS BEEN AN APROP Y’ALL MATERIAL. >>JOHN PROKOP: JUST ASKING QUESTIONS. >> YES, SIR. >>JOHN PROKOP: THE SAME QUESTION APPLIES REALLY — OBVIOUSLY YOU DON’T HAVE HISTORIC PHOTOS. YOU DON’T KNOW IF THERE WAS ANY BRICK EXPOSED. BRICK COULD HAVE BEEN COVERED IN STUCCO HISTORICALLY — I SAW PHOTOS OF BRICK FRAGMENTS AND BRICK SHARDS, BUT IS THERE ANY EVIDENCE THAT THERE WERE — THAT THEY WERE EXPOSED TO THE PUBLIC? >> WHEN WE PULLED UP SOME PIECES, TYPICALLY IF YOU PUT METAL LATH, WOULD YOU HAVE SEEN A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF PITTING OR NAILS DRIVEN IN OR EVEN IF THEY PUT UP THAT STUCCO. CAME OFF VERY CLEAN AND I AM HAPPY TO PROVIDE THAT. THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE — THEY WOULD HAVE NEEDED A LATH OF SOME KIND AND DIRECTLY APPLIED. >>JOHN PROKOP: WHY WOULD YOU PUT LATH ON BRICK. >> TO GIVE IT GREATER ADHESION. WITH WEATHERING, A CERTAIN — IF YOU CAN SEE THIS. THIS IS A WEATHER FACADE THAT LOOKED LIKE IT WASN’T HAVING ABRASIONS TO STOP THE STUCCO FROM BEING ANCHORED TO IT. SMOOTH WEATHERED FACADE THAT LOOKS LIKE IT COULD HAVE BEEN THE FINISHED MATERIAL. WE PULLED THE STUCCO OUT AND IT KIND OF FELL OFF AND IT WASN’T KIND OF ADHERED TO THE FACADE OF THE BRICK. USED MORE OF THE JOINTS TO HOLD ON TO THE BRICK. I CAN BRING UP THOSE PICTURES.SO THAT IS — BASE OFFED ON WHAT WE FOUND WITH THE BRICKS THAT WERE LEFT. WE DIDN’T HAVE THAT ANCHORING STRUCTURE OR ADHESION TO IT. >>JOHN PROKOP: IN THE ELEVATION, MY FELLOW COMMISSIONER ALREADY ASKED OF THE FLOOD VENTS. I WILL SKIP OVER THAT. IN THE NORTH ELEVATION OF THE HOUSE, THE BOTTOM OF THE EXISTING CHIMNEY HAS BEEN DEALT WITH IN A DIFFERENT MANNER. WHY IS IT DEALT WITH THAT WAY? >> MEETING WITH STAFF, THE DISCUSSION WAS TO NOT TRY TO REPRODUCE THE BREAK THAT JOINT LINE. AND THE STUCK OV BELOW, THE INTENT TO BE STOCCO BELOW AS ONE PALETTE AND THE RESTORATION ABOVE. BLENDING WITH THE REST OF THE BREAKAWAY WALLS AND EVERYTHING ELSE WE WERE PROVIDING IT SEEMED LIKE THAT WAS A CLEAR JOINT. WE DISCUSSED BRICK AT WITH UNTIME AND IT WAS THOUGHT THAT MAY BE A CLEANER SEPARATION OF TWO MATERIALS. >>JOHN PROKOP: YOU MENTIONED THAT THE NEW FRONT ENTRY STAIRS HAVE BREAKAWAY WALLS. >> YES. >>JOHN PROKOP: SUPPORTING THEM. >> THAT’S CORRECT. >>JOHN PROKOP: WHAT HAPPENS TO THE STAIR TREADS? >> THERE IS A CONCRETE STRINGER. AND JUST PLANKS. I CAN SHOW YOU IN A SECTION IF I CAN HERE. >>JOHN PROKOP: OBVIOUSLY BREAKAWAY WALLS. >> YOU WILL HAVE LEFT IS THE EXPOSED CONCRETE BEAMS THAT ARE HELD UP AND POURED INTO THE STAIRS. YOU WILL SEE A SKELETON. >>JOHN PROKOP: STINGERS AND STAYS. >> CORRECT, AND THEN YOU WILL JUST SEE A SKELETON OF THE STAIRS. >>JOHN PROKOP: YOU ARE TALKING OF CHANGING THE SIDING. DID WE DISCUSS EXACTLY LIKE THE EXPOSURE, THE SIZE, WHAT TYPE OF SIDING YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT PUTTING BACK. >> WE ARE PROPOSING A WOOD SIDING. A WOOD TRIM BOARD, 1 X 6 TRIM BOARD THAT-COVERED.WE WORKED WITH STAFF WITH A TRUE WOOD SIDING.MORE OF A PRESSURE TREATED PRODUCT OF HARD ED TO MEET THE WEATHERING AND A 1 X 6 THAT IS PAINT ON THE HISTORIC PORTION OF THE BUILDING. COMMISSIO >>JOHN PROKOP: YOU MENTIONED FINDING — WHEN YOU APART A PORCH COLUMN YOU FOUND SOME KIND OF EVIDENCE. >> THE PIER. >>JOHN PROKOP: YOU FOUND. WHAT SORT OF EVIDENCE? BECAUSE I DIDN’T SEE ANY PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE IN THE PRESENTATION THAT YOU ARE SHOWING US TO CONVINCE US THAT THERE WAS SOMETHING OF HE WAS OF THERE TOABLELY AND WOULD HELP TO BE FURTHER EXPOSED AND IT SHOWN EVEN TO STAFF IF THAT HAS TO BE. >> CAN YOU SEE THE IMAGES. THIS IS US TO THE INSIDE OF THE PORCH LOOKING DOWN. TO YOUR LEFT, THE I DON’T OUT SEED FACADE THAT YOU ARE SEEING FROM BAYSHORE. AND WE DOWN IN THERE TO TRY TO V INVESTIGATE. THE NEWER WOOD DOWN THERE. IT IS HARD TO SEE AND WE COULD GET MORE PICTURE IT IS IT IS POSSIBLE FROM STAFF. THIS WALL WAS BUILT AS A FRAME WALL IN THE FRONT AND REMOVED THE PIERS. TO THE BEST OF OUR ABILITY GET OUR HANDS ON THERE AND TEAR AS MANY BOARD AS WE COULD. A PERIMETER STRINGER HERE THAT WAS FASTENED DOWN TO THE CONCRETE FOUNDATION IN TERMS OF THE PIERS THEY BURIED. WE LED TO THE FACT THAT THIS IS NOT. THE OLDER WOOD AND THE HISTORIC THAT WILL BE MATCHING SOME OF THE INTERIOR FRAMING APPEARED TO BE NEWER WOOD THAT WE FOUND. >>JOHN PROKOP: THAT PROVES WHAT, A CRAFTSMAN COLUMN. >> THAT THE INTENT IT WAS NOT ORIGINAL TO THE HOME. >>JOHN PROKOP: DO YOU NOT HAVE ANY EVIDENCE OF WHAT WAS. >> WE COULD NOT FIND ANY PICTURE EVIDENCE. >>JOHN PROKOP: ANY EVIDENCE THAT YOU EXPOSED THAT CONVINCED YOU THAT THE TAPERED KRAVCRAFTSMAN COLUMNS WERE THE RIGHT THING TO DO OR THE STYLISTIC — >> CORRECT. WE FOUND OUT WHAT WAS THERE WAS ORIGINAL. WE WERE TRYING TO FIND OUT IF SOMETHING ORIGINAL. TO YOUR.WE FOUND NOTHING EITHER WAY. WE WENT BACK TO THE VERNACULAR WHAT WAS TYPICAL FOR A FOUR-SQUARE HOME AND WHAT WAS THERE EXISTING WAS ADDED TO A ANOTHER DATE. OUR FOCUS WAS TO ADD WHAT IS TRADITIONAL TO THE STYLE OF THE HOME. >>JOHN PROKOP: I HAVE NO FURTHER QUESTIONS. >> OKAY. >>ELENA PARAS KETCHUM: I ONLY HAVE A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS. REGARDING THE AIR CONDITIONING UNIT THAT IS RAISED UP. I UNDERSTAND WHY IT IS RAISED UP. DOES YOUR NEIGHBOR HAVE ANY WINDOWS THAT WILL BE LOOKING ON TO THAT AIR CONDITIONING UNIT? >> NO WINDOW ON THAT SIDE? >> THEY ARE IN THE SAME PLACE THEY WERE BEFORE, BUT TO YOUR. THEY COME STRAIGHT UP AND THE SAME FACADE AS BEFORE. >> AIR CONDITIONERS AND ANYTHING ON YOUR SIDE OF THE PROPERTY? >> NO. >> IT IS A SOLID WALL. >> ON THE SOUTH SIDE, IT IS JUST A SOLID WALL. MY ONLY CONCERN IS THE DRAINAGE IS TAKEN CARE OF. AS FAR AS THE HEIGHT AND THE AC UNITS, THAT SHOULDN’T BE A PROBLEM. >>TED KEMPTON: INTRODUCE YOURSELF ONE MORE TIME. >> MICHAEL SOREK. >>ELENA PARAS KETCHUM: STRIVING ON BAYSHORE WILL YOU SEE THE AIR CONDITION UNITS? >> NO, MA’AM. >> WE HAVE A BUMP OUT. >>ELENA PARAS KETCHUM: IT WILL BE BUMPED OUT AND WILL COVER THEM. THE WINDOW THAT IS NOW TAKING OVER THE DOOR. >> YES. >>ELENA PARAS KETCHUM: THAT WINDOW EXACTLY IN THE STAPLE POSITION WHERE THE DOOR IS? >> IT IS A LITTLE SHORTER BECAUSE OF THE FOUNDATION RAISING AND THE CONCRETE BEAM — BECAUSE WE ACTUALLY GIVE YOU A SECTION THROUGH THAT WINDOW AND NOT THE SAME HEIGHT, BUT THE SAME WIDTH. THAT MAKES SENSE, THOR WHO AREA MOVED UP A LITTLE BIT, LIKE 8, 12 INCHES. >>ELENA PARAS KETCHUM: WAS THERE ANY THOUGHT TO — IT DOESN’T QUITE LOOK IN LINE WITH THE OTHER WINDOWS. IS THERE A REASON WHY YOU COULDN’T RAISE IT UP? OR JUST TO MAKE SURE IT IS DIFFERENTIATED. >> THE INTENT WAS TRY TO RESPECT THAT OPENING. AS YOU SAW WE REPLACED THE STARE ACCESS WITH THE INTERIOR TO KINDS OF PUT IT BACK IN A FEMA-APPROPRIATE MANNER WITH THE DOOR AND EVERYTHING LIKE THAT. THAT WAS KIND OF THE INTENT. BECOMES A LEGACY ITEM. YOU ARE RIGHT, IT IS DIFFERENT, BUT COULD BE THE FACT THAT WAS THE ORIGINAL DOOR WHEN WE RAISED IT. THAT IS HOW WE GOT INTO THE HOUSE. THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN THE DOOR MOST OF THE TIME THAT THE RESIDENT USED BECAUSE IT IS OFF THE DRIVE. HOMAGE OF THE ORIGINAL DOOR. PLAYFUL NOD. USED TO GO IN HERE AND COULD UP. THAT IS INTENT FOR THE CLIENT, TO KEEP IT AS A LEGACY ITEM. >>ELENA PARAS KETCHUM: ONE MORE TIME ABOUT THESE FRONT COLUMNS. >> YES, MA’AM. >>ELENA PARAS KETCHUM: SO WHEN YOU DUG DOWN, YOU SAW BRICK ON THE BOTTOM. I AM NOT AN ARCHITECT, SO I AM GOING TO SAY IT IN MY LANGUAGE. BUT WE DON’T KNOW IF THAT BRICK WENT UP TO ACTUALLY CREATE THE PIERS. >> THAT’S CORRECT. >>ELENA PARAS KETCHUM: WE THINK THAT MAYBE THEY WENT UP. >> THAT’S CORRECT, YES. WE ARE NOT SURE. WHAT WE FOUND WAS ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION INDICATING WHAT WAS THERE WAS NOT ORIGINAL TO THE HOME. IF WE FOUND OLD LUMBER — THAT THEY BUILT THAT ORIGINALLY, WE WOULD HAVE SAID THAT IS ORIGINAL. BUT THE LACK OF — WHEN WE WENT BACK TO THE — TO THE REHABILITATION GUIDELINES, THAT IS WHAT WOULD HAVE BEEN THERE, BUT TO YOUR POINT, WE DID NOT FIND IT THERE. THERE WAS NOTHING THERE THAT WAS ORIGINAL TO THE HOME THAT WE COULD FIND. >>ELENA PARAS KETCHUM: COULD IT HAVE BEEN THAT IF THERE WAS BRICK THERE, IT WOULD HAVE MATCHED THE CHIMNEY? RE RED INSTEAD OF. >> WE DON’T KNOW. ONE THING I CAN SHOW YOU IF I CAN PLEASE GO BACK TO THAT. THEY KNEW THIS WAS DIFFERENT. THIS BAND. WE DIDN’T HIT THE BAND HERE BUT THAT WAS A BRICK BAND AND THIS IS THAT COLORED BRICK THAT YOU SAW THERE. >>ELENA PARAS KETCHUM: THE SAND CO COLOR. >> WE DUG DOWN FURTHER DOWN TO THE PERIMETER. THEY VERY INTENTIONALLY CHANGED THE BRICK AT AT THIS TIME SO TWO COLORS OF BRICK COMING TOGETHER AT THAT JOINT. WE DON’T KNOW WHERE IT BEGAN AND ENDED AND LACK OF INFORMATION ON THE FRONT BUT WE FOUND IN ON THE PERIMETER. >>ELENA PARAS KETCHUM: YOU ARE SAYING THE BOTTOM BOARD, IF YOU TAKE OFF THE BOTTOM BOARD THEN THAT SAND-COLORED BRICK? >> THAT’S CORRECT KETCHUM OKAY. >> JUST LIKE THIS. THAT’S CORRECT. >>ELENA PARAS KETCHUM: DID YOU ALL INVESTIGATE ANY OTHER DESIGN FOR THESE COLUMNS AFTER YOU LIFTED THE HOUSE OTHER THAN BRICK? OR — >> THAT WAS ONE OF THE MATERIALS THAT WHEN WE FOUND IT, THAT WAS SOMETHING THAT WE WANTED TO BRING FORWARD BECAUSE IT WAS PART OF THE ORIGINAL HOME. WHEN WE, AGAIN, DID SOME HISTORIC REFERENCES WITHIN THE DISTRICT, WE FOUND THAT OTHER HOMES — IF I CAN GO BACK, PLEASE, TO THE IMAGE. THAT WAS SOMETHING THAT WE SAW THAT WAS WITHIN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. IT IS WITHIN THE GUIDELINES OF THE STYLE AS WE RESEARCHED THE FOUR SQUARE AND THE CRAFTSMAN. SO AS YOU CAN SEE, WITH SOME OF THESE, THAT MATERIAL AT THE BASE WOULD HAVE BEEN THAT PERIMETER WALL EITHER WITH THE GRILL OR NOT AND THAT PAYMENT THE PIER AT THE FRONT AS ONE OF YOUR ENTRY MOMENTS INTO THE FACADE. IT FIT WITHIN THE VERNACULAR OF THE STYLE. >>ELENA PARAS KETCHUM: SO THE UPPER PART OF THE COLUMN SEEMS PRETTY ORNATE. WOULD IT HAVE BEEN THAT ORNATE GIVEN THIS STYLE OF HOUSE OR PLAINER LIKE 9912 BECAUSE THAT IS A HUGE HOUSE OR 853, DOESN’T HAVE AS MUCH DETAILING, IT LOOK LIKE. >> THIS ONE HAS A PICTURE FRAME DETAIL ARMED THE PERIMETER. >>ELENA PARAS KETCHUM: I SEE THAT HE. >> YES, MA’AM. THIS MORE OR NEAT. LITTLE MORE CRAFTSMAN. THEY HAVE THE PICTURE FRAMING AROUND THE TRIM COLUMN, BUT THEY HAVE MORE KNEE BRACES INCORPORATED. TRIM WORK DETAIL IN THE FACADING. SO WE HAVE LESS ARTICULATION THAN THE OTHER FOUR SQUARE HOME IN THE DISTRICT. WHAT WE PRESENTED WE FELT WAS APPROPRIATE THE STEEL OF THE HOME, AT LEAST USING SOME OF THOSE CONTINUING ELEMENTS OF THE STYLE, OF THE FOUR SQUARE STYLE. >>ELENA PARAS KETCHUM: I HAVE NOTHING FURTHER. >>DAN MYERS: OKAY. ON THAT FRONT ELEVATION, WAS THERE ANY CONSIDERATION OF USING LATTICE INSTEAD OF THE SOLID WALLS SURROUNDING THE — >> YOU ARE REFERRING TO THIS YEAR? >>DAN MYERS: THIS YEAH, AND ALSO ON THE FRONT OF THE STAIR. >> HERE? >>DAN MYERS: YES, ON BOTH SIDES, THE WHOLE THING. >> WE HADN’T. WE KNEW IT HAD TO BE BREAKAWAY. WE DID PROVIDE SOME VENTING ON THE SIDE AS HANNAH PRESENTED, BOTH FOR LIGHT TO COME INTO THAT LOWER LEVEL AND CIRCULATION. BECAUSE IF WATER GETS IN THERE, IT NEEDS TO AIR OUT A LITTLE BIT. THIS ONE WE TRIED — WE WORKED VERY HARD TO CHANGE THE SCALE. THE GOAL WAS TO BRING THAT FIRST STAIR DOWN SO IT READ — IF YOU KIND OF NOTICE THAT THE RAILING ALMOST MATCHES THE FINISHED FLOOR TO TRY TO NOT. TO MAKE THE LINES CLEAN. WE SPENT A LOT OF EFFORT TO TRY TO CREATE CLEAN LINE ACROSS SO IT DEW POINT FEEL LIKE THIS PYRAMIDAL — YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN PYRAMIDAL WITH SO MANY FACADE ELEMENTS THAT IT LOOKED CONFUSING OR — THERE ARE SO MANY THINGS ON THERE. SO WE DID TRY TO SIMPLIFY. THAT WAS A GOAL TO BE HONEST WITH YOU FROM THE PREVIOUS DESIGN OF SIMPLE MOMENTS, LET YOUR EYE GO AWAY FROM THE RAISING OF THE HOUSE AND UP TO THE HOME ITSELF SO THAT BLENDING AWAY — AND WE WORKED HARD WITH THE CLIENT IN TERMS OF COLOR. AGAIN, OUR GOAL IS NOT LOOK AT THE BASE BUT TO LOOK UP TO THE HISTORIC HOME. THAT WAS THE CONCEPT OF THE SL SELECTIONS, THE MATERIAL SELECTIONS, STAINED CEILING, EYES GO UP TO DIMINISH THE IMPORTANCE OF THE DURABILITY ELEMENT OF RAISING THE HOUSE. >>DAN MYERS: OKAY. THANK YOU. I DON’T AGREE, BUT THAT’S FINE. AND NOW TO OF THE — TO THE CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE IN THE BACK. >> YES. >>DAN MYERS: SEEMS TO ME THAT BY AVOIDING TALKING ABOUT THAT BECAUSE IT IS NOT PART OF THIS PROBABLY, IT — IT BEGINS TO SUGGEST THERE IS NO SOLUTION OTHER THAN THE U-DRIVE. AND I THINK THERE COULD QUITE POSSIBLY BE A SOLUTION IN THERE. IS THERE ANY EVIDENCE ON THAT — ON THAT CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE THAT IT-A DOOR GOING ON TO O’BRIAN STREET. >> I CAN’T SPEAK TO THAT BECAUSE NOT SOMETHING WE LOOKED AT TO BE HONEST WITH YOU. WE NEVER INVESTIGATED THE DRIVE TO THE REAR STREET — NOT REALLY AN ALLEY — BUT TO THE REAR STREET, O’BRIAN. THE GOAL IS WAS TO RESTORE THE ORIGINAL RIBBON DRIVE AND TO HAVE AN ACCESS POINT TO GET OFF. >>DAN MYERS: IF YOU DON’T ASK THE QUESTION, THEN YOU NEVER GET THE ANSWER. >>TED KEMPTON: CARLOS, THANK YOU. A VERY THOROUGH PRESENTATION. AT SOMETIMES VERY QUICK. HARD TO FOLLOW. >> 30 MINUTES GALLONS FAST. >>TED KEMPTON: I AM GOING TO START WITH THE BRICK QUESTION, BECAUSE MY FELLOW COMMISSIONER WAS — HAD IT RIGHT BEFORE WHY PICK — YOU HAVE TWO DIFFERENT COLORED BRICKS. WHY PICK THE BRICK HIDDEN VERSUS THE ONE EXPOSED. >> AGAIN, TRYING — THE BRICK THERE AT THE FOUNDATION WAS AT THAT TIME THE FOUNDATIONAL ELEMENT. WE WERE TRYING TO USE THE SAME FOUNDATIONAL ELEMENT TO CREATE THE FOUNDATION FOR THE NEW HOME WAS THE CONCEPT TO IT. WHAT WE FUNDS IN THE HOME. WE HAD A FEELING — I THINK THERE IS BRICK DOWN THERE AND I WILL HAVE TO GO WITH A HAMMER AND PEEL IT AWAY. WHEN WE FOUND IT WE FELT THAT WAS KIND OF THE HOMAGE TO THE ORIGINAL MATERIAL THAT RAISED THE HOUSE OFF THE GROUND AND THAT IS KIND OF WHAT WE CHOSE GOING FORWARD. >>TED KEMPTON: ALL RIGHT. LET’S START WITH THE SITE. SO IF YOU CAN BRING UP THE SITE P PLAN, AND YOU MAY NEED YOUR ENGINEERING CONSULTANT. AND FULL ZOOM IN, PLEASE. WHAT I AM READING THE GREEN HATCTHAT IS ON THE NORTH OR THE BAYSHORE DRIVE. MAKE 3D, BUT INDICATING SLOPE OFF OF THE DRIVE AISLE. >> CORRECT. >>TED KEMPTON: SO THEN WHAT THAT TELLS ME THAT DRIVEWAY IS LEVEL UNDERNEATH THE HOUSE? ANY SLOPE OFF THE DRIVEWAY UNDERNEATH THE HOUSE FROM THE DRIV DRIVEWAY? >> ARE YOU HERE AT THE INTERSECTION SOMETHING IN. >>TED KEMPTON: YES, RIGHT THERE SPECIFICALLY. >> THAT WAS THE ELEVATION DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE SLAB AND — AND WHERE THE DRIVEWAY WAS KICKING UP FROM THAT AREA. I HAVEN’T REALLY FINALIZED THAT AREA COMPLETELY, BUT IT IS GOING TO BE LEVEL OR AT LEAST SLOPED OVER, SIMILAR TO THE OUTSIDE FRONT OF THE — BETWEEN THE SIDEWALK ON THE STREET OVER THERE. WE ARE GOING TO PUSH THAT OUT A LITTLE BIT MORE. >>TED KEMPTON: WHERE I AM COMING ON THAT. IS THAT YOUR PROPERTY LINE WITH BLACK WITH THE TWO POINTS IN BETWEEN NORTH OF THE DRIVEWAY. >> YES. >>TED KEMPTON: HOW ARE YOU COLLECTING THAT WATER THAT IS PUSHING DIRECTLY TO YOUR NEIGHBOR ON THE NORTH. >> TO THE NORTH THE 5.52. IT COMES TO THE SITE. WE ARE COLLECTING NEIGHBOR’S TO THE NORTH DRAINAGE AND THEN GOING DOWN TO THE STREET. >>TED KEMPTON: I SEE THE GREEN IS INDICATED OF A SLOPE AWAY FROM THE DRIVEWAY. >> THE GREEN IS ACTUALLY PERVIOUS AREA. >>TED KEMPTON: I UNDERSTAND THAT, BUT YOU TOLD ME THAT GREEN INDICATED SLOPE. >>. I WAS TALK ABOUT LINE THAT ARE THERE. TALKING ABOUT SLOPE. THE GREEN OR MORE ALES HOLECEK THE PERVIOUS — FROM MY CALCULATION OF THE PERVIOUS. >>TED KEMPTON: PERVIOUS HATCH. I JUST ASKED YOU AND I THOUGHT YOU SAID THAT THE GREEN HATCH WAS INDICATING — FOR EXAMPLE, WHEN WE LOOK AT WHERE THE STAIRS ARE, IS THAT NOT SLOPING AWAY? >> IT IS SLOPING TOWARD THE HOUSE. >>TED KEMPTON: LET’S LOOK WHERE THE STAIRS ARE GOING TO BAYSHORE. >> RIGHT HERE? >>TED KEMPTON: YES. THE GREEN HATCH NORTH OF YOU ARE IN SIDEWALK — ALL RIGHT, JUST TO THE LEFT. WHAT IS THAT GREEN HATCH INDICATING. >> HERE. >>TED KEMPTON: IS THAT NOT THE SLOPE? >> THAT IS SLOPE. >>TED KEMPTON: IF THAT’S SLOPE THERE, SLOPE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE DRIVEWAY? >> ON THE NORTH SIDE. I GOT A LITTLE SLOPE GOING AWAY FROM THE DRIVEWAY THERE IN BETWEEN. BUT BETWEEN THE TWO YARDS IT WILL BE — YOU HAVE A PICTURE GOING UP THE DRIVEWAY. YOU WILL SEE THAT NEIGHBOR TO THE NORTH IS CONSIDERABLY HIGHER AND ACTUALLY CREATES A LITTLE BIT OF A V AND SLOPE OUT. >>TED KEMPTON: BY CODE, YOU HAVE TO COLLECT YOUR OWN WATER. >> THAT’S CORRECT. >>TED KEMPTON: I JUST WANT TO BE CLEAR ABOUT THAT. WHAT WILL BE UNDERNEATH THE HOUSE? >> CONCRETE. >>TED KEMPTON: ENTIRE UNDERNEATH THE HOUSE IS CONCRETE? >> YES. >>TED KEMPTON: HOW ARE YOU COLLECT CAN THE WATER IN THE BACK YARD? IT POOLS THERE — >> THAT’S CORRECT. LITTLE BIT OF A SLOPE. CONTOUR LINE RIGHT THERE BY THE 12-INCH THAT IS SLOPING TO THE NORTH. BACK SIDE OF THE FRAMED GARAGE HAS AS LITTLE BIT OF A NATURAL SWALE. WHEN WE GO TO THE NORTH SIDE OF THE DRIVEWAY, THAT IS GOING TO BE SLOPED ALL THE WAY DOWN TO THE STREET AWAY FROM THE HOUSE. >>TED KEMPTON: YOU ARE INDICATING AN EXISTING PALM TREE JUST NORTH OF YOUR NEW UPPER DECK. ARE YOU COLLECT CAN WATER OUT OF TH THERE? >> WE DO NEED TO WORK A LITTLE BIT ON THAT, YES, I AGREE WITH THAT. >>TED KEMPTON: NOW LOOK AT THE SOUTH SIDE. YELLOW IS AN EXISTING TREE, CORRECT? >> YES. >>TED KEMPTON: MOVE FARTHER TO THE EAST. IS THERE AN EXISTING DRAINAGE PROBLEM ON THE SOUTH SIDE? >> NOT THAT AIM AWARE OF. IS THERE AN EXISTING DRAINAGE PROBLEM? >>TED KEMPTON: I AM AT A DISADVANTAGE BECAUSE I DON’T KNOW HOW BAD THE DRAINAGE PROBLEM IS. >> GO AHEAD. >>TED KEMPTON: I AM ASSUMING YOU ARE NOT CHANGING ANYTHING IN THE POOL AREA SO I AM NOT OVERLY INTERESTED IN THAT. LET’S GO TO THE FRONT — THE MIDDLE AND FRONT YARD. PERFECT. THAT YELLOW IS HE AN EXISTING TREE AND YOU CAN’T DO ANY GRADE WORK AROUND THAT EXISTING TREE. IF THERE IS A DRAINAGE PROBLEM TO THE WEST OF THE EXISTING TREE, HOW ARE YOU SOLVING IT. >> HERE. >>TED KEMPTON: YES. TO THE EAST WITH I IS MY SECOND QUESTION WHICH IS THIS WHOLE EXPERT. YOU ARE JUST UNDER 50%. MY QUESTION IS, EXPLAIN TO ME HOW YOU GOT THIS TO BE AN AZTECS PORT SITE AND EXPLAIN WHERE YOU WILL PUT UNDERGROUND STORAGE IN THE EVENT YOU GOT 51%. >> I ALREADY DONE ANALYSIS ON THAT. BASICALLY THE SOUTH SIDE THAT AREA IS WITH PIPES AND ROCKS IN A ROCK BED. SIM TO A SEPTIC DRAIN FIELD. WE ALREADY ANALYZED THAT. WILL GO UNDERNEATH AND POP OUT OVER HERE IN THIS CORNER. WE WILL GO BRIGHT UP TO THE TREE AND UNDERNEATH THE SIDEWALK A LITTLE BIT. SO I DO HAVE THAT ANALYSIS DONE. BUT YOU ARE RIGHT. >>TED KEMPTON: OKAY. SO THAT IS IN YOUR BACK POCKET IN CASE YOU CAN’T GET FLOW NO WORK AS WELL, RIGHT? >> CORRECT. >>TED KEMPTON: LET’S ALLERGY TO THAT WALL, A DECORATIVE WALL. NOT A RETAINING WALL, BUT A DECORATIVE WALL, RIGHT? IS. >> CORRECT. >>TED KEMPTON: IF THAT WALL WENT AWAY, ALREADY THAT AFFECT THE AMOUNT OF STAIRS YOU HAVE FOR YOUR FRONT HOUSE. >> WE WOULD HAVE TO GET FROM THE SIDEWALK TO 18 INCHES ACROSS 3.22 TO 4.5. THE DIFFERENCE TO MAKE WITH THE ACCESS. THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN THE DIFFERENCE. >>TED KEMPTON: HAVE YOU EXPLORED IS THAT? >> WE HAVE NOT. WE LOOKED AT TOO EGG TO GET — ONE OF THE CHALLENGES FROM THE LAST MEETING IS MINIMIZING BETWEEN FINISHED FLOOR TO THE UPPERS. 18 DOWN TO 16 TO COMPRESS IT SO THE STAIRS DON’T CREATE THE WINGS ON THE SIDE. >>TED KEMPTON: ABSOLUTELY OPINION I APPRECIATE THAT AND I THINK THAT IS THE RIGHT APPROACH. BUT MY QUESTION IS, DOES THE MATH WORK IF YOU DON’T HAVE THAT W WALL. >> IT BECOMES A STEEP ACCESS. >>TED KEMPTON: POTENTIAL THREE COULD WORK. AND THE REAL REASON YOU ARE PUTTING THE WALL IN THERE IS VISUAL. YOU ARE TRYING TO HAVE THAT BE THE FIRST ABSORBING SOME OF THE MASS OF THE BUILDING SOMETHING IN. >> THAT’S CORRECT ALL RIGHT. THAT’S THAT. AND YOUR SIDEWALK COMING OUT OF THE SOUTH STAIRS. >> HERE? >>TED KEMPTON: SEEMS AWKWARD WHERE IT HITS THE DRIVEWAY CONSIDERING THAT YOU — I UNDERSTAND THE NOD YOU ARE HAVING WITH THE CENTRAL STAIRS AND EVERYTHING, BUT DOESN’T SEEM TO BE ANY CORRELATION AND SEEMS ADD IF SOMEBODY — >> WITH WHERE IT IS HITTING THE CURVE. >> YEAH. >> THAT ONE WE LOOKED AT DIFFERENT VARIATIONS OF THE DRIVE. CHALLENGE TO GET ONE WITH A FLUID CONNECTION. IF THAT IS THE ONE YOU WANT US TO LOOK AT. WE DID LOOK AT OPTIONS, KEEPING TO FOUR SQUARE, A INCH DIAGONAL POINT AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. >>TED KEMPTON: TALK ABOUT OPTIONS. HOW WIDE IS THAT DRIVEWAY. PROPOSED. >> 12 FEET. >>TED KEMPTON: CONSTITUTE LOOK AT THE OPTION A THREE-POINT TURN OPPOSED TO TWO APRON AS S. A THREE-POINT TERM WHERE YOU COME IN AND LEFT. >>TED KEMPTON: BACK UP AND GET OUT. >> WE DIDN’T LOOK AT THAT AS AN OPTION. >>TED KEMPTON: WHY DID YOU NOT LOOK AT THAT. A DESIGN. >>THE IDEA FOR DELIVERIES AND THEN WHO COME THROUGH AND CONTINUE. AGAIN, WE PRESENTED BEFORE, THAT WAS ONE OF THE INTENTS TO PROVIDE THAT CONTINUOUS ACCESS POINT. OKAY. GOT IT. OKAY. GOOD ENOUGH. >>TED KEMPTON: LET’S GO TO THE ELEVATIONS. WHAT I WOULD LIKE FOR TO YOU DO IS POINT OUT ON OUR FOUR ELEVATIONS WHERE IG NAG IS METAL, EXPOSED METAL HAND RAIL, ALUMINIUM LOUVERS. >> OKAY. THE FLOOR PLANS HERE. YOU SAID ELEVATIONS? OKAY, HERE WE GO. ON THIS FACADE, ONLY THE FLOOD VENTS THAT ARE DOWN BELOW. THAT’S IT, RIGHT? THIS IS WOOD, WOOD, WOOD, AND WOOD. >>TED KEMPTON: GOTH I– GOT IT. >> ON THIS VENT — >>TED KEMPTON: WITH YOU SCROLL — I KNOW YOU HAVE THE SPIRAL STAIRCASE. I CAN’T SEE IT HERE. OTHER RAILING UNDERNEATH OR GOING TO THE STAIRS? >> PART OF THE CIRCULAR STAIR. LET ME GO TO THAT FACADE. YOU CAN SEE IT ON THE ELEVATION BUT LET ME GO TO THE FACADE. TO KEEP GOING, THESE ARE ALUMINIUM, THAT IS BELOW THE TRIM LINE, THAT HISTORIC TRIM LINE FROM BELOW FOR DURABILITY AND THE BREAKAWAY THAT WILL BREAK AWAY WHEN IT COMES TO FLOODING AND THE FLOOD HERE. MECHANICAL UNITS WITH THE BRACKETS. >> THE BRACKET UNDERNEATH THE MECHANICAL UNITS. THANK YOU. AND HERE ARE CONCRETE WITH WOOD WRAPPING ARMED THEM TO CREATE THAT AT THE TAIL. THIS IS AN ALUMINIUM. HAND RAILS ON THIS PARK WOULD BE ALUMINIUM AND INTENT WOULD BE FOR THIS TO BE WOOD, CORRECT? THE MAIN PORCH WILL MATCH THE FRONT. ONLY ONE ALUMINIUM WILL BE THE PART OF CIRCULAR STAIR. >>TED KEMPTON: WHILE WE ARE ON THIS ONE, WHY THE DIFFERENT DEFENSE SIGNS ON THE COLUMN? >> SOMETHING WHICH WORKED WITH STAFF ON. WE LOOKED AT VARIOUS OPTIONS. WE HOOKED BRICK AND VARIOUS OPTIONS. ONE WAY TO GIVE THE PORCH A LITTLE BIT OF A FEEL AND ASPECT. IT IS IT WAS DISCUSSED THAT THEY ARE SOMETIMES TEMP ON THE PACK PORCHES AND LOOKED AT THE SAME DETAIL TO THAT. AND WE WOULDN’T BE OPPOSED TO THAT IF THAT IS SOMETHING THAT — >>TED KEMPTON: OKAY. ALL RIGHT. SO — CAN YOU GO TO YOUR FRONT ELEVATION THAT HAS — I THINK YOU HAD YOUR BEFORE AND AFTER. ON THE DETAIL FOR YOUR TRIM AND YOUR WINDIES. YOU SHOW CONSISTENT SIX-INCH TRIM ON ALL SIDES. BECAUSE OF OF WHAT IS EXISTING. >> AND WHAT IS TRADITIONAL. SO THE TOP WINDOWS. IT IS HARD TO SEE IN THE 3-D MODEL. THERE IS A TRIM BAND AROUND THE TOP. AND THEY ACTUALLY ENGAGE. THERE IS NO UPPER TRIM. NOT DOUBLE STACKED. JUST ENGAGES THE TOP AND MEETING WITH STAFF THAT WE CEMENT THAT DETAIL SO THE TRIM POCKETED INTO IT AND ENGAGED. WE KEPT THAT SAME KIND OF PROVE FILE AS WE BROUGHT IT DOWN. YES, IT WAS KIND OF WHAT WAS THERE. WHAT WE FOUND. LET ME GO TO THE DETAIL. >>TED KEMPTON: WOULD YOU CONSIDER THAT TRIM DETAIL INDICATIVE OF THE FOUR SQUARE OR CRAFTSMAN. >> PROBABLY MORE FOUR SQUARE. >>TED KEMPTON: IF THAT IS THE CASE. GO TO THE PICTURE OF THE THREE EXAMPLES. SPECIFICALLY THE OREGON HOUSE. ZOOM TO THE WINDOW ON THE OREGON HOUSE. YOU HAVE VARIOUS SIZED WOOD TRIM AND CREATES — >> UPPER, HEADER, TWO SIDES AND THEN A MINIMAL BOTTOM TRIM. >>TED KEMPTON: RIGHT. SOME IF YOU WERE — AGAIN, I AM JUST ASKING WHY WOULD YOU PICK THAT DETAIL AS A CRAFTSMAN DETAIL WHEN THERE IS A — LET’S CALL IT A MORE REFINED DETAIL THAT IS AVAILABLE? >I THINK THAT IS SOMETHING WE WOULD BE HAPPY TO MEET WITH STAFF TO CONTINUE TO REFINE IF THAT IS SOMETHING THAT IS A CONDITION. WE WILL BE HAPPY TO LOOK AT THAT AS A TRIM DETAIL. WE WOULD BE HAPPY TO LOOK AT THIS, YES. >> WE WERE TRYING TO MATCH THE EXISTING — WE WERE JUST TRYING TO MATCH THE EXISTING TRIM WORK. >>TED KEMPTON: IS THAT YOUR PREFERENCE? I MEAN, WE WERE TRYING TO KEEP AS MUCH AS WHAT WE CONTRACT ORIGINAL THE ORIGINAL. >> SIGNIFICANT DISCUSSION WITH STAFF NOT TO HAVE TOO TOUCHDOWN CRAFTSMAN. OWNERS TOO I HAD TO ADD MORE ARTICULATION TO THE FACADE, BUT IT IS A SIMPLER PALETTE. WE ARE HAPPY TO LOOK AT THAT DETAIL AND THE TRIM DETAIL. >>TED KEMPTON: THE BALANCE OF WHAT IS GOING ON BECAUSE YOU ARE TOUCHING EVERY ASPECT OF THE HOUSE. >> WHAT DO YOU KEEP AND WHAT — THAT IS A TOUGH DISCUSSION, YOU ARE RIGHT. >>TED KEMPTON: ABSOLUTELY. LET’S SEE. YOU GOT THAT. GOT THAT. AND THEN — I DON’T THINK I HAVE THAT — WE TALKED OF THE BRICK ON THE FIREPLACE. >> YES. >>TED KEMPTON: OKAY, I THINK THOSE ARE ALL MY QUESTIONS. THOSE ARE YOU WILL MY QUESTIONS. ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS AS SOON AS NOT SEEING ANY, YOU HAVE FIVE MINUTES FOR REBUTTAL. >>ELENA PARAS KETCHUM: SO SIEVE ONE OTHER QUESTION. IS THAT WINDOW DETAIL THE SAME ALL THE WAY AROUND? >> YOU ARE REFERRING TO THE PROPOSED WINDOW DETAIL? >>ELENA PARAS KETCHUM: NO, THE ONE EXISTING ON THE FRONT WHERE YOU SAID IT MEETS UP — >> IT IS ON THE UPPER FLOOR, THE SECOND STORY. >>ELENA PARAS KETCHUM: THE SAME ON THE SIDE? >> YEAH, YOU CAN KIND OF — WELL — >> GO TO THE FIRST PAGE WHERE WE HAVE THE EXISTING — >> YEAH. SEE IT IS HARD TO SEE, THAT IS SOMETHING WE FOUND WHEN WE STARTED REMOVING WITH RUIN. THAT WAS A DETAIL THAT WAS THERE, BUT COVERED UP AT ONE POINT WHEN THEY TREND OUT SOME OF THE DETAILS. THAT IS SOMETHING WE FOUND ON THE NORTH FACADE THAT WE THOUGHT WAS A NICE DETAIL TOO BRING BACK. >>ELENA PARAS KETCHUM: SO WERE THEY ALL THE SAME ALL THE WAY AROUND OR DIFFERENCES AROUND? >>RON VILA: I CAN ELABORATE. I WAS ON-SITE AND WE LOOKED AT THIS. IF YOU LOOK AT WHAT IS ON THE SCREEN NOW. UPPER-STORY WINDOWS. YOU SEE TRIM, HOW IT ELEMENTS DIVE INTO THE SOFT FIT. A TRIM BOARD THAT IS CHARACTERISTIC OF THESE STYLE HOMES THAT THE LEGS OF THE EXTERIOR, THE OUTSIDE VERTICAL MEMBERS, THE TRIM ON THE WINDOWS DIE INTO THAT BANDING THAT IS UP THERE. WHEN YOU HAVE THIS DETAIL HERE, YOU HAVE YOUR HEADER AND THEN CONTINUE WOULD BE INCORPS RATED INTO THAT TRIM THAT IS NOT TYPICAL. SO BY REMOVING THAT HEADER, HAVING THE LEGS ON THE VERTICAL MEMBERS OF THE CASING OF THE WINDOWS DIE INTO THAT IS MORE PERIOD APPROPRIATE AND ALL THE WAY AROUND ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF THIS HOUSE. KEMPTON YOU HAVE FIVE MINUTES FOR REFER BUTTAL IF YOU SO CHOOSE. >> AGAIN, THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. WE UNDERSTAND THIS HAS BEEN A LONG PROCESS, BUT WE HAVE NO FURTHER QUESTIONS AND WILL HEAR WITH WHAT HUFF. >>TED KEMPTON: A THIS POINT, WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING GA AND GO ON FOR DISCUSSION. FLOOR IS OPEN. >>ELENA PARAS KETCHUM: IF I CAN ASK THAT THE PICTURE OF WHAT IT IS SUPPOSED TO LOOK AT BE PLACED JUST FOR PURPOSES OF DISCUSSION. IF SOMEBODY CAN CHANGE THE PICTURE FOR WHERE — IF OH, SURE. SURE. THE FINAL RENDERING. >>ELENA PARAS KETCHUM: YES, PLEASE. AND OUT A LITTLE BIT. >> OH, YOU WANT TO SEE THE WHOLE THING, NOT JUST THE TRIM? OH, OKAY. >>ELENA PARAS KETCHUM: THAT’S IT. >>TIM JONES: SEEMS THEY ARE HEAD AND SHOULDERS ABOVE THE LAST TIME THEY WERE THERE, I STILL THINK THEY ARE SHORT GETTING IT TO THE FINISH LINE — THE GOAL LINE. I AM NOT — I AM NOT UNDERSTANDING THE WHOLE BRICK GOING WITH THAT COLOR, BECAUSE MAYBE ONE DAY IT WAS THERE. MAYBE IT WASN’T THERE. MAYBE IT WAS SHOWING. MAYBE IT WASN’T SHOWING. I AM NOT — I AM NOT FEELING REAL COMFORTABLE WITH THE COLUMNS ABOVE THAT IN THE FRONT PORCH BEING TAPERED. >>JOHN PROKOP: NOT A LOT OF, I GUESS, PRESERVATION. HISTORIC RECONSTRUCTION AS MUCH AS — MORE THAN PRESERVATION. IT IS ALMOST A REDESIGN OF THE FACADE OF THE HOUSE. MATERIALS THAT WE DON’T KNOW THERE WERE OR NOT. GRANTED, NOW IT WASN’T — IT WASN’T A REALLY GOOD EXAMPLE IN ITS GRAND CONDITION, OKAY. IT WAS A BAD EXAMPLE WITH ALL THE METAL SIDING AND THE METAL SOFFITING AND ALL THAT KIND OF STUFF, UNDERSTOOD. >> RIGHT. >> NO ONE KNEW WHAT IT WAS THAT LIKE EVIDENCE OF PEELING THE METAL SIDING AND PEELING OFF THE FRONT PORCH PILASTERS AND UNDERSTAND WHAT WAS UNDERNEATH THERE. IT IS ALL GONE. >>TED KEMPTON: THE TESTIMONY IS IT WAS ADDED. THE TESTIMONY I HEARD OF THE FRONT PORCH. >>TIM JONES: I UNDERSTOOD THAT THE PORCH MUCH WAS THERE IS BUT ADDED STUFF AROUND IT.REFRAMED COLUMNS. COLUMNS WERE THERE BUT NO LONGER THERE — >>JOHN PROKOP: TOOK THEM OFF — >>ELENA PARAS KETCHUM: I THINK THEY SAID THEY DIDN’T KNOW IF EVEN THE BRICK — IF THE COLUMNS WERE BRICK ALL THE WAY UP. >>JOHN PROKOP: IT IS AS REIMAGINING OF WHAT THE HOUSE MAY HAVE BEEN AT ONE POINT IN TIME, AND YET IT IS A CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE. WHICH MAKES IT VERY, VERY DIFFI DIFFICULT. I ME, I GUESS — >>TIM JONES: MY OTHER CONCERN IS TO COMMISSIONERS’ COMMENTS. I AM NOT UNDERSTANDING HOW THEY ARE GOING TO KEEP WATER ON THEIR SITE. DOESN’T SEEM LIKE THAT IS COMPLETELY THOUGHT THROUGH AND SEEMS LIKE THEIR NEIGHBORS WILL SUFFER FROM YOU THIS. I HAVE BEEN ON A COUPLE OF SITES BEFORE WHERE THEY HAD A SWALE THAT DIDN’T DRAIN, AND IT BECAME A SWAMP. AND THAT — >>JOHN PROKOP: CALLED A LINEAR POND. >>TIM JONES: LINEAR WATER FEATURE. >>JOHN PROKOP: UNDERSTOOD. THIS SITE ALREADY HAD DRAINAGE PROBLEMS PICK TEE LON THE SOUTH SIDE. THE ADDITION IS SIX INCHES. ONE CONDITION THAT WE GRANDFATHERED IN, SIX INCHES FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. THAT DOESN’T ALLOW WEST TO EAST. BUT I WOULD HAVE LIKED TO HAVE SEEN A LITTLE MORE — DO A TRENCH HERE. GO UNDERNEATH THE EX-ISTING SLAB OR FOUNDATION OF THE BUILDING UNDERNEATH, AND TOO CREATE A CONTROLLED — AND YOU WERE GETTING AT THAT. A CONTROLLED DRAIN AND FROM WEST TO EAST TO GET IT MORE — >>TED KEMPTON: I THINK THAT CAN BE SOLVED. >>JOHN PROKOP: THEY HAVE BEEN DOING IT IN DOWNTOWN INTERSECTIONS.COUNTRY THAT LITTLE TRENCHING ACROSS THE COOPERATOR TO GET THE CORERS TO DRAIN DOWNTOWN. I JUST WE HAD MORE INFORMATION ON WHAT THE HOUSE WAS ORIGINALLY SUPPOSED TO LOOK LIKE. THE ROOFING. I UNDERSTAND ALL OF THEIR EXPLANATIONS WERE THOUGHT OUT AND OBVIOUSLY — THEY HAVE BEEN THOUGHT ABOUT. NOT LIKE WE SURPRISED THEM WITH EVERY EVER EVERYTHING. >>ELENA PARAS KETCHUM: IF THE BRICK WAS RED — IF THE BREAK MATCH WAS CLOSER TO THE CHIMNEY BRICK COLOR. >>JOHN PROKOP: I AM — >>TED KEMPTON: DAN, DID YOU HAVE OFF COMMENT? >>DAN MYERS: >> IN SPEAKING OF THE ROOF I’M NOT A FAN OF 5V CRIMP ROOF ON BAYSHORE. I FEEL LIKE IT WAS NOT SOMETHING THERE ORIGINALLY BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT PEOPLE RESERVED FOR AGRICULTURE BUILDINGS AND THE BUILDINGS IN THE PACK OF BACK; HOWEVER, BUT THERE IS NO EVIDENCE. NUMBER ONE. NUMBER TWO, WHEN WE LOOK AT THIS — AT THIS RENDERING WHICH IS MORE OR LESS FROM THE — THE VIEW OF THE CAR. YOU ARE NOT GOING TO SEE THE ROOF ANYWAY. >>JOHN PROKOP: I TOTALLY GET T CRANKING THE BUILDING UP AND TO SEE THE ROOF PLAINS ON THE ROOF. >>DAN MYERS: MY ONLY PROBLEM IS STILL WITH THE U-DRIVE. AND — — >>JOHN PROKOP: DIDN’T BRING IT A WHOLE LOT IN QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS BECAUSE WE HAVE ALREADY SEEN THAT BEFORE. AND A PREVIOUS COMMERCIALER WHO IS NOT HERE THIS EVENING WAS VERY ADAMANT WHO WAS VERY CONCERNED AND NO CURB CUT. NO BUENO. HAVING THE TURN AROUND AS YOU BROUGHT UP HAVE A PULL IN, BACK OUT, AND GO RIGHT BACK OUT THE SAME CURB CUT FOR DELIVERIES. >> THEY HAVE THAT DESIGN TWO HOUSES DOWN. >>JOHN PROKOP: SAME ARCHITECT. >>TIM JONES: RIGHT. >>JOHN PROKOP: THE SAME ARCHITECT DESIGNED IT TWO MONTHS AGO. I AM UNCOMFORTABLE AND WE DIDN’T ASK QUESTIONS, BUT I AM UNCOMFORTABLE WITH THE ADDITIONAL CURB CUT BECAUSE DOESN’T GIVE THEM ANY BETTER VISIBILITY UP THE ROAD TO THE NORTH TO COME BACK OUT ORIGINAL CURB CUT. SAME VISIBILITY. NO LESS SAFE. NO ADDITIONAL FEATURE OF PULLING OUT AND HAVING A U-DRIVE. >>DAN MYERS: IT IS POSSIBLE TO HANG ONE’S HAT ON THE — ON THE SINGLE — USING A SINGLE ENTRY POINT IS A SPATIAL RELATIONSHIP THAT CHARACTERIZES THE PROPERTY. AND THIS IS — COMMISSIONER PROKOP A CONTRIBUTING FEATURE. >>DAN MYERS: A CONTRIBUTING FEATURE. >>ELENA PARAS KETCHUM: NOT ADDING THE — A. >>DAN MYERS: NOT ADDING A SECOND ROPZ. >>JOHN PROKOP: DRIVEWAY RIBBON DESIGN IS A CORRECT TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. >>DAN MYERS: YES. >>ELENA PARAS KETCHUM: IF THE THREE POINT — FOR ME IT WILL DETRACT FROM THE HOWLS. I AM NOT CRAZY ABOUT THE U-DROVE. I WOULD WRATH TER GO ALL THE WAY BACK TO THE ALLEY, PERSONALLY. BUT I UNDERSTAND THAT IS NOT UP FOR DISCUSSION. BUT I DON’T KNOW, JUST HAVING A THREE-POINT — LOOKS TOO MODERN TO ME, IT SEEMS LIKE. >>JOHN PROKOP: WHAT WE HAVE SEEN HERE IN THE RENDERING WITHOUT IT FINISHING AND PUTTING A NEW CURB CUT IN. >>ELENA PARAS KETCHUM: TO ME IT SEEMS MORE EARN. >>TED KEMPTON: YOU CAN LEAVE PART OF THAT OUT. >>JOHN PROKOP: THAT RETAINING BALL? THAT RETAINING WALL WILL CONTINUE TO THE EDGE OF THE SITE AND WHATEVER. >>TED KEMPTON: LET’S BACK UP A LITTLE BIT. YOU HAVE OF A LITTLE BIT OF HEARTBURN ITS HISTORICAL — WHAT DID YOU HAVE SAY HAD REPLICATION, REPRODUCTION? >>JOHN PROKOP: A REPRODUCTION. IT IS NOT A RESTORATION. >>TED KEMPTON: WHAT COULD THEY DO DIFFERENTLY TO MAKE IT A RESTORATION SOMETHING IN. >>JOHN PROKOP: WITHOUT MUCH MORE EVIDENCE THAN WE ALREADY HAVE. THE BRICKS WOULDN’T — THAT THE BRICKS WOULD BE STUCCO. THE BRICK WOULD BE PAINTED STUCCO. BRICK PILASTER WOULD BE STUCCO. COLUMNS WOULDN’T BE TAPERED BUT RECTANGULAR. AGAIN THAT IS GETTING NET PICKY, BUT AS A CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE IN A HISTORIC DISTRICT, WE ARE MAKING STUFF UP. OR THE APPLICANT IS MAKE STUFF UP. >> YOU SAID THAT AND I AGREE WITH YOU BUT BASED ON THE INFOR INFORMATION. >>JOHN PROKOP: WHAT IS ACCEPTABLE. WE HAVE THE ORIGINAL HOUSE. THINGS WERE STUCCO $AND PAINTED. AND THE CHIMNEY IS THE ONLY THING EXPOSED B. >>TED KEMPTON: WHAT I AM HEARING IS THE WAY THE STAIRCASE EXPOSED, NO ONE HAS ISSUES. STUCCO BRICK. TAPERED COULDLE LULL VERSUS NOT TAPERED COLUMN, BUT I AM NOT HEARING ANYTHING — >>JOHN PROKOP: AND THE SECOND CURB CUT. >>ELENA PARAS KETCHUM: I DON’T KNOW HOW ELSE YOU GET — I DON’T KNOW HOW ELSE YOU GET INTO THE HOME IF YOU DON’T HAVE THESE. >>JOHN PROKOP: AGAIN, WE ARE HAVING A DISCUSSION. IT WILL NOT HORRIBLE. IT IS REALLY — IT IS LOVELY. IS IT — IS IT A CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE ANYMORE? AFTER ALL IS SAID AND DONE AND REBUILT AND RECONFIGURED AND REROOFED AND REPORCHED AND ELEVATED TEN FEET UP IN THE AIR, WHAT ABOUT ITS ORIGINAL HISTORIC CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE? ALMOST NOTHING. >>DAN MYERS: AND WE ARE — WE ARE STUCK HERE BECAUSE — AND — THE CHANGES ARE NOT SUBSTANTIVE. OR THE CHANGES WE ARE SUGGESTING SOMEWHAT, NOT REALLY SUBSTANTIVE, RIGHT. COULD BE BRICK OR COULD STUCK AND COULD BE BRICK. IT HAS TO BE ELEVATED SO WE CAN’T LEAVE IT WHERE IT IS. SO IN THIS CASE, WE ARE START OF PUTTING A FIG LEAF OVER OUR NEED FOR RESILIENCY VERSUS OUR NEED OF FOR THE PERFECT. >>JOHN PROKOP: CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE TO REMAIN. >>DAN MYERS: CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE TO REMAIN, EXACTLY. WE ALREADY HAVE, GONE DOWN THE ROAD. COMMISSIONER PROKOP PUT IT UP THE SIDE. >>DAN MYERS: RAISE IT. IT IS VERY GOOD THAT THEY WORKED IT OUT SO THE STAIRS DON’T HAVE TO TURN BACK. SO THEY HAVE DONE A LOT OF GOOD HERE. >>ELENA PARAS KETCHUM: SHOULD THE FRONT BE A LITTLE SIMPLER TO MATCH — THE STRUCTURE THAT IS THERE NOW? WHEN YOU LOOK AT IT NOW ALL KIND OF UNIFORM. ONLY THING THAT JUMPS OUT AT YOU OF THE HOUSE IS THE CHIMNEY. NOW IT WILL BE THIS BRICK. >>JOHN PROKOP: WHAT IS THERE NOW IS NOT HISTORIC … AT ALL. IT IS WRAPPED IN ALUMINIUM SIDING IN THAT WONDERFUL PERIOD OF THE ’70s. YOU KNOW — >>TED KEMPTON: YOU CAN DISAGREE AND MAKE AN ARGUMENT OF CLOFRT OF BR– COLOR OF BREAK. ABOUT OF THE SECOND DROVE. ULTIMATELY THE HOUSE IS WHAT IT IS AND COURSE SPONLDZ WITH THE FOUR SQUARE AND THE CRAFTSMAN AND I THINK THEY ARE WALKING A VERY TIGHT BALANCE AND WE CAN ARGUE VERY FINE BIBLES, BUT TO YOUR MOMENT, IT IS NOT GOING TO MAKE A SUB STHANGSAL DIFFERENCE. I WOULD LIKE THE WINDOW TRIM A LITTLE DITCH AND TAMPA DOESN’T MATTER WORK WITH STAFF IF I SO CHOOSE AND CAN PICK THE BRICK KETCHUM IT DOESN’T MATTER BECAUSE NOT HISTORIC IN THE FIRST PLACE. >>TED KEMPTON: GOING OFF A HISTORIC REFERENCE. >>ELENA PARAS KETCHUM: WHAT WAS THERE. >>TED KEMPTON: IF THEY HAD GONE WITH PURPOSE{SUFFIX}LE BRICK, WE WOULD HAVE AN ISSUE WITH IT. EITHER ONE IS FINE. THE CIRCULAR DRIVE, AGAIN, I THINK THE LOT CAN CAHANDLE IT. THEY DID IT WHERE IT WAS A DESIGN THOUGHT WHERE IT WAS SYMMETRICAL TO THE FRONT ESSENTIALLY AND REINFORCES THAT CENTER STEP AND STAIR. >>JOHN PROKOP: I JUST WANTED TO PUT — BRING OUR MISSING COMMISSIONER’S COMMENTS AND CONCERNS TO THE FOREFRONT. >>DAN MYERS: I THINK IT IS VALID BECAUSE IT DOES — I HAVE BEEN LOOKING AT THESE HOUSES ON BAYSHORE WITH THE HISTORIC — THEIR HISTORIC QUALITY. AND, YOU KNOW, THIS WAS A HOUSES THAT HAD A SINGLE CURB CUT. AND SO WE ARE — BUT WHAT HAPPENS IS THAT THAT WHOLE CURB CUT AND THIS WIDE PARKWAY GETS PAVED INSTEAD OF BEING, YOU KNOW, A CONTINUOUS GREEN. AND I THINK THAT — SHALL THAT IS SOMEWHAT OF A LOSS. BUT AS FAR AS I AM DETERMINED, THEY CAN, YOU KNOW — THERE ARE OTHER ISSUES ABOUT THE HOUSE. IT IS NOT — IT IS A — A CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE MOSTLY BECAUSE OF ITS AGE. AND IT IS NOT. YOU KNOW NOT A FINE EXAMPLE OF A FOUR SQUARE. BECAUSE IT HAS BEEN WORKED ON FOR SO LONG THAT WE CAN’T TELL WHAT WAS THERE WE CAN SAY THOSE SIMPLER COLUMNS ARE MORE APPROPRIATE BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT THEY LIKED WHEN THEY THREW UP THAT YOU PORCH. THEY HAD TO REDO THE PORCH EARLY 1956. >> I THINK WHAT WE ARE SAYING IS OKAY. EVERYTHING IS ALL RIGHT. IS THERE ANYTHING THAT WITHER GOING TO PUT IN AS A CONDITION? >>TED KEMPTON: TO ME THE DRAINAGE IS NOT RESOLVED. AND JUST PUTTING DRAIN ARROWS INDICATING THAT THE WATER WILL THROW TOWARD BAYSHORE WILL NOT BE ADEQUATE. >>JOHN PROKOP: DOESN’T PROVE, DOESN’T MAKE THE WATER GO IS THERE? [LAUGHTER] >>TED KEMPTON: SO I WOULD LIKE A CONDITION THAT THE DESIGN IS, YOU KNOW, FURTHER COMPLETE SO THERE WILL BE NO STANDING WATER ON EITHER SIDE. >>TIM JONES: I AGREE WITH DAN, THE CIRCULAR DRIVE, GOING DOWN THE SLIPPERY SLOPE IF WE ALLOW THIS CIRCULAR DRIVE THEN THIS ONE AND ANOTHER ONE AND ANOTHER ONE AND NEXT THING YOU KNOW DRIVEWAYS DOWN BAYSHORE. >>JOHN PROKOP: DID TRANSPORTATION APPROVE THIS? DID WE GET ANY INDICATION THAT IT IS NOT TOO CLOSE TO THE NEXT DRIVEWAY? OR THIS IS AN APPROVED DESIGN OR WILL THAT HAVE TO BE PERMITTED WHETHER WE APPROVE IT OR NOT. >>TED KEMPTON: IF IT DOESN’T GO THROUGH, IT COMES BACK ANYWAY. I THINK IT HAS PLENTY OF ROOM. >>JOHN PROKOP: EVEN TO THE ADJACENT HOUSE’S DRIVEWAY? A MINUTE MUM DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CURB CUTS. >>TED KEMPTON: I HAVE TO SEE THAT ON THE SITE PLAN. BUT, AGAIN, IT TRANSPORTATION REJECTS IT, THAT’S WHAT IT IS. >>ELENA PARAS KETCHUM: IF THEY APPROVE IT. >> IT’S BAYSHORE. >>DAN MYERS: TRANSPORTATION APPROVES WHAT WORKS FOR CARS. >>TED KEMPTON: RIGHT. NOT WHAT IS HISTORIC. ANYBODY WANT TO TRY A MOTION? >>JOHN PROKOP: MAKE SURE I HAVE ALL THE DETAILS. I MOVE TO GRANT OF CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR THE DRAWINGS AND DOCUMENTS OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING ARC-250000-240 AT THE PROPERTY 825 BAYSHORE BOULEVARD WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. THAT THE SITE DRAINAGE WITH SIGNIFICANTLY IMPROVED TO ENSURE THAT ALL AREAS OF THE SITE DO NOT CONTRIBUTE TO ANY KIND OF A STANDING WATER PROBLEM TOO EITHER OF THE NEIGHBORS TO THE NORTH OR TO THE SOUTH. BECAUSE BASED UPON THE FINDING OF FACT, THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE HYDE PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES AND CHAPTER 27 OF THE CITY OF TAMPA ORDINANCES IN — AND MATERIALITY AND HISTORIC APPROPRIATE DETAIL. WE HAVE A MOTION. DO I HEAR A SECOND? >>ELENA PARAS KETCHUM: SECOND. >>TED KEMPTON: A SECOND. A MOTION TO GRANT A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS. ANY DISCUSSION? >>TIM JONES: I AM STILL AGAINST THE CIRCLE DRIVE. I AM STRUGGLING WITH THAT. >>DAN MYERS: FOR ME, IT’S — THIS DRIVEWAY IS A SLIPPERY SLOPE. AN — AND WE JUST HAVE TO BE — YOU KNOW, AT SOME POINT WE HAVE TO SAY NO, AND I THINK IT IS GOING TO HAPPEN HERE FOR ME. >>TIM JONES: I WOULD HATE TO SEE THEIR APPROVAL GET HELD UP BECAUSE OF THE DRIVEWAY. >>JOHN PROKOP: YOU WANT TO AMEND MY MOTION? >>TIM JONES: PUT A CONDITION IN THERE TO REMOVE THE CIRCLE DRIVE, THEN I WOULD BE ON BOARD WITH THAT. >>TED KEMPTON: THAT DOESN’T MAKE ANY SENSE TO ME. I WOULD SAY WE KILL THIS MOTION AND MAKE A NEW MOTION. I THINK AN AMENDMENT MIGHT BE THAT THE APPLICANT IS WILLING TOO REVIEW AND EXPLORE PETITION AN ALTERNATIVE FRONT DRIVEWAY SCHEME THAT DOES NOT CLOUDY TWO. AND EXPLORE THAT WITH STAFF. >>TIM JONES: TIME WINE WITH IT. >>JOHN PROKOP: I WOULD LIKE TO AMEND MY MOTION AND ADD A CONDITION THAT THE APPLICANT REVISIT AND REVIEW WITH STAFF AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE SECOND CURB CUT THAT WOULD STILL ACCOMMODATE THEIR NEEDS AND DESIRES FOR DELIVERY AND IMPROVED SAFETY AND NOT HAVING TO BACK OUT ON TO BAYSHORE. >>TED KEMPTON: LET’S TO MAKE SURE WE ARE CLEAR. THEY ARE EXPLORING OPTIONS. ALTERNATIVE ARE, BUT IT IS NOT MANDATE. >>TIM JONES: I AM OKAY WITH THAT. >>JOHN PROKOP: SO AMENDED. >>TED KEMPTON: A SECOND. >>ELENA PARAS KETCHUM: SECOND. >>TED KEMPTON: OKAY. MAKING SURE WE DON’T HAVE ANY OTHER DISCUSSION GOING ON. ANYTHING ELSE? OKAY. DO YOU GUYS UNDERSTAND THE — THE AMENDMENTS? >> WE DO. >>TED KEMPTON: OR THE CONDITIONS, I SHOULD SAY. >> WE DO. >>TED KEMPTON: AND AND YOU AGREE? WE HAVE A MOTION ON THE FLOOR. I AM NOT SEEING ANY OTHER DISCUSSION. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. LOOKS LIKE THAT WAS UNANIMOUS. CONGRATULATIONS. >> THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. >>TED KEMPTON: THANK YOU FOR YOUR PROJECT. >>RON VILA: GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONERS, RON VILA, STAFF WITH HISTORIC PRESENTATION. NEXT AGENDA AUTO ITEM ARC, 25-0000272 FOR THE ADDRESS OF 725 SOUTH BREVARD AVENUE IN THE HYDE PARK DISTRICT. CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE DATES BACK TO 1906. UNDERLYING ZONING IS RS-60. THE REQUEST IS FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION IN ADDITION TO PRIMARY STRUCTURE, MODIFICATION BY ELEVATING THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE. RENOVATIONS TO THE STRUCTURE WITH SITE IMPROVEMENTS. THERE HAVE BEEN PREVIOUS ACTION ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PARCEL INDICATED ON PAGE THREE OF YOUR STAFF REPORT. THREE VARIANCES. ONE A VARIANCE FROM 25 FOOT TO 8.5 INCHES. ANOTHER VARIANCE APPROVED FOR A STRUCTURAL HEIGHT FROM 35 FOOT TO 39 FOOT, ONE INCH. AND THERE WAS A PRELIMINARY APPROVAL GRANTED AND THAT PRELIMINARY APPROVAL, THERE WERE FOUR CONDITIONS. THEY ARE REFLECTED ON YOUR STAFF REPORT ON PAGE 4. THE APPLICANT IS AWARE OF HOW TO PROCEED THIS EVENING. WE WENT THROUGH A QUICK OVERVIEW, AND THEN HE IS GOING TO GO STRAIGHT INTO THE CONDITIONS THAT WERE ALREADY GRANTED. I JUST BRIEFLY WANT TO GO THROUGH THE PHOTO PRESENTATION. WE START WITH THE ’29 SANBORN MAP. PROPERTY IN QUESTION IS HIGHLIGHTED.IT ALL COMES TO A CORNER THERE ON INMAN, ON BREVARD AND BAYSHORE AS INDICATED ON THE SANBORN MAP. THIS IS OUR VICINITY MAP. YOU SEE THE RED INDICATES THE LOCAL DISTRICT. WE ARE HERE LOOKING AT THE LOCAL DISTRICT. BOUNDARIES. THE PROXIMITY TO BAYSHORE AND SOME OF THE CHALLENGES IT HAS WITH THE WATER THAT COMES IN. HERE YOU HAVE THE BAY, BAYSHORE BOULEVARD AND APEX OF THREAT SEATS MEETING AT THE SUBJECT SITE. JUST TO GET YOU REACQUAINTED WITH THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION, A HIGH-END HOUSE. LAST TIME HE SHOWED SOME PICTURES OF WHEN THE CURRENT OWNER BROUGHT IT AND THE CONDITION THE HOUSE WAS IN AND HOW IT LOOKS TODAY. SO THIS IS THE FRONT ELEVATION. THIS IS THE FRONT AND SLIGHTLY OVER TO THE NORTH THE VEHICULAR ACCESS TOWARD THE PORTE COCHERE. FROM THE APRON, THE SIDEWALK AND THE RIBBON DRIVE THROUGH THE PORTE COCHERE. JUST A LITTLE CLOSER ABOUT THE SECURITY GATE THAT THEY HAVE AT THAT LOCATION CURRENTLY. THIS IS LOOKING AT THE FRONT FACADE. AND THAT NORTH ELEVATION. THERE IS AN ADDITION THAT GOES BEHIND THAT TWO-STORY VOLUME HERE. AND THIS IS THE ABUTTING PROPERTY TO THAT NORTH ELEVATION. JUST TO FOCUS ON THE PERSPECTIVE OF HOW YOU — HOW YOU ENTERTAIN OR ENGAGE WITH THIS HOUSE AS YOU GO DOWN BAYSHORE BOULEVARD. THIS IS FROM A DISTANCE. THIS IS A LITTLE CLOSER HAS A HUGE PRESENCE ON THAT CORNER. — JUST FOCUSING QUESTION OF WHERE THE MECHANICALS WERE GOING TO GO. IT WAS OVER HERE AND THE REAR ELEVATION OF THE PRIMARY HOUSE. AND THE DEPOSIT ATTACHED STRUCTURE JUST FOCUSING ON THE REAR OF THE HOUSE. AND THAT COMPLETES THE PHOTO PRESENTATION WE HAVE OWNER AND THE AGENT HERE TO ADDRESS THE BO BOARD. >>RON VILA: ASK HIM TO PULL IT UP. >> THAT IS THE WRONG PRESENTATION. >>ELENA PARAS KETCHUM: TRY TO EXIT OUT OF IT. CCTV IS COMING TO TRY TO HELP. >> WE ARE HERE PRIMARILY TO PRESENT THE FOUR CONDITIONS IN RESPONSE TO OUR PREVIOUS HEARING. OBVIOUSLY WE HAD SEVERAL APPR APPROVALS. HERE WE GO. ALL RIGHT. HIRED ON SEPTEMBER 8. WE GOT OUR VARIANCE ACE PROVED AS RON MENTIONED. THE FOUR EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR THE CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS AND WE WILL START FROM THE LEAST IMPACTFUL TO IT THE — AND FINISH WITH THE ONE THAT PROBABLY DESERVES THE MOST DISCUSSION, SO THE PROPOSED FLOOD VENT DESIGN, THE ROOF LINE ON THE NORTH HE WILL VATION WHICH WE FAILED — WHICH WAS INCORPORATED IN OUR LAST PRESENTATION, BUT WE FAILED TO PUT PUT IT ON THE DRAWINGS THAT HIGHWAY PRESENTED AND THE WINDOW PLACEMENT ON THE NORTH ELEVATION. SOME CONVERSATION ABOUT ADDITIONAL WINDOWS ON THE NORTH ELEVATION AND THE BIG EPPS ISSUE WAS REALLY THE STAIRCASE DESIGN IN RAISING THE HOUSE HOW WE ARE GOING TOO ADDRESS THE FRONT STAIRS AND THE COMMENTS THAT WERE MADE WERE TO SEE IF WE COULD REDUCE THE VISUAL IMPACT AND REALLY THE MASSING OF THE STAIRS. SO I GOT MY ARCHITECT WITH ME HERE TONIGHT. WE WALKED ON THIS ISSUE AND OUR INTENT IS TO PRESENT THOSE. RON ALREADY SHOWED YOU THE SITE. THE SITE PLAN. YOU CAN SEE WHERE THE STAIRS ARE LOCATED ON THE SITE PLAN. THE STAIRS HAVE CHANGED FAIRLY SIGNIFICANTLY FROM OUR ORIGINAL PRESENTATION. BUT, LIKE I SAID, WE WILL START WITH THE EASIER ONES. PROPOSED FLOOD VENT DESIGN. PRETTY TYPICAL VENT IN A MASONRY WALL. NUMBER TWO IS THE ROOF LINE DETAIL. AND NUMBER THREE IS THE WINDOW LOCATION. THESE ARE BOTH ON THE NORTH ELEVATION. RON DID SHOW AN IMAGE FROM THE NORTH LOOKING BACK AT THE HOUSE. IT IS THE LEAST SEEN ELEVATION OF ALL THE ELEVATIONS ON THE PROPERTY. THE PROPERTY SITS AT THE CORN ERR OF INMAN, BAYSHORE AND BREVARD. THE FRONT ELEVATION, INMAN ELEVATION ARE THE ELEVATIONS THAT ARE SEEING THE MOST. WE ARE DOING A SMALL ADDITION BEHIND EXISTING CONDITIONS THAT ARE ALREADY ON THE HOUSE. BUT THE TWO ISSUES THAT WE NEEDED TO PRESENT, THE ROOF LINE DETAIL. IF YOU ARE LOOKING AT THE PROPOSED ELEVATION, THE REAR PORTION, THE HIGHEST FLOOR. WE DID BUMP THAT — THAT — THAT WALL OUT. AND — WHICH CREATED A NEW ROOFLINE TO DISTINGUISH THAT ADDITION. INITIALLY, WE HAD IT ON THE SAME PLAIN. WE ARE CHANGING THE — WE ARE CALLING OUT THE CHANGES AND THE NEW WORK WITH THE TRIM DETAILS. WE BUMPEDED OUT THE WALL AND GIVEN THE ROOF LINE TO GIVE IT A MORE DEFINITION NEW COMPARED TO WHAT IS EXISTING. AND THEN THE TWO. THE TWO WINDOWS ON THAT — ON THAT FIRST FLOOR OF LIVING, THOSE ARE KNEW. WE HAD A BLANK WALL AND DIDN’T HAVE ANY WINDOWS AND ADDED THOSE WINDOWS ABOVE THE PORTE COCHERE SO YOU CAN SEE THOSE THERE. AS THE ADDITIONS. OH, HERE WE GO. AND THIS WINDOW AND THIS WINDOW. AND WE ADDED A NEW ROOF LINE HE HERE. SO THIS IS THE ELEVATION THAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT. NORTH ELEVATION. THE RENDERING OBVIOUSLY. BUT YOU CAN SEE THE TRIM DETAIL, THE BUMP-OUT OF WALL, THE NEW WINDOWS AND THE ROOF LINE. AND ITEM NUMBER 4 IS THE STAIR DETAIL. AND WE CHANGED THE STAIRS PRETTY SIGNIFICANTLY. YOU CAN SEE WE HAVE A GRAND SET OF STAIRS LEADING UP TO THE HOUSE. AND INITIALLY, WE HAVE PROPOSED WHAT IS ON THE LEFT, WHICH IS CLAD IN STONE ON THE INSIDE AND OUTSIDE. THE STAIRS WERE FLARED OUT TO BE WIDER AT THE BOTTOM. WE HAVE OF REDUCED THE WIDTH OF THE STAIRS. WE HAVE COLUMNS AT THE BOTTOM OF THE STAIRS AND ELIMINATED THE STONE ON EITHER TIDE. WE HAVE LOWERED THE CONCRETE WALL AND COME BACK WITH A WOOD RAILING. THE WOOD IS OBVIOUSLY INDICATIVE OF A LOT OF THE MATERIALS THROUGHOUT THE HOUSE. SO WE WERE TRYING TO — WE LOOKED AT A METAL RAILING AS WELL. BUT I THINK AT THE END OF THE DAY, WE FELT THAT IT WOULD BE INTRODUCING A NEW MATERIAL THAT ISN’T EXISTING ON THE HOUSE, SO WE WENT WITH THE WOOD. YOU CAN SEE IN THE — IN THE ELEVATION ON THE RIGHT THE HORIZONTAL BAND IN THE LAST PRESENTATION AND DISTINGUISHES THE OLD FROM THE NEW. THESE ARE TWO MORE RENDERINGS OF THE NEW STAIRS THAT ARE PROPOSED. AS YOU CAN SEE, WE HAVE REDUCED THE MASSING ON THE STAIRCASE TO TRY TO MAKE IT A LITTLE LESS IMPACTFUL. WE ARE SHOWING THE CONCRETE WALL BELOW THAT WOOD RAILING AS STUCCO. THESE NEED TO BE BREAKAWAY WALLS AND BREAKAWAY STAIRS. SO WE ARE PROPOSING JUST A SMOOTH STUCCO FINISH. IT WILL PROBABLY GROW A VINE ON THAT AS WELL JUST TO REDUCE THE MASSING EVEN FURTHER. WANTEDED TO SHOW IF WITHOUT THE GREENERY. THAT’S IT. THE FOUR CONDITIONS WE WANTED TO PRESENT. SO THAT CONCLUDES OUR PRESENTATION. >>TED KEMPTON: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >>RON VILA: COMMISSIONERS, GOOD EVENING RON VILA, I AM A PLANNER WITH THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION. THERE ARE LETTERS SUPPORT THAT ARE IN YOUR PACKET AS WELL. I WANTED TO PUT THAT INTO THE RECORD. THIS ACTION IS CONSISTENT WITH THE HYDE PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES. PART OF THE APPROVAL WAS GRANTED PREVIOUSLY. THERE WERE CONDITIONS THAT WERE COURT WHERE STANDING. THERE WERE FOUR BULLET ITEMS. YOU SHOULD CONCENTRATE ON THE FOUR BULLET ITEMS AS YOU PROCEED WITH YOUR DISCUSSION THIS EVENING, AND STAFF FEELS THAT ALL OF THOSE ITEMS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. SO I’M HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. >>TED KEMPTON: THANK YOU, RON. WE WILL START ON MY LEFT — EXCUSE ME, ANYONE IN THE PUBLIC HERE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS PROJECT? I AM NOT SEEING ANY. START ON MY LEFT. >>ELENA PARAS KETCHUM: I HAVE A QUESTION FOR STAFF. WHAT WERE THE INSTRUCTIONS WITH — FROM THE LAST MEETING WITH RESPECT TO THE FRONT STAIRCASE? >>RON VILA: TO RE-EVALUATE IT. DISCUSSION WAS, AS I RECALL, IT WAS A LITTLE HEAVY AND THEY WANT IT TO BE A LITTLE BIT LIGHTER. I WORKED WITH HIS TEAM OUTSIDE OF THAT TO COME UP WITH SOME SOLUTIONS. THERE WAS SOME ALTERNATE SOLUTIONS, BUT THIS IS THE ONE THAT ULTIMATELY HE WANTED TO BRING FORWARD AND STAFF THOUGHT OF LOOKING AT THEM ALL, THIS IS COMPATIBLE. DRAWS THE EYE AWAY FROM THAT CENTRAL STAIRCASE COMING UP THE FRONT. I DON’T THINK YOU CAN GET AWAY FROM IT. WE RAISED THE HOUSE, AND IT IS THERE. SO DO YOU DO WE, YOU KNOW, DEAL WITH IT NOW. LOOKING AT WHAT WAS PRIOR THERE. YOU SENT HIM BACK TO WORK WITH HIS TEAM, WHICH HE HAS DONE. THIS IS WHAT HE IS PRESENTING THIS EVENING. >>ELENA PARAS KETCHUM: OKAY. I DON’T HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. >>. >>JOHN PROKOP: SURPRISINGLY, I DON’T HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. >>DAN MYERS: IT — MY QUESTION CONCERNS THE AREA TO THE LEFT OF THE — OF THE NEW STAIRWAY. WAS THAT INITIALLY TO BE A LITTLE LOWER THAN THE REST OF THE PORCH? >> IT IS A LITTLE LOWER THAN THE REST OF THE PORCH. CURRENTLY LOWER. THE SAME EXACT RELATIONSHIP THAT EXISTS TODAY. >> IT’S A STEP DOWN. >>DAN MYERS: EXCUSE ME? >> A STEP DOWN. >>DAN MYERS: OKAY, SIX OR EIGHT INCHES BELOW THE OTHER PORCH. OKAY. ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >>TIM JONES: CAN YOU PUT THE NEW ELEVATION, THE NEW PROPOSED ELEVATION WITH THE WINDOWSES. >> IN THE RENDERING. >>TIM JONES: IN THE — >> THE PLANT. >>TIM JONES: THERE YOU GO. LOOKS LIKE THE THREE WINDOWS ON THE NEW ADDITION ARE HIGHER THAN THE OTHER ONE. IS THAT JUST A RENDERING ISSUE? >> HIGHER THAN … >>TIM JONES: THREE WINDOWS ON YOUR ADDITION APPEAR TO BE TO THE TOP TRIM BOARD AND THE WITH UNTO THE LEFT OF IT IS BARELY TOUCHING THE BOTTOM TRIM BOARD. A RENDERING DETAIL? >> SHOULD BE THE SAME HEIGHT. >> OKAY. ALL RIGHT. AND THEN WHAT MATERIAL ARE THE STAIRS MADE OUT OF? >> THE STAIRS — THE FRONT STAIRS? >>TIM JONES: YES. >> PRECAST CONCRETE STAIRS WITH BREAKAWAY WALLS. >>TIM JONES: THAT’S ALL ITS. >>TED KEMPTON: THANK YOU FOR COMING UP TO LOOK AT IT. THE HOUSE IS BEAUTIFUL. REAL QUICK QUESTION ON THIS NORTH ELEVATION. AND I AM GOING TO ASK THE QUESTION. THE TWO WINDOWS THAT YOU PUT IN THERE, IS THAT — IS THERE A REASON — LIKE IS THAT ROOM STOP RIGHT THERE THE INTERIOR ROOM? >> THE SECTION OF WALL IN BETWEEN THAT WINDOW, THE REAR-MOST WINDOW, THIS WINDOW HERE AND THE DOOR — THIS IS THE KITCHEN. SO THERE IS REALLY NO OPPORTUNITY FOR A WINDOW HERE. BUT, AGAIN, IT IS REALLY, THAT ELEVATION IS REALLY NOT SEEN — >>TED KEMPTON: THAT’S FINE. YOU ANSWERED MY QUESTION. ARE YOU HAPPY WITH THE FRONT STAIRS? >> YEAH, WE ARE HAPPY WITH THE FRONT STARES. WHEN THE ORIGINAL COMMENTS WERE MADE IN THE LAST HEARING, RE– I AGREED WITH, YOU KNOW, THE — THE COMMON OPINION THAT WAS THEY WERE A LITTLE HEAVY. I THINK THEY ARE BETTER NOW, I DO. I THINK THEY ARE LESS IMPACTFUL. THEY ARE NOT QUITE AS HEAVY AS THERM. SO WE EXPLORED INITIALLY METAL, AND IT LOOKED GOOD, BUT IT DIDN’T QUITE LOOK RIGHT. AND I FEEL LIKE WE HAVE COME UP WITH PROBABLY THE BEST SOLUTION POSSIBLE. >>TED KEMPTON: MY LAST QUESTION ABOUT THE STAIRS. DO THEY ATTACH TO THE HOUSE. OR ARE THEY SEPARATE? >> IT WON’T SHOW IT ON THE RENDERING. BUT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT THIS — YOU ARE TALKING OF THE SUPPORTS WALL WHERE IT MEETS THE HOUSE? I AM NOT SURE WHAT YOUR QUESTION. >>TED KEMPTON: THAT OTHER VIEW YOU HAD. >> THE WALL GOES RIGHT TO THE HOUSE. >>TED KEMPTON: ZOOM INTO THE REVISED PROPOSAL. AT THE UPPER PART OF THE STAIR — OR CAN YOU NOT ZOOM IN. >> I AM STRUGGLING OVER HERE. I AM BARELY GET THE CURSOR TO WORK. >>TED KEMPTON: JUST AT THE TOP OF THE STAIRS WITH THE HANDRAIL. >>JOHN PROKOP: YOU ARE LOOKING AT HOW THE HANDRAIL ATTACHES TO THE WALL OR ENDS. >>TED KEMPTON: A POST UP THERE, THE COLUMN? >> YES, THERE IS. FOR SOME REASON — I GOVERNMENT A LITTLE MORE DEFINITION ON THIS SCREEN THAN YOU DO UP THERE, BUT, YES, THE HANDRAIL DOES DIE INTO A COLUMN THAT MATCHES THAT COLUMN DOWN BELOW. >>ELENA PARAS K . >>TED KEMPTON: ITS NOT ATTACHING TO THE EXISTING HOUSE. >> NO. >>JOHN PROKOP: THAT PYLON STAIR AND THAT STAIR ARE THE SAME AND THEY ARE BOTH NEW? >> YES. NO. >>TED KEMPTON: PERFECT. OKAY, ANY MORE QUESTIONS? FIVE MORE QUESTIONS FOR REBUTTAL IF YOU SO CHOOSE. >> I THINK WE ARE GOOD. >>TED KEMPTON: PERFECT. I THINK AT THIS POINT WE WILL CLOSE THIS PORTION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING AND MOVE TO COMMISSIONERS’ DISCUSSIONS. >>JOHN PROKOP: WILL BE THE MOST IMPRESSIVE GRAND VOLUMETRIC — VOLUMETRICALLY STUNNING HOUSE ON BAYSHORE. >>TED KEMPTON: BEAUTIFUL THOUSAND BEGIN WITH. THEY DID A WONDERFUL JOB. >>JOHN PROKOP: INCREASING THE MASS LIKE THAT WILL BECOME SO BIG, SO IMPRESSIVE. AND THAT’S WHY I THINK WE — WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT WE GOT AS MANY THINGS RIGHT AS POSSIBLE. AND I THINK THEY DID A VERY NICE JOB. I AM GOING TO NITPICK A LITTLE BIT, JUST A TINY, TINY, TINY. BUT THE BRAND-NEW ELEVATION THAT CAME BACK DID NOT SHOW WHERE THE FLOOD VENTS. THEY ARE NOT THE ELEVATIONS. WE KNOW THEY WOULD BE THERE AND — I DIDN’T WANT A NITPICK OUT OF THAT, BUT A COMMENT ON THAT TO PUT IN THE ELEVATIONS FOR FINAL APPROVAL BE STAFF. I WOULD MAKE THAT A CONDITION OF THE TIME APPROVAL. BUT OTHERWISE, NO, I MEAN, YOU ARE OBVIOUSLY. THE CLIENT HAS GREAT TASTE. AND I TRIED REALLY, REALLY HARD TO MAKE THIS WORK AND DO IT PROPERLY. >>TIM JONES: I APPRECIATE THE EFFORT THEY PUT INTO THIS. HOUSE IS VERY PROMINENT ON BAYSHORE. THIS HOUSE — EVERYBODY KNOW THIS HOUSE. I THINK THEY HAVE DONE A GREAT JOB OF TRYING TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT MUCH RAISING IT. WE WILL RUN INTO THIS A LOT. ALL THOSE HOUSE ALSO GET RAISED SOMEHOWI THINK THEY HAVE DONE A PRETTY DECENT JOB ON THAT. >>TED KEMPTON: OKAY. DO WE HEAR A MOTION? >>TIM JONES: I WILL MAKE A MOTION. LET’S SEE. I MOVE TO GRANT A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR THE DRAWINGS AND DOCUMENTS PRESENTED A THIS PUBLIC HEARING ARC-25-0000272 FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 725 SOUTH BREVARD AVENUE, WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. THAT THEY LOCATE THE FLOOD CONVENIENCE ON I– VENTS OF THE ELEVATIONS. BECAUSE THE FINDING OF FACT CONSISTENT WITH THE DESIGN GUIDELINES OF THE CITY OF TAMPA FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: DESIGN, MASSING AND SCALE. >>TED KEMPTON: DO I HAVE A SECOND? >>ELENA PARAS KETCHUM: SECOND. >>TED KEMPTON: FURTHER DISCUSSION? NOT SEEING ANY. INCHES ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. GOOD LUCK. >> APPRECIATE IT. >>TED KEMPTON: DO A GOOD JOB, PLEASE. >>JOHN PROKOP: NOW HIRE THE RIGHT CONTRACTOR. >>RON VILA: COMMISSIONERS, GOOD EVENING, RON VILA, PLANNER WITH HISTORIC PRESERVATION. OUR LAST AGENDA ITEM IS ARC-25-0000-318. THIS IS FOR THE ADDRESS OF 820 SOUTH BOULEVARD AVENUE. THIS IS IN THE HYDE PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT. PRIMARY STRUCTURE IS CONTRIBUTING AND DATES BACK TO 1916. ZONING IS RS-60. THE REQUEST IS TWO FOLD. THEY HAVE VARIANCES. THEY HAVE TWO VARIANCES. THEY HAVE A FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM 25 FOOT TO 12 FOOT WITH AN ENCROACHMENT FOR 2.66 FEET FOR EAVES AND GUTTERS WHICH THEY ADDED TO THEIR ACTION BUT DOESN’T CORRELATE TO WHAT THE REQUEST IS AND YOU WILL SEE THAT IN THE DRAWINGS. SOUTH SIDE SETBACK FROM SEVEN FOOT TO SIX FOOT. THIS IS WHERE ENCROACHMENT FOR THE EAVES AND GUTTER OF 2.66 FEET IS IMPORTANT TO ADVERTISE AND SHOW ON THEIR DRAWINGS. THE CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS IS THE REQUEST THIS EVENING ALONG WITH VARIANCES WITH MODIFICATION TO ELEVATING THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE WITH SITE IMPROVEMENT. SO THEY ARE GOING TO GO HOW THAT THE VARIANCES FIRST. IF THE VARIANCES ARE APPROVED, THEY ARE GOING TO THE CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS. THE VARIANCE REQUEST — THE HARDSHIP CRITERIA IS IN YOUR PACKET AND YOU CAN FOLLOW ALONG. AND AT THIS TIME, WE WILL GO THROUGH TPHOTOS. >>TED KEMPTON: I WILL ABOUTY INTERRUPT. YOU I UNDERSTAND AND IT THEY HAVE THREE SEPARATE MOTION BUS WILL WE HAVE THEM DO THE ENTIRE MOTION? >>RON VILA: JUST FOR THE VARIANCES. BECAUSE SOMETIMES WE SEPARATE THEM. IN ONE IF THIS ONE IS NOT GRANTED IT PROBABLY DOESN’T GO FORWARD TO THE CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS. I ASK THAT YOU OPEN THEM TOGETHER. ELSE AWARE HE IS GOING TO SHOW THE SITE PLAN AND ENTER THE HARDSHIP INTO THE RECORD AS WELL. >>TED KEMPTON: PERFECT. THANK YOU. >>RON VILA: SANBORN MAP FROM 1929. WHAT WE ARE LOOKING AT. ALL OF THE PROJECTS THIS EVENING WERE ABOUT THAT SAME AREA THAT GOT HIT BY THE STORMS LAST YEAR. THIS IS ANOTHER ONE. HERE YOU HAVE THE VICINITY MAP. THIS IS ON THE 800 BLOCK OF SOUTH BOULEVARD. AND THEN WE HAVE OUR VICINITY MAP. YOU SEE THE PROXIMITY HERE. AS THIS PROJECT MOVES FORWARD, WE SAW OTHER DWHS EVENING THAT THEY ARE RAISES THE HOUSES SUBSTANTIALLY. THIS ONE THIS EVENING IS LESS THAN FOUR FEET. IN OFF OF BAYSHORE. HE IS GOING TO SHOW YOU THE BASE FLOOD ELEVATION, THE DESIGN NOODLE VATION, THE FINISHED FLOOR. ALL OF THAT WILL BE PART OF HIS PRESENTATION. SO THE IMPACT TO THE STRUCTURE AS IT IS BEING ELEVATED IS NOT AS GREAT WITH THE OTHER ONES THAT YOU SAW. THIS IS THE FRONT ELEVATION. YOU SEE THE NUMBER OF STEPS COMING UP. THE MORE FORMAL ENTRY FEATURE. A LITTLE BIT CLOSER. YOU SEE THE CARE OF THE FRONT PORCH AND THE LACQUER ON THE PORCH AND STEPPING OF THE WELCOME WALLS AS THIS HE COME INTO YOUR COLUMNS AND PIER SITUATION. THE FOUNDATION WITH THE OPEN BRICK LATTICE DETAILING. THIS IS THE SOUTH ELEVATION. THIS FACADE HERE IS SIX FOOT FROM THE PROPERTY LINE AS THEY RAISE THE STRUCTURE, THEY HAVE TO APPLY FOR THE VARIANCE. THE VARIANCE — EXCUSE ME SETBACK IN RS-06 IS SEVEN FOOT FROM THEIR SIDE YARD. THEY DON’T HAVE SEVEN FOOT. THIS IS THE NEED FOR THE VARIANCE AND THE OVERHANGS ARE THE 2.66 FEET THAT ARE ADVERTISED — I WANT TO GO BACK FOR A MINUTE TO I LEFT SOMETHING OUT HERE. BUT AS YOU LOOK AT THE FACADE AS THE HOUSE COMES UP, THE STAIRS COME OUT AND THE REASON FOR THE OTHER VARIANCES. TWO VARIANCES ASSOCIATED WITH LIFTING THE HOUSE. NORTH ELEVATION AND THE FRONT FACADE. SOME HOUSELESS ABUTTING IN THE DISTRICT. MOVING THEIR REAR FACADE OF THE PRIMARY HOUSE. THIS THE VEER, THIS THE SOUTH, THE NORTH, THE SOUTH. THIS IS THE SETBACK THAT YOU ARE ASKING FOR HERE. AND ALSO JUST A LITTLE BIT CLOSER THERE. SO I HOPE THAT I WAS ABLE TO SHOW WHERE THE VARIANCES ARE BEING REQUESTED. THAT CONCLUDES THE PHOTO PRESENTATION AND WE WILL HAVE THE OWNER AND HIS AGENT. >> WE ARE STILL ON THE PREVIOUS PRESEN PRESENTATION. >> GOOD EVENING, BOARD. MY NAME IS MATTHEW VARN. I AM THE AGENT FOR TED AND TERESA FOR 820 SOUTH BOULEVARD. WE ARE — AS RON MENTIONED, WE ARE REQUESTING TWO VARIANCES, BOTH HARDSHIP DRIVEN. ON THE SITE PLAN — GO BACK TO THE SITE PLAN. ON THE SITE PLAN, I HAVE THEM INDICATED. I DON’T KNOW IF YOU SEE MY CURSOR OR NOT, BUT THE FRONT INDICATED HERE AND THE SIDE INDICATED ON THE SITE PLAN HERE. AS WE ARE LOOKING AT THE 1915 SANBORN MAP, WE NOTICED NO STRUCTURES TO THE SOUTH. NO STRUCTURES TO THE NORTH. THIS STRUCTURE THAT ENCROACHING IS RIGHT HERE. THE SOUTH VARIANCE — SO BASICALLY RIGHT HERE, WE NEED A SEVEN-FOOT SETBACK. WE ARE AT SIX-FOOT AND WE HAVE THE ENCROACHMENT OF THE — OF THE SOFFITS. SO WE ARE REQUESTING THE SIDE YARD SETBACK VARIANCE TO FORMALIZE THE EXISTING NONCONFORMITY THAT ORIGINATED IN THE ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION WHICH WAS BETWEEN 1915 AND 1916. WE HAD 1922 ON HERE, BUT WE HAD DONE RESEARCH AND APPEARS IT WAS BUILT BETWEEN 1915 AND ’16. AS DOCUMENT ON THE 1915 SANBORN MAP. THIS CONSTRUCTION PREDATES THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ATE JOINING PARCEL, PORTION OF THE RESIDENCE ON THE SIDE YARD WAS BUILT OF A DISTANCE OF SIX FOOT FROM THE CURRENT SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINE. WHERE APPEAR POLICE CAL KABUL ZONING CODE OF SEVEN FOOT. ACCORDINGLY, A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED FOR THE ABOUT UN-FOOT ENCROACHMENT AND SEVEN-FOOT SETBACK. ALSO REDUCING IT TO THE SIX FOOT FOR THE PORTION OF THIS STRUCTURE ONLY. WE ARE NOT REQUESTING — JUST FOR THIS PORTION. NOT REQUESTING ANY SETBACK ON THE SOUTHERN SIDE, JUST FOR THE QUARTERBACK OF THE STRUCTURE. AND THAT CONCLUDES THE SIDE YARD SETBACK. WE NEED TO STOP THIS AND DO — >>TED KEMPTON: WE WILL DO BOTH TOGETHER. >> ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU. THE BEST FRONT YARD SETBACK. WE ARE SEEKING TO RAISE THE HOUSE. IT IS A MODEST RAISE. NOTHING LIKE WE HAVE SEEN SO FAR. WE ARE SEEKING TO RAISE IT TO THE CURRENT. NOTHING MORE. AND WITH THAT, WE ARE GOING TO NEED TO ENCROACH INTO THAT FRONT YARD SETBACK WITH THE STAIRS FOR THIS PORTION ONLY OF THE WELCOME. SO WE ARE SEEKING A FRONT YARD SETBACK VARRANCE FOR THE PROPOSED STAIRS EXCEEDING THE MAXIMUM PERMIT OF EIGHT-FOOT PROJECTION INTO THE 25-FOOT YARD — FRONT YARD QUARTERBACK, AS SPECIFIED BY SECTION 27-159 OF THE ZONING CODE. THE ENCROACHMENT IS NECESSITATED — NECESSITATED BY THE SCOPE OF WORK THAT INVOLVES ELEVATING THE RESIDENCE FROM THE CURRENT FLOOR OF 8.6 FEET TO MEET THE DESIGN FLOOD ELEVATION OF 12 FEET. EXISTING FRONT PORCH IS LOCATED WITHIN THE 25-FOOT SETBACK, BUT BASED ON THE — ON THE ZONING CODE, WE DO HAVE A PROJECTION SINCE WE ARE BELOW THE THREE-FOOT MARK. ARE THE ADDITIONAL STAIRWAY WILL INCREASE ALL OF THAT ABOVE THAT POINT. THEREFORE, THE VARIANCE TO ALLOW A 13-FOOT ENCROACHMENT INTO THE 25-YARD FRONT YARD SETBACK REDUCING THE SETBACK TO 12 FOOT AT THE GREATEST POINT OF ENCROACHMENT. AND THIS IS A — THIS IS A BLOWN-UP VIEW OF THE — OF THE SITE PLAN. WE ARE KEEPING THE SAME WELCOME SIZE AND EVERYTHING. WE ARE JUST — WE JUST NEED THAT EXTRA SPACE FOR THE FRONT YARD. THE — AND THIS PRETTY MUCH CONCLUDES OUR REQUEST FOR THAT VARIANCE. DO WE NEED TO READ — >>RON VILA: I WOULD. >> LET’S GO AHEAD AND READ THAT I IN. >> YOU WANT ME TO READ THE ENTIRE? OKAY. ALL RIGHT, SO THE FIRST SET — I AM TED SLACK. I AM ONE OF THE OWNERS. SO THE SOUTH SIDE VARIANCE WHICH IS ORIGINALLY BUILT IN 1915 AND ENCLOSED AROUND THE 1920s, WE UNDERSTAND, IT CREATES A VARIANCE ISSUE. SO QUESTION NUMBER ONE, ABOUT THE HARDSHIP, THE VARIANCE REQUEST DUE TO PROPOSED FEMA COMPLIANCE ELEVATION OF THE HOME INCLUSIVE OF ATTACHED SIDE PORCH TO AVOID FUTURE FLOODING. NUMBER TWO, QUESTION ABOUT THE HARDSHIP OR PRACTICALITY. OUR ANSWER IS THE HARDSHIP IS UNDUE AND CREATED BY THE BUILDER WHO FIRST OWNED THE HOME APPROXIMATELY 1915 TO 1916. QUESTION NUMBER THREE, THE VARIANCE IF IF GRANTED WILL NOT SUBSTANTIALLY INTERFERE WITH OTHERS WHOSE PROPERTY WOULD BE AFFECTED. SO OUR RESPONSE IS OTHER PROPERTIES ARE NOT INCREMENTALLY AFFECTED BY THE VARIANCE. THE SIDE PORCH WAS PART OF THE ORIGINAL HOME. CONSTRUCTION AND NEIGHBORS HAVE BEEN MADE AWARE OF THE EXISTENCE AND POSITION OF THE SIDE PORCH SINCE ITS ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION. CONSIDERABLE DISTANCE STILL REMAINS BETWEEN OUR SOUTH SIDE NEIGHBORS AND THE SIDE PORCH. NUMBER FOUR, THE VARIANCE IS IN HARMONY WITH THE CHAPTER ADOPTED BY THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. OUR RESPONSE IS THE VARIANCE WILL PRESERVE THE DESIGN AND INTEGRITY OF THE HOME, THEREFORE IS IN HARMONY WITH THE GENERAL PURPOSE OF THE CHAPTER AND TAMPA ADOPTIVE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. NUMBER FIVE, ALLOWING THE VARIANCE WILL RESULT IN SUBSTANTIAL JUSTICE BEING DONE. AND OUR RESPONSE IS IT ALLOW — ALLOWING THE VARIANCE DELIVERS JUSTICE AND ALLOWS THE CURRENT OWNERS TO KEEP THE ORIGINAL HISTORIC DESIGN OF THE HOME AND NEIGHBORS TO CONTINUE TO BENEFIT FROM THE ORIGINAL AESTHETICS WHICH ARE CONSISTENT WITH OTHER HYDE PARK HOMES. THE PLANNED ELEVATION PROTECTS ITS ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE FROM FUTURE FLOOD DAMAGE. AND THEN FINALLY NUMBER SIX, THE VARIANCE IF GRANTED WILL ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT CONSISTENT WITH DESIGN STANDARDS AND COMPATIBLE TO THE HISTORIC PATTERN OF THE HISTORIC DISTRICT. THE VARIANCE IS SPECIFIC TO A PART OF THE STRUCTURE AND KEEP THE HOME TRUE TO ITS ORIGINAL DESIGN. WHEN BUILT OVER 100 YEARS AGO AND CONSISTENT WITH — WE WERE TOLD IT’S AN AMERICAN FOUR SQUARE HOME. STAFF TOLD US IT’S A DIFFERENT DESIGN. WHATEVER DESIGN IT IS, WE’RE NOT ARCHITECTS. THAT’S OUR FIRST VARIANCE. SECOND? ALL RIGHT. SECOND, THIS IS THE WEST VARIANCE WHICH IS CREATED ONLY IF WE ARE APPROVED TO ELEVATE THE HOME TO THE MINIMUM 12-FOOT DESIGN FOOT ELEVATION REQUIRED BY FEMA AND CITY OF TAMPA. WE WILL BY CODE BE REQUIRED TO ADD ADDITIONAL FRONT STEPS OF COURSE TO THE HIGHER LEVEL HOME. SO QUESTION NUMBER ONE, THE ALLEGED HARDSHIP ARE UNIQUE AND SINGULAR TO THE RESPECT OF THE PROPERTY AND OUR ANSWER IS THE VARIANCE REQUEST IS DUE TO THE PROPOSED FEMA COMPLIANT ELEVATION OF THE HOME AND ATTACHED FRONT PORCH TO AVOID FLOODING. THIS REQUIRES AN ADDITIONAL FIVE FRONT STEPS THAT WILL BRING THE BOTTOM STEP 12 FEET FROM THE SIDEWALK. QUESTION TWO, THE HARDSHIP OR PRACTICALITY DOES NOT RESULT FROM THE ACTIONS OF THE APPLICANT. CLEARLY OUR ANSWER IS THE HARDSHIP IS UNDUE AND CREATED BY THE ORIGINAL BUILDER OF THE HOME BACK — APPROXIMATELY 1915. NUMBER THREE, THE VARIANCE IF GRANTED WILL NOT SUBSTANTIALLY INTERFERE WITH OR ININJURY THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF OTHERS. OTHER PROPERTIES ARE NOT AFFECTED AS THE VARIANCE AS THE FRONT PORCH DOES NOT INFRINGE ON NEIGHBORS’ PROPERTIES. THERE IS STILL CONSIDERABLE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE PORCH WITH NEW ADDITIONAL STEPS REQUIRED TO ELEVATE THE HOUSE AND PUBLIC SIDEWALK. NUMBER FOUR, THE VARIANCE IS IN HARMONY WITH THE ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE VARIANCE WILL PRESERVE THE HISTORIC DESIGN INTEGERATEY OF THE HOME, THEREFORE IT’S IN HARMONY OF THE GENERAL PLAN AND TAMPA COMP REHNSIVE PLAN. ALLOWING THE VARIANCE WILL RESULT IN SUBSTANTIAL JUSTICE BEING DONE. OUR ANSWER IS ALLOWING THE VARIANCE DELIVERS JUSTICE AND THE CURRENT OWNERS, MY WIFE AND I TO KEEP THE ORIGINAL HISTORIC DESIGN OF THE HOME AND NEIGHBORS TO CONTINUE TO BENEFIT FROM THE ORIGINAL AESTHETICS CONSISTENT WITH OTHER HYDE PARK HOMES WHILE AVOIDING FLOOD DAMAGE. NEN SIX, THE VARIANCE IF GRANTED WILL ALLOW DEVELOPMENT CONSISTENT WITH DESIGN STANDARDS. OUR ANSWER IS THE VARIANCE IS SPECIFIC TO A PART OF THE STRUCTURE AND DESIGN BUILT OVER 100 YEARS AGO CONSISTENT WITH OTHER HOMES OF THIS DESIGN IN THE HYDE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD. THE PROPOSED DESIGN ALLOWS THE SAME APPROACH FROM THE SIDEWALK. >> THIS CONCLUDES OUR VARIANCE REQUEST. >>TED KEMPTON: THANK YOU. >>RON VILA: GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONERS. RON VILA, STAFF WITH HISTORIC PRESERVATION. BOTH VARIANCE ITEMS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. AT THIS POINT IT’S A FINDING OF FACT. THEY’VE READ INTO THE RECORD. YOU HAVE THE PAPER COPY IN FRONT OF YOU. YOU OPEN UP FOR DISCUSSION. THIS IS HARDSHIP DRIVEN SO THE QUESTIONS SHOULD BE HELD TO THE VARIANCE AT THIS POINT. IF THE VARIANCE PROCEEDS OR APPROVED, WE CAN GO TO THE CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS. >>TED KEMPTON: GREAT, THANK YOU. ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC HERE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS? NOT SEEING ANY. WE’LL MOVE ON TO MY RIGHT. QUESTIONS. >>TIM JONES: IS IT POSSIBLE TO GRANT A VARIANCE TO ONLY INCLUDE THE STAIRS AND ONLY INCLUDE THE ADDITION AND NOT JUST DO A GENERIC FRONT YARD SETBACK? >>TED KEMPTON: SAY THAT AGAIN? >>TIM JONES: IS IT POSSIBLE TO ONLY DO THE VARIANCE JUST FOR THE STAIRS AND JUST FOR THE — >>TED KEMPTON: YES, WE’VE DONE THAT BEFORE. TID OKAY. — >>TIM JONES: OKAY. >>BRIAN — >> NO QUESTIONS. >>TED KEMPTON: CAN YOU COME UP TO THE FRONT ELEVATION AND THE EXHIBIT, YOU SHOWED THE WELCOME. THE CROSS SECTION THAT SHOWED THE — >> THIS ONE? >>TED KEMPTON: NO, THE CROSS SECTION. RIGHT THERE. SO ZOOM INTO THERE IF YOU CAN. AND MY QUESTION IS, YOU’VE GOT THE BLACK, THE STAIRS OUTLINED IN BLACK WHICH IS NICE. THANK YOU. WHATEVER THAT DIMENSION IS IS FROM THE BOTTOM STAIR TO THE SETBACK LINE. IS THAT THE EXACT DIMENSION THAT’S THERE NOW ON THE WELCOME WALL AND STAIRS? >> ACTUALLY NO. SO THE WELCOME WALL IS AT — I DON’T KNOW HOW TO ZOOM IN TO SHOW YOU ANY — WE’LL PUT IT OVER ON THE — IT’S ACTUALLY THE WELCOME WALL. BECAUSE THE WELCOME WALL IS AT FOUR FOOT WHICH IS ABOVE THE THREE-FOOT LINE. >>TED KEMPTON: NO, I UNDERSTAND THAT THE SETBACK IS THE WELCOME WALL. I’M ASKING THAT INTERNAL DIMENSION FROM THE WESTERN MOST FACE OF THE WELCOME WALL TO THE RISER OF YOUR STAIR. WHAT YOU’RE SHOWING ON THE DRAWING — WHAT I WANT TO MAKE SURE IS WE’RE NOT PUTTING MORE SPACE THERE THAN WHAT’S THERE NOW. >> IS IT SHOWING UP THERE? >>TED KEMPTON: YEAH, WE CAN SEE IT. >> SO THE SETBACK HERE — >>TED KEMPTON: SO GO TO THE WESTERN LINE. THE VERTICAL LINE. SO YOUR PEN IS KIND OF RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE. THE RED LINE FROM THERE TO THE FACE OF YOUR LOWEST TREAD, THE RISER, IS THAT — WHATEVER THAT DIMENSION IS, IS THAT EXACTLY WHAT IT IS TODAY ON THE STAIRS? >> IS THAT EXACTLY WHAT IT IS TODAY? NO. >>TED KEMPTON: SO WHY IS IT BIGGER? I DON’T WANT TO GIVE — MY THOUGHT IS WHY AM I GIVING YOU MORE ROOM UNLESS YOU HAVE TO HAVE IT. THAT’S WHAT I’M ASKING. >> SO OUR SETBACK AT THIS POINT IS, ON THE EXISTING, IS APPROXIMATELY HERE. ABOUT 18 FOOT. SO WE’RE ADDING FIVE STEPS BRINGING IT OUT. >>TED KEMPTON: I UNDERSTAND THAT. IT’S ALL ABOUT THAT ONE RATIO FROM YOUR BOTTOM RISER TO THE FACE OF THE WELCOME WALL. >> HERE. >>TED KEMPTON: YEAH, JUST THAT DIMENSION. SO TODAY ON YOUR WELCOME WALL AND YOUR BOTTOM RISER, HAVE YOU ENLARGED THAT SPACE RIGHT THERE? IF IT’S EXACTLY THE SAME, THAT’S FINE. >> I — YES. THAT IS EXACTLY THE SAME. I MEAN, I’LL HAVE TO SEE A PICTURE OF IT ACTUALLY. DO YOU HAVE A PICTURE OF IT, RON? HERE’S THE PICTURE. AND WE ARE TRYING TO HIDE THAT HANDRAIL THAT WE HAVE TO ADD IN NOW, WHICH NECESSITATES SOME OF THE HEIGHT THERE. >>TED KEMPTON: ALL RIGHT. FUNCTIONAL REASON. GOT IT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? OKAY. >>JOHN PROKOP: NO. I WAS GOING TO HAVE — (INDISCERNIBLE) SAME THING. >>TED KEMPTON: SEEING NO OTHER QUESTIONS, YOU HAVE UP TO FIVE MINUTES IF YOU SO CHOOSE. >> I THINK WE’LL YIELD IT BACK TO YOU GUYS. >>TED KEMPTON: PERFECT, THANK YOU. I’M GOING TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS PORTION. DISCUSSION? >>JOHN PROKOP: IT’S KIND OF — NO. THE HONEST — THE DISCUSSION IS IS THAT BY CREATING THE RISE AND EXTENDING THE STAIRS, IT CREATES THE WELCOME WALLS HAVING TO BECOME SO MUCH BIGGER AND SO MUCH MORE PROMINENT TO HIDE THAT RAILING. WHICH IS UNFORTUNATE BECAUSE I THINK THEY’RE A LITTLE OUT OF SCALE ON PROPORTION BUT IT’S KIND OF WHAT HAS TO HAPPEN. THAT’S MY ONLY COMMENT. >>TED KEMPTON: WE CAN DISCUSS THAT IN THE NEXT ONE. DOES SOMEBODY — >>TIM JONES: THE ONLY CONDITION I WANT TO HAVE IS WE’RE ONLY APPROVING THE STAIRS AND ONLY APPROVING — >>JOHN PROKOP: YES. >>DAN MYERS: I BELIEVE THAT DOESN’T EVEN NEED TO BE MENTIONED IN THE APPROVAL OF THE VARIANCE BECAUSE IT GOES WITHOUT SAYING THAT WE ARE ONLY APPROVING THAT. IS THAT CORRECT? STAFF? >>DANA CROSBY COLLIER: DO STATE THAT WITH REGARD TO THE VARIANCE IT’S LIMITED TO THE SECTION ON THE DRAWINGS. THANK YOU. >>TIM JONES: I’LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE — MOVE THAT THE VARIANCE REQUEST FOR CASE ARC-25-0000318 LOCATED AT 820 SOUTH BOULEVARD AS DEPICTED ON THE SITE PLAN PRESENTED IN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR A FRONT SIDE BACK — FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM 25 FEET TO 12 FEET WITH 2.66 FOOT FOR EAVES AND GUTTERS AND A SOUTH SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 7 FOOT TO 6 FOOT WITH A 2.66 FOOT FOR EAVES AND GUTTERS — WELL, SORRY. BE GRANTED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. THAT THEY ONLY — THE SETBACK VARIANCE IS ONLY PERTAINED TO THE FRONT STEPS AND THE SIDE EXISTING ADDITION. BASED UPON THE PETITIONER’S MEETING THE BURDEN OF PROOF WITH REGARD TO THE SIX HARDSHIP CRITERIA SET FORTH IN SECTION 27-114D OF THE CITY OF TAMPA CODE OF ORDINANCES FOR GRANTING VARIANCES AS STATED AND THE EVIDENCE PROVIDED IN THE PUBLIC HEARING, SPECIFICALLY — IS THERE MORE TO THAT? SPECIFICALLY THAT — >>DANA CROSBY COLLIER: THAT THE APPLICANT MET THE HARDSHIP CRITERIA. >>TIM JONES: THAT THE APPLICANT MET ALL THE HARDSHIP CRITERIA. >>JOHN PROKOP: I’LL SECOND. >>TED KEMPTON: WE HAVE A SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION? SEEING NO DISCUSSION, ALL IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE. MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. >> WE NEED TO SEE OUR SLIDES ON THE PROJECTOR AGAIN. OKAY. AS I SAID BEFORE, I’M TED SLACK, I’M ONE OF THE OWNERS OF THE HOUSE. THIS IS MY WIFE TERRY YOUNG. I WANT TO GO THROUGH JUST A QUICK OVERVIEW OF WHY WE’RE HERE. AND THEN MATT IS GOING TO TAKE OVER AND GO THROUGH SOME OF THE TECHNICAL DETAILS THAT I KNOW YOU ALL WANT TO HEAR. SO WE THE OWNERS HERE OBVIOUSLY LIVE ON BAYSHORE — I MEAN SOUTH BOULEVARD AND OUR HOME IS AT VERY HIGH RISK OF FUTURE FLOODING. WE ARE LOCATED ACCORDING TO DAVE JENNINGS IN A FLOOD ZONE AE-11 AND OUR HOUSE IS CURRENTLY IN AN ELEVATION OF 8.6 FEET. WE NEED TO LIFT OUR HOUSE FROM 8.62 TO 12 FEET TO BE FEMA COMPLIANT. WE WOULD HAVE LIKED TO HAVE NOT LIFTED IT AS HIGH BUT WE UNDERSTAND WE HAVE TO LIFT IT TO THE FEMA MINIMUM REQUIREMENT. WE’RE GOING JUST TO THAT MINIMUM OF 12. WE EXPERIENCED SIGNIFICANT FLOODING DURING HELENE LAST YEAR. I’LL SHOW YOU A COUPLE PICTURES OF THE FLOOD WATER AROUND THE HOUSE AND BOULEVARD. AND I HAVE — RON AND STAFF SUGGESTED I CRAWL UNDER THE HOUSE AFTER EVERYTHING DRIED OUT AND TAKE PICTURES OF THE FLOOR JOISTS TO SHOW HOW CLOSE THE WATER GOT TO ENTERING OUR HOME. ON OUR STREET THE 800 BLOCK OF SOUTH BOULEVARD, APPROXIMATELY TEN NEIGHBORS HAD FLOOD WATER THAT CAME INTO THE FIRST FLOOR OF THE HOME INCLUDING THE NEXT DOOR NEIGHBOR RIGHT NEXT DOOR ON THE SOUTH SIDE. FLOOD WATER GOT WITHIN SIX INCHES OF ENTERING OUR FIRST FLOOR. DID OTHER DAMAGE BUT IT DIDN’T COME INTO THE HOUSE. SO TO MITIGATE THE RISK OF THIS HAPPENING AGAIN WE’RE SEEKING TO REQUEST A MODEST ELEVATION OF THE HOME TO THE MINIMUM FEMA REQUIREMENTS FOR DESIGN FLOOD ELEVATION OF 12 FEET TO PROTECT FROM FUTURE STORM SURGE. WE ORIGINALLY DID NOT WANT TO DO THIS. WE WERE VERY CONCERNED ABOUT THE BEAUTY OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. OUR HOME. WE THINK OUR HOME IS NOT THE NICEST HOUSE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. WE THINK IT’S A VERY NICE HOME AND WE DIDN’T WANT TO IMPACT NEGATIVELY THE LOOK OF THE HOUSE. IT’S VERY COOL LOOKING AND GOT A LOT OF HISTORIC CHARM AND WE’VE BEEN ON THE BEACH WITH HOUSES ON STILLS AND THINK THEY LOOK HORRIBLE. WE UNDERSTAND WHY THEY’RE BUILT THAT WAY BUT WE’RE VERY CONCERNED ABOUT DOING THIS. FORTUNATELY MATT WHO IS OUR GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS A VERY GOOD ARTISAN AT WORKING ON HISTORIC HOMES AND RESTORING AND REPAIRING AND REFURBISHING HISTORIC HOMES TO THEIR ORIGINAL CHARM. HE ALSO DOES ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. HE USED AUTO CAD AND SAID BEFORE YOU SAY NO, LET ME DRAW A COUPLE ELEVATIONS WITH THE WAY TO ELEVATE THE HOME. BUT TO BLEND IT SO THAT IT’S NOT QUITE SO VISIBLE. HE SAID I CAN’T HIDE THE STAIRWAY BUT I THINK I CAN MAKE THE REST OF THE HOUSE HAVE A BLENDED LOOK SO YOU WON’T NOTICE IT’S LIFTED AS MUCH IF YOU LIFT THE FOUNDATION OF THE HOME. AND WE’LL SHOW YOU THE CHANGES IN A MOMENT. WE WANT TO MAINTAIN THE CURRENT TWO-STORY STRUCTURE, MAINTAIN THE HISTORIC CHARACTER OF THE HOME AND NEIGHBORHOOD AND AGAIN, A MINIMUM DFE OF 12 FEET. WHILE CREATING AN ILLUSION OF A SHORTER FOUNDATION BY LOWERING THE CURRENT SIDING DOWN. WE HAVE EXAMPLES OF OTHER HOMES IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND HYDE PARK WHERE SIDING OFTEN COMES DOWN ALL THE WAY TO GRADE OR CLOSE TO GRADE WHERE OURS DOES NOT NOW AND WOULDN’T WITH WHAT WE’RE PROPOSING. WE’RE TRYING TO DO THIS TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT OF THE LOOK AND FEEL OF THE HOME. ENHANCE THE HYDE PARK COMMUNITY BY PRESERVING ONE OF MANY BEAUTIFUL HOMES THERE. WE DON’T WANT TO COMPLETELY CHANGE AND WE’RE NOT TRYING TO ADD GARAGES OR ADDITIONS OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. WE’RE LITERALLY — OUR APPROACH TO THIS IS TO FIX AND REPAIR WHAT COULD NOT BE DONE IN 1915 BECAUSE THE ORIGINAL BUILDER DIDN’T HAVE NERVEIMATION THAT WE HAVE NOW. BEFORE OUR HOME WAS BUILT, THE GREAT GALE OF 1948 I THINK HAD A FLOOD SURGE, A STORM SURGE OF 15 FEET. THAT HAPPENED BEFORE OUR HOME WAS BUILT. SIX YEARS AFTER, THE TARPON SPRINGS HURRICANE HAD WE UNDERSTAND 11 TO 12 FOOT SURGE IN TAMPA BAY. PROBABLY IMPACTED THIS HOUSE. WE DON’T HAVE ANY PICTURES TO PROVE IT BUT PROBABLY DID. THEN OF COURSE WITH HELENE BASED ON THE PICTURES WE TOOK AND TAPE MEASURE PICTURES, WE THINK AN 8 TO 8.5 FOOT SURGE FROM THAT STORM AND WE ALMOST FLOODED. HASN’T HAPPENED YET WHILE WE’RE HERE BUT WE’RE AFRAID IT WILL. WE DON’T WANT TO COME WITH A DAMAGED HOME AND DEAL WITH THE RULE. OBVIOUSLY THIS INCLUDES A NEED FOR TWO VARIANCES TO ACHIEVE THIS. SO THESE WERE PICTURES FROM THE NIGHT OF HELENE. THAT DAY MANY OF YOU REMEMBER THERE WAS HARDLY ANY RAIN OR WIND. WE HAD A LITTLE WATER COMING UP BAYSHORE AND UP BOULEVARD AND BY 5:00 OR 6:00 IT LOOKED LIKE WE WERE IN THE CLEAR. WE THOUGHT THE HURRICANE HAD GONE NORTH AND ABOUT 6:00 OR 7:00, ALL OF A SUDDEN THE WATER STARTED COMING UP BOULEVARD VERY QUICKLY AND THESE PICK CAMERAS WERE TAKEN ABOUT 10:00 AT NIGHT AND YOU CAN SEE IN OUR BACKYARD, THAT’S ACTUALLY A POOL THERE. THERE IS A POOL UNDER THIS COMPLETELY COVERED. THIS IS AN AUXILIARY BUILDING WE BUILT IN 1921 WITH RON AND STAFF AND ARC’S FLOOD. WE HAD 18 INCHES OF WATER FLOOD THAT. THE LAWN CHAIRS ARE UNDERWATER HERE. THIS IS THE FRONT PORCH BY HIGH TIDE AT 1:30 IN THE MORNING, WATER CAME WITHIN ONE INCH OF GETTING ON OUR FRONT PORCH. IT WAS SO CLOSE. AFTER I CALLED — I CALLED RON AND SAID I THINK WE’LL HAVE TO DO SOMETHING TO AVOID THE FUTURE. THIS SAPICTURE OF ME UNDER THE HOUSE. THIS IS A FLOOR JOIST IN OUR KITCHEN. IT’S THE BACK OF THE HOUSE. YOU CAN SEE THE WATER LINE HERE WAS SIX INCHES AWAY FROM THE SUBFLOOR AND THEN IN THE FRONT OF THE HOUSE, THIS IS THE ORIGINAL HOME AND THIS IS AN ORIGINAL FLOOR JOIST AND THE FLOOD WATER GOT WITHIN EIGHT AND A HALF INCHS OF THE FRONT HOUSE. VERY CLOSE. TOO CLOSE FOR OUR SAKE. WE CONTACTED DAVE JENNINGS, MATT SUGGESTED, AND WE’VE SEEN HIM PRESENT WITH OTHER HOMEOWNERS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD AT THIS FORUM. HE CONFIRMED OUR PROPERTY IS AN AE11 SO THE FLOOR WOULD BE REQUIRED TO BE AT ELEVATION 12.0NAVD TO BE COMPLIANT. WE HAVE A CRAWLSPACE OF TWO FEET. WE DON’T REQUIRE A BREAK AWAY WALL BUT WE NEED FLOOR VENTS. THERE ARE 42 PIERS NOW SUPPORTING THE HOUSE WITH BRICK VENTS BETWEEN THEM ALL. THOSE WOULD PROVIDE THE SAME STRUCTURAL BENEFIT AS THE FLOOD VENTS SO WE DON’T NEED TO ADD THEM, WE DON’T BELIEVE, BUT WE’RE CERTAINLY OPEN TO FEEDBACK IF THE CITY OF TAMPA REQUIRES IT. THIS IS MATT’S ORIGINAL DRAWING THAT GOT US TO CONSIDER EVEN COMING BEFORE YOU TO CONSIDER THIS, SO THIS IS ACTUALLY A PICTURE OF THE PROPOSED HOME. WE BROUGHT THE ORIGINAL OR CURRENT SIDING GOES TO THE FINISHED FIRST FLOOR WHICH IS THIS LEVEL. SO WE’RE ACTUALLY BRINGING THE SIDING DOWN TO THIS LEVEL AND CURRENTLY THE BOTTOM OF THE HOUSE IS A DRIP CAP MOULDING AND THERE IS A WEATHER BOARD HERE AT THE BOTTOM, SO OUR PROPOSAL WAS TO BRING THE WEATHER BOARD AND DRIP MOULD TO THE BOTTOM AS IT IS NOW SO IT BLENDS A LITTLE BIT, YOU KNOW, THE FOUNDATION WHICH IS GOING TO BE RAISED A LITTLE OVER THREE FEET. STAFF — ARC STAFF CAME BACK AND RECOMMENDED WE TAKE THIS APPROACH TO LEAVE THE DRIP CAP MOULDING AND THE WEATHER BOARD WHERE IT IS. WE ACTUALLY ADDED A SILHOUETTE IN EACH OF THESE OF A SIX-FOOT PERSON IN TERMS OF THEM WALKING BY THE HOUSE AND WHAT THEY’D SEE AND A SIX-FOOT PERSON WAS LOOKING RIGHT AT THE WEATHER BOARD WHICH WOULD REMAIN WHERE IT IS NOW. WITH SIDING BENEATH IT, WE DON’T FEEL LIKE THAT MAINTAINS THE HISTORIC CHARACTER OF THE HOME AS MUCH AS OUR ORIGINAL PROPOSAL. RON AND STAFF RECOMMENDED WE DRAW THIS WITH RAISING THE FOUNDATION. AND LEAVING THE ORIGINAL HOUSE EXACTLY AS IT IS. THIS TO US FEELS LIKE A HOUSE, A HISTORIC HOME THAT’S MOVED TO ST. PETE BEACH ON STILTS. SO THIS IS A SIX-FOOT PERSON WALKING IN FRONT OF THAT. THEY’D SEE THE WEATHER BOARD AGAIN JUST LIKE IN THIS PARTICULAR RENDERING AND ALSO A VERY HIGH BRICK FOUNDATION WHICH IS NOT WHAT WE WERE HOPING TO DO. SO WE HAVE COME BACK WITH A COMPROMISE. THIS IS OUR FINAL PROPOSAL THAT WE’RE BRINGING TODAY WHICH IS TO LEAVE THE CURRENT EXISTING DRIP CAP MOLDING AND THIS IS WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE HERE. YOU’RE WELCOME TO TAKE A LOOK AT IT. CAN I PASS IT TO YOU? THIS IS THE DRIP CAP MOLDING THERE WITH THE WEATHER BOARD BENEATH IT. WE ARE PROPOSING TO LEAVE IT THERE NOW. IT’S PAINTED WHITE AND BRING SIDING DOWN BELOW IT WHICH WOULD BLENDS THE HOME WITH THE FOUNDATION THROUGH — A LITTLE OVER THREE FEET HIGHER THAN IT IS NOW. WE CAN’T DO ANYTHING WITH THE FRONT STAIRS. WE HAVE TO ADD FIVE STEPS TO BE WITH CODE AND WELCOME WALLS HAVE TO GO UP WITH IT UNFORTUNATELY. THAT’S THE ONLY THING WE CANNOT BLEND WITH THIS PRESENTATION. AND THIS IS THE SIDING. SO WHAT RON WILL GIVE YOU — WE HAVE TO USE FEMA GRADE FORTIFIED MATERIALS FOR ANYTHING BELOW DFE. SO THAT’S WOOD SIDING THAT WE HAVE ON THE HOUSE NOW AND THEN THAT’S BEEN — THE SECOND IS PVC SIDING THAT’S BEEN BUILT BY NORTH RUM LUMBER THAT WE ACTUALLY USED ON THE AUXILIARY BUILDING IN THE BACK. IT LOOKS THE SAME BUT IT’S FEMA COMPLIANT. WE’D USE THAT EVERYTHING BELOW THE DESIGN FLOOD ELEVATION TO HELP BLEND THE LITHING OF THE HOME. THIS IS A NEIGHBOR NEXT DOOR TO US ON THE SOUTH SIDE. WE MENTIONED THIS HOUSE DID FLOOD ON THE FIRST FLOOR. THEY HAVE THE SAME DRIP CAP MOLDING ON THEIR HOME AT THE FINISHED FIRST FLOOR LEVEL. THAT’S WHAT INSPIREDTUSE COME BACK WITH THE RECOMMENDATION. THEY’VE GOT IT. WE’VE GOT IT. IT DOES PROVIDE A SEPARATION BETWEEN THE EXISTING HISTORIC HOME AND THE NEW BUT IT’S — AND THEN ONE OF OUR CHALLENGES WITH JUST RAISING THE HOME AND RAISING THE FOUNDATION, WE CANNOT DO ANYTHING TO HIDE THE BRICK. WE CANNOT HIDE WITH LANDSCAPING. YOU’LL SEE A FIVE-FOOT FOUNDATION WHEN YOU WALK TO THE HOUSE AND A LOT OF FRIENDS AND NEIGHBORS PARK IN THE DRIVEWAY AND HAVE TO WALK IN THIS SIDE DOOR OR THE FRONT DOOR AND THEY’LL BE LOOKING AT A LARGE FOUNDATION. SO OUR PROPOSAL IS TO USE THE SIDING TO BLEND IT. KEEP THE DIFFERENTIATION THERE. THE MATERIALS ARE DIFFERENT. IF YOU DO FORENSIC EXAMINATION OF THE HOME YOU’D SEE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WOOD AND PVC. IF YOU TOOK THE CORN BOARDS OFF, YOU’D — CORNER BOARDS OFF, YOU’D SEE THE DIFFERENCE BUT TO PROVIDE AN ADDITIONAL MORE DISTINCTIVE DELINEATION, WE’RE HAPPY TO LEAVE THE DRIP CAP MOLDING THAT YOU HAVE THERE IN FRONT OF YOU AS A DIFFERENTIATION AS WELL BETWEEN THE TWO. AND AGAIN, AS WE MENTIONED BEFORE, MANY OF THE HOMES IN HYDE PARK — WE HAVE PICTURES IN OUR APPENDIX. THE SIDING IN MANY HOMES IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD GO DOWN TO THE GRADE OR JUST ABOVE GRADE. SO WE THINK IT WOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. SO OUR GOALS ARE ALIGNED WE BELIEVE WITH THE SECRETARY OF INTERIOR GUIDELINES. THIS COMES FROM THEIR DOCUMENTATION ON HOW TO DO THIS. WE’RE TRYING TO OBVIOUSLY REDUCE FLOOD RISK. WE ALMOST HAD OUR HOME FLOOD. WE GOT LUCKY. WE’RE TRYING TO MAINTAIN THE HISTORIC CHARACTER AND NOT ADD A BUNCH OF PORCHES AND DIFFERENT DRIVEWAYS AND ADDITIONAL LIVING SPACE. WE’RE NOT TRYING TO ADD ADDITIONS. WE’RE JUST TRYING TO FIX AND REPAIR THE HEIGHT OF THIS HOME WHICH COULD NOT BE DONE IN 1915 BECAUSE THEY DON’T HAVE THE INFORMATION WE HAVE NOW. WE’RE TRYING TO BLEND THE ELEVATION CHANGE WITH THE EXISTING STRUCTURE TO PRESERVE THE HISTORIC LOOK AND FEEL OF THE HOME AND NOT SAY, HEY, WE TEARED DOWN ANOTHER HOUSE. WE WANT TO AVOID THIS. THIS NEEDS TO BE FEASIBLE AND AFFORDABLE. ALL THESE LIFTS COST AT LEAST A HALF MILLION DOLLARS AND WE THINK IT’S WORTH IT BECAUSE THE HOME IS A BEAUTIFUL HOME. THAT’S THE INTRODUCTION TO THIS. I WANT TO TURN IT OVER TO MATT TO GO OVER SOME OF THE DETAILS OF THE LIFT THAT WE’RE PROPOSING. >> MATTHEW VARN, AUTHORIZED AGENT AND GENERAL CONTRACTOR FOR TED AND THERESA YOUNG. — TED SLACK AND THERESA YOUNG. SO THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. SO WE ARE JUST LIFTING. SO ANY IMPACT TO THE SITE WE’RE GOING STRAIGHT UP. WE’RE NOT ADDING ANY PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS SO WE’RE JUST LIFTING. I DON’T KNOW IF I CAN ZOOM IN ON THIS VERY — SO WE DID DO NEED FIVE ADDITIONAL STEPS. THE APPROXIMATE LIFT IS 3.38 FEET TO GET IT TO THE CURRENT DFE. ARE YOU SEEING ANY OF THESE NUMBERS OR NO? WE CAN FLIP OVER TO THIS. SO THIS IS OUR CURRENT STRUCTURE BASICALLY. IT’S SHOWING OUR FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION RIGHT HERE AT 8.62. AND THEN THIS WOULD BE — SO THAT’S THE FRONT ELEVATION AS IT SITS. AND THEN THIS IS OUR CURRENT — THIS WILL BE OUR PROPOSED. APPROXIMATE RAISE IS 3.38 RO ROUGHLY. IT KEEPS OUR PEAK HEIGHT AT 31 FEET. WHICH IS MEASURED OFF THE DFE. AND AS TED MENTIONED, KEEPING THE DRIP CAP, WE HAVE THE ABILITY TO MASK SOME OF THIS HEIGHT WITH THE PVC SIDING WHICH LIKE TED ALSO MENTIONED, WE CAN AT A LATER DATE IF WE — IF FOR SOME REASON IT NEEDED TO BE REDUCED, WE WOULD KNOW EXACTLY WHERE IT IS BECAUSE OF THE DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN THE MATERIALS. SO THAT’S OUR FRONT ELEVATION WHICH DEFINITELY KEEPS US WITHIN THE 35-FOOT MAXIMUM. THIS IS SHOWING OUR WELCOME WALL. AGAIN, TO HIDE THE STAIR HANDRAIL, WE DID NEED TO ADD A LITTLE BIT OF MASS TO THE WELCOME WALL. THIS IS OUR ORIGINAL. AND THIS IS OUR PROPOSED. BASICALLY THIS IS THE COVER SHEET. IT’S SHOWING WHAT OUR PURPOSE IS. ALL OF OUR LOT COVERAGE IS STAYING THE SAME. WE’LL JUMP TO THE SITE PLAN NEXT SHOWING ALL THE HARDSCAPES AND LANDSCAPES AND STUFF LIKE THAT. AGAIN, WE’RE JUST, YOU KNOW, KEEPING ALL GREEN SPACES. WE’RE KEEPING ALL LOT COVERAGES. WE’RE NOT CHANGING ANY OF THAT. WE’VE GOT OUR TREES. ANY OF THE TREES THAT WOULD NEED TO BE REMOVED, WE WOULD REMOVE THOSE AND TRY TO SAVE THEM. IF WE COULDN’T, WE WOULD DEFINITELY REPLACE THEM WITH LIKE FOR LIKE. WE’RE PROTECTING OUR OAK TREES IN THE BACK. ANOTHER GOOD POINT ON THIS ONE IS OUR ORIGINAL HVAC UNITS ARE HERE. AND LIFTING THE HOUSE AND GETTING THOSE UP — OUR ME MECHANICALS UP TO THE DFE, THEY’D BE EXPOSED ABOVE OUR CROSS FENCE HERE. WE THREW AROUND A COUPLE OPTIONS FOR A SCREEN OFF THAT FENCE WHICH WOULD PROBABLY NEED A VARIANCE AS WELL BUT IT WAS, YOU KNOW — WE WEREN’T SOLD ON IT. SO AS ANOTHER OPTION, WE THOUGHT TO MOVE THE HVAC BEHIND THE — THE TWO CONDENSERS BEHIND THE STRUCTURE HERE WHICH IS A PORCH WE HAD FOR THE VARIANCE WHICH WOULD MASK IT FROM THE STREET. I THINK WE ALREADY DID THIS ELEVATION. SO THIS IS SHOWING THE PROPOSED OR THE EXISTING OF OUR EAST ELEVATION, WHICH IS THE BACKYARD. WE HAVE THREE ACCESS POINTS. WE HAVE TWO ACCESS POINTS IN THE BACK. AND THIS IS SHOWING OUR PROPOSED WHICH WE’D HAVE TO ADD STAIRS. THIS IS ALL WOOD. ALL WOOD. SHOWING OUR DIFFERENTIATION LINE HERE WHICH CONTINUES AR AROUND — ADDITIONALLY WE’D BRING THE PVC SIDING UP. THIS IS SHOWING OUR EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION. AND THIS IS OUR SOUTHERN ELEVATION. WE’D KEEP ALL THE SAME MASSING ON THE BRICK PIERS. THE BRUCK VENTS. — BRICK VENTS TO KEEP THE ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL GOING. WE’D HAVE TO INCREASE THE STAIRS. THESE WOULD ALL BE WOOD. ASK THIS IS THE VARIANCE THAT WE HAVE BEEN APPROVED FOR. AND THIS IS THE SOUTH ELEVATION. SHOWING OUR EXISTING WHICH WE HAVE STAIRS HERE WHICH WHICHCHISE FROM HARD SCAPE. STAIRS GOING TO THE POOL. WE’D HAVE TO CHANGE STAIRS AROUND. ALL WOOD. ALL WOOD. DELINEATION LINE. PVC. OUR BRICK WORK WOULD BE MATCHED THE SAME. SO THIS IS ROUGHLY OUR WALL SECTION. BASICALLY EVERYTHING ABOVE THIS WE’RE POINTING OUT AND WE ALSO DO HAVE A MATERIAL PALETTE THAT WE’LL SHOW NEXT. EVERYTHING ABOVE THIS LINE WOULD REMAIN THE SAME ALONG WITH THIS MOULDING. EVERYTHING BELOW WOULD BE THE PVC. OUR BRICK, WE WOULD MOST LIKELY HAVE TO REBUILD THE BRICK BUT WE WOULD BUILD IT IN THE SAME MANNER AS WHAT WE HAVE. SAME MASSING. SO EVERYTHING BELOW THISLINE WE DID — THIS LINE WE DO NEED TO USE THE CLASS FOUR AND FIVE MATERIALS. WE’D BRICK VENEER OUR COLUMNS. THIS HERE ACTUALLY IS — I BELIEVE THIS IS AN ADDITION BUILT IN THE ’80s SO THESE ARE, I BELIEVE, OUR CONCRETE CINDER BLOCK UNDERNEATH WITH BRICK VENEER ON THEM. ALL OUR WINDOWS ARE REMAINING. SHINGLE ROOF UNCHANGED. SO BASICALLY THIS IS DEPICTING THE SIDING. SIDING, WE PASSED AROUND. EVERYTHING BELOW THIS LINE WE’D USE SIDING TO DIFFERENTIATE. MOULD WOULD REMAIN THE SAME AS IT IS, WOOD. AND THEN ALL OUR SIDING WOULD REMAIN THE SAME. BRICK VENEERS, SOLID BRICK FOR OUR VENTS AND — AND THEN BASICALLY ALL OUR WINDOWS ARE STAYING THE SAME UNCHANGED. ALL THE TRIM IS STAYING UNCHANGED. ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF UNCHANGED. EXPOSED RAFTER TAILS, BEAUTIFUL RAFTER TAILS AND SOFFIT WORK ALL REMAINING UNCHANGED. THE PORCH MATERIALS, AS WE’RE RAISING THE PORCH, AND MAINLY THE FRONT PORCH, THERE MAY BE SOME STUFF THAT NEEDS TO BE REPAIRED. WE INTENDS TO REPAIR THAT WITH IDENTICAL TERMS TO WHAT’S THERE, WHETHER IT’S THE WOOD. EVERYTHING — KEEP THE ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS UNCHANGED. AGAIN, THE — AS FAR AS THE DESIGN FLOW. WE WANT TO KEEP THE FOUNDATION ENCLOSURE IDENTICAL TO THE MASSING THAT’S THERE. THIS RIGHT HERE IS OUR — THIS IS THE PROJECT SITE. AND BASICALLY WHAT I DID WAS WE WENT DOWN AND WE DREW LITTLE LINE SKETCHES OF THE HOUSES. WE GOT THE ELEVATIONS SO WE CAN SEE THERE IS NOT A REAL — AS THEY WERE BUILT WITH DIFFERENT TIMES, YOU KNOW, DIFFERENT STYLES, WE GOT A STORY AND A HALF NEXT DOOR AND A NONCONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE TO THE NORTH AND AN ANOTHER STORY AND A HALF. A LOT OF THE HEIGHTS ARE NEVER GOING TO BE EQUAL OR THE SAME, SO WE JUST WANTED TO DEPICT THAT AND WHAT WE’RE — AND THE ELEVATIONS OF THE PEAKS. THIS RIGHT HERE IS A NONCONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE THAT IS BUILT TO CURRENT CODES. THIS WAS — I’M NOT SURE THE EXACT TIME THIS WAS BUILT. I THINK IT WAS PROBABLY 2010 , ROUGHLY. BUT IT DOES HAVE — IT DOES HAVE A CURRENT ELEVATION. LET ME ZOOM IN ON THIS. SO THIS IS THE CURRENT ELEVATION ABOVE SEA LEVEL. 47 FOOT TO THE PEAK. AND THEN OUR PEAK HEIGHT OFF FINISHED — OFF THE DESIGN FLOOD ELEVATION IS THE 35-FOOT. SO AS RAISING HOMES IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD GOES, THIS WOULD BE LIKE THE MAX HEIGHT AND WE’RE ACTUALLY FOUR FEET BELOW THAT. COOL. AND THEN I THINK THE — YIELD THE TIME BACK TO YOU GUYS. >>RON VILA: GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONERS. RON VILA, STAFF WITH HISTORIC PRESERVATION. JUST TO REITERATE WE HAVE THE LETTERS OF SUPPORT IN YOUR PACKET. AND WORKING WITH THE OWNER AND AGENT, STAFF FINDS THIS APPLICATION IS CONSISTENT WITH THE HYDE PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES AND SECRETARY OF INTERIOR STANDARDS WITH THE PLANS WE LOOKED AT AUGUST 19. IN THE FLOOD MITIGATION OF THE SECRETARY OF INTERIOR STANDARDS, ON PAGE 76, AND I THINK IT’S VERY IMPORTANT, WE SAW THREE RAISING OF THE HOUSES FROM GRADE, FROM FLOODPLAIN TO BE CONSISTENT WITH FEMA’S REQUIREMENTS. AND IN BOLD ON PAGE 76 IT DISCUSSES ESTABLISHING A UNIVERSAL STANDARD OR MEASUREMENT ON HOW HIGH ANY GI GIVEN BUILDING SHOULD BE IS IMPOSSIBLE TO COME UP WITH THAT FORMULA. SO AS WE LOOK AT THESE, I THINK THEY’RE ON A CASE BY CASE SITUATION MOVING FORWARD. HAVING PUTTING THAT INTO THE RECORD, I HAD SOME CONDITIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS REQUEST THROUGH THE PRESENTATION, HE HIT ON MOST OF THESE. THE SUMMARY THAT I FEEL IS COMFORTABLE HERE IS THAT HE IS RAISING IT LESS THAN FOUR FEET TO THE MINIMUM DFE AT 12 FEET. HE’S BEEN IN CONSULTATION WITH THE FLOODPLAIN MANGER, DAVE JENNINGS. THE FRONT STEPS, IF THEY NEED TO BE BREAK AWAY OR NOT. HE HAS AN E-MAIL SAYING WHAT IS PRESENTED IN ALL ASPECTS OF THE REVIEW IS ACCEPTABLE TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. MOVING FORWARD, THERE IS PROBABLY GOING TO BE TWEAKING AS THE PLANS ARE LOOKED AT BUT THE OVERALL CONCEPT OF WHAT IS PRESENTED TODAY MEETS THE PRELIMINARY REVIEW. WE ALSO IN REVIEWING IT AND STAYING CONSISTENT WITH THE SECRETARY OF INTERIOR STANDARDS, WE LOOK AT THAT DATUM LINE THAT HAS TO BE INCORPORATED INTO THE PROJECT. THEY HAVE THAT DRIP CAP THAT THEY PUT THERE. HE WENT THROUGH DIFFERENT ITERATIONS. THIS IS WHAT THEY LANDED ON. THERE IS THIS ADDITION — THIS ADDITION IS SPEAKING OUT THAT THERE IS DIFFERENT MATERIAL BELOW THAT DATUM LINE THAN WHAT’S ABOVE THAT. IN ALL PROJECTS THAT COME FORWARD WE HAVE OUR STANDARD TEMPLATE AT THE BOTTOM OF PAGE THREE WITH A WALL SECTION WITH THE MATERIAL PALETTE FOR THE ROOF, OVERHANGS, EXTERIOR WALL MATERIALS, THE DOORS AND WINDOWS, THE TRIM, THE PORCHES AND LIGHTING AND HARDWARE. THAT — NONE OF THAT IS CHANGING THROUGH THIS REQUEST THIS EVENING. SO JUST FOCUS ON THE PORTION HERE. WE SPOKE ABOUT THE VARIANCE ALREADY. WE PASSED THE VARIANCES ALREADY AND FOCUS ON THE MITIGATION THAT HE IS SHOWING YOU THIS EVENING. I’LL BE HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. >>TED KEMPTON: GREAT. THANK YOU, RON. ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC HERE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS PROJECT? NOT SEEING ANY, WE’LL MOVE ON WITH QUESTIONS. STARTING ON MY RIGHT. >>TIM JONES: ON YOUR SITE PLAN, CAN YOU TELL ME HOW LONG THE DRIVEWAY IS FROM THE SIDEWALK? >> IS THERE A MEASUREMENT ON TH THERE? >> I DO NOT HAVE A MEASUREMENT ON THERE, BUT THIS IS THE 25-FOOT SETBACK. THE HOUSE IS APPROXIMATELY, YOU KNOW, THREE FOOT OFF OF THAT. >>TIM JONES: SO IT APPEARS YOU DON’T HAVE THE ABILITY TO PARK TWO CARS IN THE DRIVEWAY INSIDE THE SIDEWALK, IS THAT CORRECT? >> YEAH. OH, YEAH. WE DO ALL THE TIME. CAN’T BE A SUPER LONG — I HAVE AN SUV AND WE PARK TWO SUVs IN THERE ALL THE TIME. >>TIM JONES: OKAY. >> AND WE DON’T BLOCK THE SIDEWALK WHEN WE DO THAT. WE ALSO HAVE A BACK PARKING AREA TOO. RIGHT HERE. SO THIS IS AN AUXILIARY BUILDING WE BUILT IN 2021 AND THAT’S A PARKING AREA. BRICK PAVERS. >>TIM JONES: PREVIOUSLY YOU MADE MENTION ON THE FRONT DRIVEWAY THAT YOU COULDN’T PUT ANY TYPE OF FOLIAGE THERE TO — THE MASSING BECAUSE OF THE DRIVEWAY. >> YEAH. WE DO HAVE THE BRICK — THE CONCRETE RIBBONS AND BRICK WORK. >> WE CAN’T PLANT ANYTHING. ANY SHRUBBERY. >>TIM JONES: OKAY. YOUR MECHANICALS. IF YOU MOVE THEM TO THE NEW LOCATION YOU’RE PROPOSING, IS THERE A WAY TO SCREEN THOSE SO YOUR NEIGHBORS CAN’T SEE THOSE? YEAH? >> I THINK WE CAN WORK OUT SOMETHING ON THE PLATFORM. >>TIM JONES: ON YOUR BRICK DETAIL, ON YOUR ELEVATIONS, EXISTING DOESN’T SHOW — IT JUST SHOWS — IT LOOKS LIKE YOU HAVE A BRICK LATTICE WORK OF SORTS. AND YOUR NEW LOOKS LIKE YOU HAVE SOLID BRICK AT THE BOTTOM WITH THE LATTICE WORK ABOVE IT. >> IT’S PROBABLY A DRAWING ERROR. BASICALLY WE WOULD CONTINUE WHAT IS THERE NOW. SO AS WE CAN RETAIN THE FLOOD — FLOOD FOR THE WATER TO PUSH THROUGH AS NECESSARY. >> WE HAD FOUNDATION WORK DONE IN 2019. WE HAD SOME DAMAGE FROM PREVIOUS RAIN WATER. AND WHEN THE FOUNDATION COMPANY REBUILT THE FOUNDATION, THEY WERE ORIGINAL BRICK PIERS. THEY REMOVED THOSE. THEY PUT A WATER SEAL ON THE BOTTOM. CINDER BLOCK, POURED CONCRETE BETWEEN THEM. TERMITE SHIELD ON THE TOP AND THEY PUT BRICK VENEER AND THE VENTS BETWEEN THE PIERS, THEY JUST POT FOOTER AND THEN — PUT A FOOTER AND THEN BRICK ON TOP. >>TIM JONES: YOUR PROPOSED LOOKS LIKE YOU HAVE A SOLID BRICK WALL BELOW YOUR VENTING. IS THAT INCORRECT? >> THIS IS INCORRECT, YES. IT’S JUST A DRAWING ERROR. WE WOULD BRING THIS VENT DOWN. WE COULD POTENTIALLY MAKE A PORTION OF THIS UP HERE SOLID. THERE WOULD DEFINITELY BE FLOW THROUGH — AT GRADE, YES. >>TIM JONES: THAT’S ALL MY QUESTIONS. >>DAN MYERS: SO IS THAT BRICK — THE BRICK SCREENING AT THE FOUNDATION, IS THAT PAINTED AT THIS TIME? >> YES. IT IS PAINTED. >>DAN MYERS: YOU GUYS ARE LUCKY. >> IT WAS PAINTED WHEN WE BOUGHT IT. >>DAN MYERS: AND THE PORCH — >> THE PORCH IS NOT. >>DAN MYERS: BUT I WANT TO KNOW ABOUT THE FRONT PORCH. >> IT’S JUST RED BRICK. >>DAN MYERS: BUT THE FLOOR. IT’S SOME NICE — YOU’VE DONE SOMETHING TO IT. >> OH, IT’S A BRAZILIAN CHERRY PORCH FLOOR THAT WE HAD INSTALLED IN 2019. IT’S VERY NICE. WE GET A LOT OF COMPLIMENTS ON THAT. >>DAN MYERS: SO THAT GETS LIFTED UP. >> ABSOLUTELY. >>DAN MYERS: IT SEEMS VERY SENSITIVE. THANK YOU. THAT’S ALL MY QUESTIONS. >>JOHN PROKOP: A COUPLE QUESTIONS. ONE FOR STAFF, IS THE PVC MATERIAL ACCEPTABLE IN LIEU OF HARDIE BOARD OR IS THAT A MORE ACCEPTABLE MATERIAL? >>RON VILA: I THINK THEY’RE COMPATIBLE MATERIALS. IN REVIEWING THIS WITH THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT, IT DOES MEET FEMA’S REQUIREMENTS FOR THE MITIGATION BELOW THAT DATUM LINE. >>JOHN PROKOP: I HATE THE WORD PVC. >> WE DO TOO. >> WE AGREE. >>RON VILA: I THOUGHT THE SAME THING. WHEN HE BROUGHT ME IN THE SAMPLE AND HOW THEY CAN WORK WITH IT, IT WORKS LIKE WOOD. >>JOHN PROKOP: IT LOOKED GREAT. THE SAMPLE. THE TECHNICAL THING ABOUT THE — I KNOW THE WORD PVC DOES NOT GO WITH HISTORIC PRESERVATION VERY WELL. >>RON VILA:. >>RON VILA: UNDERSTOOD. >>JOHN PROKOP: CAN YOU PUT THAT ELEVATION BACK UP THAT SHOWS THAT THE FRONT ELEVATION — I GOT A VERY SPECIFIC QUESTION FOR YOU. THE WHITE WEATHER BOARD STRIPE ACROSS ON THE EXISTING CON CONDITION. WHEN YOU RAISE THE HOUSE AND YOU LEAVE THE DRIP CAP, WHICH IS THE RIGHT THING TO DO TO INDICATE HERE WAS THE ORIGINAL HOUSE, HERE IS THE STUFF THAT WE ADDED LATER, COULDN’T YOU PUT THE WEATHER BOARD BACK AT THE BOTTOM SO THE BRICK EXPOSE SNIDE. >> THAT WAS OUR PROPOSAL. THAT’S OUR ORIGINAL PROPOSAL. >>JOHN PROKOP: THAT THE EXPOSED — NO, BACK AT THE BOTTOM. SO THAT THE EXPOSED BRICK MATCHES THE HEIGHT OF THE ORIGINAL EXPOSED BRICK. THAT WAS NOT ONE OF THE OTHER ALTERNATIVES THAT WAS SHOWN EARLIER. >> SO WHAT YOU’RE SAYING IS COULD WE LEAVE THE DRIP CAP IN THE MIDDLE AND DROP THE — >>JOHN PROKOP: THE WEATHER BOARD TO THE BOTTOM SO THE WHITE STRIPE IS IN THE EXACT SAME PLACE –. >> SO NOT BRINGING THE BRICK UP AT ALL. >>JOHN PROKOP: CORRECT. DON’T BRING THE BRICK UP. BRING THE SIDING DOWN. AND LEAVE THAT WEATHER BOARD AT THE BOTTOM. >> WE DID THINK ABOUT IT. WE DIDN’T HAVE ANYTHING DRAWN UP. >> CAN YOU STAND UP HERE? >>JOHN PROKOP: SINCE YOU SPOKE UP — >> TERRY YOUNG. >>JOHN PROKOP: TELL US WHO YOU ARE AND EVERYTHING. >> WE DID TALK ABOUT IT. AND THE REASON WHY IS WE WERE REALLY SEEKING TO BLEND AND HONESTLY MASK THAT WE HAD EVER DONE ANYTHING TO THIS HOUSE. SO WE THOUGHT THAT BRINGING THE BRICK UP A LITTLE BIT AND BRINGING THE SIDING DOWN A LITTLE BIT REALLY — MET THAT CONCEPTUALLY. >>JOHN PROKOP: IT DOES. >> WE THOUGHT BRINGING THE SIDING ALL THE WAY DOWN, IT JUST MAKES IT — IT MAKES THE FIRST STORY LOOK DISPROPORTIONATE TO THE SECOND ONE. IT JUST — >>JOHN PROKOP: THAT’S WHAT I’M SAYING. IN THIS PARTICULAR DRAWING HERE, YOU SHOW THE WEATHER BOARD DOWN LOW. >> BUT WE ALSO BROUGHT THE BRICK UP. >>JOHN PROKOP: NO. ON THE UPPER LEFT. >> YES, THAT’S RIGHT. >>JOHN PROKOP: YOU BROUGHT THE WEATHER BOARD DOWN AND KEPT THE BRICK ABOUT THE SAME HEIGHT. >> NO. THE BRICK CAME UP — ABOUT A FOOT AND A HALF? TWO FEET? >>JOHN PROKOP: SO IT CAME UP A LITTLE BIT. >> IT’S CURRENTLY TWO FEET NOW. >>JOHN PROKOP: GO BACK TO WHAT YOU’RE PROPOSING TO DO, WHICH IS THAT, BUT WITHOUT THE WHITE STRIPE AT THE BOTTOM. WITHOUT THE WEATHER BOARD AT THE BOTTOM WHICH IS WHAT THE CURRENT HOUSE LOOKS LIKE. IS THERE — I’M JUST TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHY YOU WOULDN’T DO THAT. KEEP THE DRIP CAP UP HIGH. >> ESSENTIALLY YOU’RE SAYING DO THE UPPER LEFT AND KEEP THE DRIP CAP — >>JOHN PROKOP: WHERE IT IS. WHERE IT IS. AND THAT MAKES THE HOUSE LOOK — I DON’T — >> WE DID NOT TALK ABOUT THAT. >>JOHN PROKOP: IT SEEMS TO MAKE MORE SENSE. >> IT’S ALWAYS AT THE BOTTOM OF THE SIDING. IT’S NEVER IN THE MIDDLE. >>JOHN PROKOP: EXACTLY. SO IT MAKES SENSE TO DO THAT. EVEN IF YOU WANT TO COMPROMISE AND IT’S NOT IN THE EXACT SAME HEIGHT BUT PUT THE WEATHER BOARD BACK SO YOU’RE NOT — THERE IS NOT AS MUCH BLANK NEW PVC SIDING AND THERE IS NOT AS MUCH BRICK. THAT’S MY SUGGESTION. >> WE’RE FINE WITH THAT. >>JOHN PROKOP: ALSO, WHEN WE GO TO THE WELCOME WALL IN SECTION, I HAVE — THERE IS A WELCOME WALL. IT JUST SEEMS LIKE IT’S GOTTEN REALLY MASSIVE. AND IF YOU CAN ZOOM IN ON THAT. KIND OF THE IDEA OF THE WELCOME WALL WAS TO COVER THE SIZE OF THE STAIRS. AND NOW YOU’RE BUILDING THESE MASSIVE BRICK WALLS. >> WE HAVE TO PUT A HANDRAIL IN WHICH WE DON’T HAVE NOW. >>JOHN PROKOP: IT’S BECAUSE YOU’RE OVER THE 36 INCHES WHICH MEANS YOU HAVE TO — YOU HAVE TO HAVE SOME KIND OF PROTECTION AT THE EDGE THERE. >> AND OVER THREE STEPS I THINK. >>JOHN PROKOP: YEAH. BUT THE IDEA OF A WELCOME WALL, THIS IS NOT A WELCOME WALL ANYMORE. IT’S KIND OF BASTARDEREDIZING FOR LACK OF A BETTER PHRASE WHAT A WELCOME WALL IS. WOULD YOU ENTERTAIN HAVING A NICE SINGLE BRASS RAIL BUT LOWER THE WELCOME WALLS AND REDUCE THE MASS QUITE A BIT. >> SO THE WELCOME WALL CURRENTLY NOW, THE TOP HERE IS IN LINE WITH THE FLOOR — THE PORCH FLOOR AND THE ONLY REASON WE RAISE IT UP IS BECAUSE WE HAVE TO PUT A HANDRAIL IN AND WE’RE TRYING TO ATTACH IT TO SOMETHING. >>JOHN PROKOP: I’D MUCH RATHER THE WELCOME WALLS BE MUCH LOWER AND LESS MASSIVE AND SEE A NICE LITTLE DELICATE RAIL OF SOME KIND ACROSS THE TOP OF IT OR INSIDE OF IT OR SOMETHING AND I THINK THAT IT WOULD BE SO MUCH MORE ELEGANT TO THE FRONT OF YOUR HOUSE. >> THE NEED FOR THE HANDRAIL IS THE ONLY REASON WE RAISED IT. >>JOHN PROKOP: I WOULDN’T DO THAT. LET’S PUT IT THAT WAY. I’D LOWER THE BRICK AND EXPOSE THE RAIL. >> SO THIS IS THE — WE DID NOT HIT THIS ONE FOR SOME REASON. BUT THIS IS WHAT WE’RE PROPOSING INSIDE THE WALL. >>JOHN PROKOP: I SEE EXACTLY WHAT YOU’D DO. I’D RATHER SEE THE RAIL ON TOP EXPOSED AND HAVE SO MUCH LESS OF THE BRICK. THE IDEA OF THE WELCOME WALL IS YOU CAN SIT ON THAT. NOW YOU CAN’T SIT ON THAT, RIGHT? YOU CAN’T PUT A POT. >> THE BRICK IS PART OF THE ORIGINAL — THE BRASS RAIL IS NOT. BY CODE WE HAVE TO. >>JOHN PROKOP: IT WOULD DE COULD BE BRONZE OR A NICE PIECE OF WOOD OR SOMETHING ELSE. I’D INVESTIGATE THAT. AND THEN WHEN YOU REBUILD THE BRICK VENTS, BECAUSE THEY’LL ALL FALL APART AND WHATNOT. YOU’LL HAVE TO BUY MORE BRICK. HOW ARE YOU PLANNING ON MAKING SURE THE STUFF MATCHED WHAT YOU HAVE. OH, IT’S PAINTED. WE ALREADY FIGURED THAT OUT. NEVER MIND. I WAS GOING TO RECOMMEND YOU DO THE WHOLE FRONT WITH THE ORIGINAL BRICK AND BACK OF THE HOUSE WITH NEW BRICK. BUT NOW THAT IT’S ALL PAINTED, THAT’S A TOTALLY MOOT COMMENT. THAT’S ALL I HAVE. >>ELENA PARAS KETCHUM: NO QUESTIONS. >>TED KEMPTON: OKAY. WILL YOU LEAVE THAT UP? REAL QUICK, I THINK COMMISSIONER PROKOP HIT EVERYTHING THAT I HAD. WHY BRONZE OR BRASS? >> TRYING TO KEEP WITH SOMETHING THAT WOULD BE IN THAT PERIOD. >>TED KEMPTON: THE ONLY THING I’D HAVE IS — NO, NO. BUT YOU WANT IT TO DISAPPEAR. >> WE DO. >>TED KEMPTON: BUT THAT’S NOT THE MATERIAL TO MAKE IT DISAPPEAR. >>JOHN PROKOP: PLUS YOU GOT TO POLISH IT. >>TED KEMPTON: SO GO SIMPLE WITH IT. IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU’RE OPEN TO REDOING THE WELCOME WALL AND ALL THAT. >> WE HAVE TO PUT A RAIL IN. WE’D LIKE TO HIDE IT AS BEST WE COULD AND MAKE IT BLEND AS BEST WE COULD. >>TED KEMPTON: OKAY. YOU TALKED ABOUT EVERYTHING. I DON’T HAVE ANY MORE QUESTIONS. OKAY. SO NO QUESTIONS FROM US. YOU HAVE FIVE MINUTES FOR REBUTTAL IF YOU SO CHOOSE. >> WE’RE GOOD. THANK YOU. >>TED KEMPTON: GREAT. THANK YOU. AT THIS POINT WE’LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC PORTION OF THE HEARING AND MOVE ON TO DISCUSSION. SO YOU HIT EVERYTHING FOR ME. AS LONG AS WE PUT THE CONDITIONS IN AND WORK WITH STAFF ON THAT. >>JOHN PROKOP: EVEN A PIECE OF WROUGHT IRON OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. LIKE WOOD. OR SOMETHING. (INAUDIBLE) >>TED KEMPTON: THE DETAIL — IT DOESN’T ATTACH TO THE EXISTING HOUSE. THE ORIGINAL EXISTING HOUSE. >>JOHN PROKOP: TO THE NEW WELCOME WALL. >>TED KEMPTON: I THINK THEY’RE DOWN LOW. SO IT ATTACHES TO THE STAIR ON THE INSIDE OF THE WELCOME WALL AND DOESN’T ATTACH — SO IT’S THE UPPER — YEAH. SO. >>JOHN PROKOP: AND IT CAN BE A SINGLE RAIL. >>TED KEMPTON: ABSOLUTELY. AND IT DISAPPEARS. >> I MOVE TO GRANT A — I MOVE TO GRANT A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR THE DRAWINGS AND DOCUMENTS PRESENTED AT THIS PUBLIC HEARING IN ARC-25-0000318 AT 820 SOUTH BOULEVARD WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. THAT THE APPLICANT CONSIDER LEAVING THE DRIP CAP IN PLACE BUT PLACING THE WEATHER BOARD LOWER BENEATH THE NEW SIDING. THAT THE APPLICANT CONSIDER REDUCING THE HEIGHT AND MASS OF THE WELCOME WALL AND EXPOSING THE GUARDRAIL AND WORKING WITH STAFF AS TO WHAT EXACTLY THAT HANDRAIL OR GUARDRAIL MIGHT BE. I THINK THOSE ARE THE ONLY TWO CONDITIONS. BECAUSE BASED UPON THE FINDING OF FACT THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE HYDE PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES AND THE CITY OF TAMPA IN MATERIALITY, SCALE, AND MASSING, AND CHAPTER 27 OF THE TAMPA ORDINANCES. >>TED KEMPTON: OKAY. SECOND? >>TIM JONES: SECOND. >>TED KEMPTON: WE HAVE A SECOND. WITH CONDITIONS. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? DOES THE APPLICANT UNDERSTAND THE TWO CONDITIONS? AND YOU AGREE TO THE CONDITIONS? >> WE BRING THE DRIP CAP DOWN WITH THE — ONE MORE TRY. >>JOHN PROKOP: THE ANSWER IS A HARD NO. >> JUST THOUGHT I’D ASK. MY WIFE WANTED ME TO ASK. JUST KIDDING. SORRY. [LAUGHS] >>ELENA PARAS KETCHUM: DON’T THROW HER UNDER THE BUS. >>JOHN PROKOP: YOU JUST BLAMED HER FOR THAT. OKAY. >>TED KEMPTON: ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? OKAY. SO WE HAVE A MOTION ON THE FLOOR WITH CONDITIONS. ALL IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE. MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. CONGRATULATIONS. GOOD LUCK WITH THE PROJECT. AND I’M LOOKING FOR A MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE SUBMITTED DOCUMENTS AND EXHIBITS. >>DAN MYERS: MOVE TO RECEIVE AND FILE DOCUMENTS AND EXHIBITS AS PRESENTED AT THIS HEARING. >>ELENA PARAS KETCHUM: SECOND. >>TED KEMPTON: ALL RIGHT. NO DISCUSSION. ALL IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE. MOTION PASSES. THIS HEARING IS ADJOURNED. (SOUNDING GAVEL) AYES HAVE IT. >>MARTIN SHELBY: WILL YOU ANNOUNCE WHEN THE NEXT ONE IS OR WHERE. OR WILL IS NOTICED SUFFICIENTLY — >> THESE HAVE BEEN PROPERLY NOTICED.THANK YOU FOR ASKING. THE NEXT MEETING — THE NEXT PUBLIC HEARING IS SCHEDULED FOR AS I STATED PREVIOUSLY NOVEMBER 6 AT 150 D 30 APPLICANT O
Comments are closed.