Not sure if these are labeled correctly at my local nursery and wanted more opinion.
-
Is labeled echinopsis terscheckii- the spines on this look longer, wanted some more opinions on what this might be
-
Is labeled cereus peruvianus m (assuming the m is cutoff montrose). Looked funky, again doesn't look like what i google that name as.
Any thoughts?
by Danneskjold_Repo
7 Comments
The 1st looks more bridgesii to me. The second night be labeled correctly
Got something very similar here in N. NV
So the first potential bridgesii might be worth snagging?
I’d definitely pay $40 for that bridge stand
1 -bridgesii / 2 – cereus peru monstrose
The infamous Armstrong’s Bridge! Definitely worth snagging!
I dont like the ones with the larger spines.. i prefer the short spine variety. Do you want this for its appearance or for other purposes cause if you are after san pedro or torch at least san pedro i have tons of it where i live. Torch not as common but still around. And if it is not just for looks im sure i can help some of you guys out with 1 to 2 foot cuttings