I run a real-life landscape design company, and noticed over the past 3 years that most consumers could no longer afford our services. Between material and insurance inflation, most homeowners were being priced out of professional landscape design.
As AI started improving I figured there would be a ton of AI landscape design tools that would fill this need. But most AI tools did not account for a users hardiness zone, sunlight conditions, or recommend local native plants.
About a year ago I began working on this app, and it is now finally ready to be shared with the world. As more users subscribe I aim to increase the number of generations in the free tier, but there is still lots a free user can do with the add plants and magic erase tools.
Would appreciate feedback, especially negative feedback, to keep improving this tool and make landscape design more accessible to everyone.
by GreenGardenGremlin
4 Comments
not everything needs to be automated
I’ve done this a bunch using Gemini and ChatGPT, and recently they’re very good. I can tell it where I am and what I want, and I can do it many times over for the monthly price.
Why would I pay you to wrap their APIs and do essentially the same thing? I’d much rather pay for the base services than a tool that only does one thing.
It would be more convincing if the “after” photo was of the garden actually built and planted, instead of an AI render. Like show a before, ai render, and then an actual “after” photo. I’m so tired of seeing renders as the end result.
They all look the same to me. Boring as it can be. Zero creativity, all repetition and predictable.