Pink Floyd guitarist David Gilmour has been ordered to tear down his garden shed after neighbours fell foul of the ‘obtrusive’ development.

The 79-year-old submitted a retrospective planning application to Camden Council following the start of work on the development in April this year.

He insisted the new building at his home in Hampstead, north London – which replaced a summerhouse and old shed – was of ‘modest size’ and ‘traditional construction’.

But locals claimed the shed was ‘significantly more visually and physically intrusive than what was originally approved or what stood there before’.

Mr Gilmour has now been told he must move the 2.5-metre-high, 1.9-metre-wide and 2.9-metre-deep development – by 2.5 metres.

It comes after the musician had been forced to amend his retrospective plans following a string of complaints.

He has been handed a one-month ultimatum to tear down the structure and rebuild it 2.5 metres from the garden’s rear boundary.

The Hampstead Hill Gardens Residents’ Association said the situation should never have come to this as the shed ought to have been built on previous structures agreed under planning permission granted in 2023.

Pink Floyd guitarist David Gilmour has been ordered to tear down his garden shed (pictured) after neighbours fell foul of the 'obtrusive' development

Pink Floyd guitarist David Gilmour has been ordered to tear down his garden shed (pictured) after neighbours fell foul of the ‘obtrusive’ development

Mr Gilmour had outlined the shed design in his plans saying it would be 'bespoke' and detailing the measurements

Mr Gilmour had outlined the shed design in his plans saying it would be ‘bespoke’ and detailing the measurements

Neighbours went so far as to accuse Mr Gilmour of being 'unneighbourly'

Neighbours went so far as to accuse Mr Gilmour of being ‘unneighbourly’

Chairman Audrey Mandela called for the shed to be removed entirely.

She said: ‘The application should be rejected as the structure now in place is obtrusive, overbearing, and significantly more visually and physically intrusive than what was originally approved or what stood there before.

‘The decision we hope the council will make is that it is removed as soon as possible to stop the continued harm to neighbourhood amenity.

‘We are concerned that this appears to be a deliberately misleading application. It would seem that this is not a minor or technical oversight but a deliberate repositioning of the structure that would not have received permission.’

Whiteacre Planning, Mr Gilmour’s planning agents, said in application documents it would be ‘important the new development ensures that there is no adverse impact on neighbouring amenity such as overlooking, loss of privacy or overshadowing’.

Despite this some locals have accused Mr Gilmour of being ‘unneighbourly’.

Following submission of the retrospective application, one neighbour complained the new shed was against the rear fence and therefore could not be obscured with vegetation, as was the case with the old structure.

Another added the building should be amended to allow a two-metre gap behind the shed – in order to ‘provide space for planting and wildlife’.

Mr Gilmour had insisted the new shed at his home in Hampstead, north London - which was replacing a summerhouse (pictured) - would be of 'modest size' and 'traditional construction'

Mr Gilmour had insisted the new shed at his home in Hampstead, north London – which was replacing a summerhouse (pictured) – would be of ‘modest size’ and ‘traditional construction’

The development was replacing a summerhouse and an old shed (pictured) - but neighbours insisted it was much larger

The development was replacing a summerhouse and an old shed (pictured) – but neighbours insisted it was much larger

And objector Alex Shinder said: ‘There was no consultation and the action is unneighbourly.’

Whitacre Planning rejected the notion the shed would cause any adverse impact on neighbouring amenity.

It stated: ‘Although the roof of the shed is above the height of the boundary fence, it will not lead to any overlooking, loss of privacy, or overshadowing.’

The letter concluded Mr Gilmour’s proposal should be ‘granted without delay’ – as it ‘complies with all relevant local and national planning policy’.

It is not the first time one of the guitarist’s sheds has caused controversy.

In 2011, Mr Gilmour was told he must pull down a beach hut at his listed £3million seafront mansion or face prosecution.

The local council told the rock musician the yellow hut he used to house his bicycles was an eyesore in the conservation area at Hove, East Sussex, and had to go.

David Gilmour receives the "O2 Silver Clef Award" onstage on July 2 2025

David Gilmour receives the “O2 Silver Clef Award” onstage on July 2 2025

Mr Gilmour famously sold his house in London's Maida Vale to Earl Spencer and donated the £3.6million proceeds to Crisis, a charity for the homeless

Mr Gilmour famously sold his house in London’s Maida Vale to Earl Spencer and donated the £3.6million proceeds to Crisis, a charity for the homeless

The singer and songwriter (second from right) joined Pink Floyd in 1967 before the band became one of the highest-selling and most acclaimed acts in music history in the early 1980s

The singer and songwriter (second from right) joined Pink Floyd in 1967 before the band became one of the highest-selling and most acclaimed acts in music history in the early 1980s

Mr Gilmour famously sold his house in London’s Maida Vale to Earl Spencer – and donated the £3.6 million proceeds to Crisis, a charity for the homeless.

The singer and songwriter joined Pink Floyd in 1967 before the band became one of the highest-selling and most acclaimed acts in music history in the early 1980s.

Mr Gilmour has also released five solo albums.

Comments are closed.

Pin